The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 January 2019, 08:56 AM   #1
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
126710BLRO Two Versions?

Just curious if anyone else has seen this? Has Rolex actually heard peoples complaints and refined the color of the ceramic bezel insert?

Eric Ku posted this on his Instagram captioned "Per the precious conversation here is an early Pepsi and a later one. (Early is on bottom). You can clearly see the color difference"



Can we get some owners to post up pictures and when they received there watch and see if we can tell any difference?
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:02 AM   #2
BigBoy17
"TRF" Member
 
BigBoy17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Nik
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,166
No... its the light angle
BigBoy17 is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:05 AM   #3
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
126710BLRO Two Versions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBoy17 View Post
No... its the light angle


That’s what I originally thought and am still not writing off, but I doubt someone like him would post that up without considering that first.

*Edit



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:11 AM   #4
Vaxe
"TRF" Member
 
Vaxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
Nice to see the rumor finally confirmed by a trustworthy source. Here’s mine - I actually prefer the pastel blue and red over the new MK2.

The new version has a true navy blue and garnet red, can’t go wrong with either.
Vaxe is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:24 AM   #5
Shamorai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
Bottom watch is reflecting a white object. You can see it in the reflection going from the 6 to 9 marker.
Shamorai is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:33 AM   #6
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamorai View Post
Bottom watch is reflecting a white object. You can see it in the reflection going from the 6 to 9 marker.
Yes, but you can still see the color in the parts that are not reflecting.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:33 AM   #7
doboy007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SD, CA
Watch: BLNR/LVc/SkyD/ND41
Posts: 2,519
I call BS. Just the lighting difference.
doboy007 is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:39 AM   #8
thedak
"TRF" Member
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,589
Fake News
thedak is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:39 AM   #9
jackcarls0n
"TRF" Member
 
jackcarls0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: FL350
Watch: D'tona,BLNR,Bronze
Posts: 644
I went to an AD in Belgium and they did mention the first few BLRO they got had different shade compared to the latter ones they got. Side by side comparison was drastic, didn't see it in person. But I believe them. The picture posted above wouldn't have that much of a lighting difference due to the angle. I think Rolex did fix it.
jackcarls0n is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:40 AM   #10
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by doboy007 View Post
I call BS. Just the lighting difference.


Could be, I’ve only handled one in person so I can’t comment.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 09:50 AM   #11
Shamorai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillo38 View Post
Yes, but you can still see the color in the parts that are not reflecting.
If you are wearing a white shirt and have a ceramic bezel, tilt the watch towards you and then tilt it away. Watch the bezel lighten and darken.
Shamorai is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:09 AM   #12
kauffee
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
This is the third or fourth thread on this topic. At this point, enough people have claimed to hold both versions simultaneously that it’s undoubtedly true. Someone like Eric Ku is not going to be fooled by lighting and angle.
kauffee is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:19 AM   #13
watchamatic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Asia
Posts: 306
So if this is true, which version would be more valuable, the first version since less have been made?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
watchamatic is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:23 AM   #14
kultschar
"TRF" Member
 
kultschar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
I just actually finished watching insta vids in anticipation of mine being delivered.

In one of the vids it shows the watch showing BOTH colours when he angles the watch into the sunlight.

I think there are two variations but both still display that pastel colour in the sunlight
kultschar is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:26 AM   #15
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,856
I’ll take Eric’s word for it. Mine looked like both depending on lighting.
__________________
GB-man is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:31 AM   #16
Shamorai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
Check the posts by LVC and BLNR owners saying how the bezel changes depending on the light. Same.
Shamorai is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:34 AM   #17
exador
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchamatic View Post
So if this is true, which version would be more valuable, the first version since less have been made?
The "MK1" was in production for less than a year so Greys will add another $5k to the asking price
exador is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:35 AM   #18
dardeca
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauffee View Post
This is the third or fourth thread on this topic. At this point, enough people have claimed to hold both versions simultaneously that it’s undoubtedly true. Someone like Eric Ku is not going to be fooled by lighting and angle.
My thoughts exactly.
dardeca is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:35 AM   #19
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,229
This is too funny, Rolex changing the bezel blue....
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 10:36 AM   #20
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shamorai View Post
Check the posts by LVC and BLNR owners saying how the bezel changes depending on the light. Same.

Have you handled an early and late production version in person and personally confirmed it’s just the light making them appear different ?
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:04 AM   #21
Shamorai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillo38 View Post
Have you handled an early and late production version in person and personally confirmed it’s just the light making them appear different ?
I have not. I too only have photos to go by, but I know how deceiving photos can be.
Shamorai is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:07 AM   #22
kultschar
"TRF" Member
 
kultschar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaxe View Post
Nice to see the rumor finally confirmed by a trustworthy source. Here’s mine - I actually prefer the pastel blue and red over the new MK2.

The new version has a true navy blue and garnet red, can’t go wrong with either.
I also prefer this look

48 hours to go for me :)
kultschar is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:16 AM   #23
TruthBalance
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,652
If it’s true, definitely like the newer darker richer colors.
TruthBalance is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:25 AM   #24
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,172
Fake news... I absolutely believe someone like him would post up a doubt just to get views and spark discussion, a discussion that's a non starter. I could do the same thing with two D-Blue dials with a 2° angle difference and claim "Rolex changed the blue dial? Looks like it"...
Social media is making us dumb. I have no doubt that someone could reenact a war of worlds alien invasion just using twitter and Instagram and people would go nuts for a fake alien invasion.

Probably another hidden justification to charge more on the secondary market. These guys are influencers and if they "pee" people wonder why and how.
Rashid.bk is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:35 AM   #25
BigBoy17
"TRF" Member
 
BigBoy17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Nik
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,166
Unless its stated by rolex directly... which will never happen, this is a crock of you know what. Its Lighting... lighting and.... lighting:)
BigBoy17 is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:37 AM   #26
justdate
"TRF" Member
 
justdate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: RJ
Location: UK Coast
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,328
Can’t he just take a photo of both the watches lying side by side, with a simple photo taken from above? I feel that would clear a lot of ambiguity. Would like to see this.
justdate is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:40 AM   #27
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,343
If an early so called “mk1” bezel owner wants to meet up with me here in NY I’ll take professionally lit, perfectly even studio photos of the two side by side! Just let me know. Or of course you could just give me your watch if you’d prefer Lol.
Chadridv is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:42 AM   #28
Spikedlee
"TRF" Member
 
Spikedlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Watch: Too many to narrow
Posts: 585
It’s the angle of the watch I can attest to it. I’ve tried to take photos of my BLRO so many times and the shots look purple but in person it’s dark blue. There is only one version period
Spikedlee is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:42 AM   #29
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by justdate View Post
Can’t he just take a photo of both the watches lying side by side, with a simple photo taken from above? I feel that would clear a lot of ambiguity. Would like to see this.
According to the caption it's not his pic. https://www.instagram.com/p/Bs35p6dlTkr/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spikedlee View Post
It’s the angle of the watch I can attest to it. I’ve tried to take photos of my BLRO so many times and the shots look purple but in person it’s dark blue. There is only one version period
I don't own either (if there is two versions) and have only seen one BLRO in person since it's release so I can't personally comment on this. Either way I think the BLRO is a beautiful watch no matter what lighting condition and would love to own one. However, unless you've seen both of the supposed versions in person and confirmed they're exactly the same I don't think you can say if there's one or two versions.

It could be completely bogus. It could be different batches have different colors. It could be Rolex has been trying to improve the color since its release and this is the next shade in the process.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline  
Old 21 January 2019, 11:50 AM   #30
Pauln
"TRF" Member
 
Pauln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
They look different to me—more than just the lighting.
Pauln is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.