ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 February 2019, 12:42 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 1,029
|
Milgauss
|
17 February 2019, 12:49 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Pelagos. Dont care that it is their sister brand.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
17 February 2019, 01:04 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: US East Coast
Posts: 118
|
I wear a Submariner Date commercial fishing.
|
17 February 2019, 01:10 AM | #64 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,507
|
I think either the Exp II or the SeaDweller. Both are beyond rugged. The tie breaker may be that the ExpII with a fixed bezel can go anywhere and won’t break and 2 time zones is a great complication. Military guys tend to favor Exp II’s, SD’s, and Subs. Must be a reason. When the British Special Air Service chose a Model to be made for them they chose the ExpII and the reserve regiment chose the ND sub while the SRR chose both the Exp II and the SubC Date.
|
17 February 2019, 02:09 AM | #65 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
|
17 February 2019, 03:45 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 271
|
So if I were in a “no shit there I was in a real world scenario!” I’d go with the explorer 2 42mm.
I think the SD would be a close second but I think the GMT/military time in low light complication gives it the edge. The depth rating on the SD is awesome but lets be honest how often if at all will you need that kind of rating? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 February 2019, 04:39 AM | #67 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
|
I choose this puppy. I'm sure it can handle all the islands you'll throw at it.
|
18 February 2019, 12:53 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Watch: 1680/8 & '88 16528
Posts: 721
|
Probably has to be the Milgauss or Submariner.
You could time an event accurately using a watch with a seconds hand, for example Milgauss, Submariner, Chronograph or GMT. You could work out a second time zone by adding or subtracting hours, for example a Milgauss, Submariner, Chronograph or GMT. You could be around magnetic fields using a watch with an iron core, for example Milgauss, forget Submariner, forget Chronograph & forget GMT. You could dive to 300 meters with a Submariner, forget Milgauss, forget Chronograph & forget GMT. So Milgauss or Submariner. |
18 February 2019, 01:32 AM | #69 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: UK
Watch: 114270, 16570
Posts: 349
|
|
18 February 2019, 02:00 AM | #70 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'd have to go with Explorer or Milgauss because when the OP brings up "actual hard use" and shock absorbers it speaks of reliability/to what degree it's bulletproof. When you do that one has to look at potential points of failure and wear. No extra complications or turnable bezel means fewer parts to break or be lost. Explorer II, Subs, GMTs, etc have those extra bits (date complications, turning bezels, 24 hour hands). The Explorer also has what Rolex claims is (if you believe them) an improved shock absorbing system, the only model with no complications that does. |
||
18 February 2019, 02:03 AM | #71 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,007
|
__________________
*Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN 274
|
18 February 2019, 02:19 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: "BG"
Location: PacNW
Watch: that I'm Jonesin 4
Posts: 626
|
IHMO, Sub or GMT ceramic. The ability to rotate the bezel and scratch resistance, just edges out the Expl II. There probably isn't a better looking dial than the Expl II, however.
It's pretty clear, we need all three.
__________________
116610LN, 326934BL, 116610LV, Tudor BB41, IWC tzc, Aerospace EVO, Tudor BB41, 116622, Fortis-705.21.11, Luminox original diver The watch you give up today for the next grail may one day become your grail: Rolex:116520, 16570, 216570, 116710LN, 16610LV, 16700, 116600 Panerai:PAM176, PAM1024, PAM88 Breitling:6.75, Aerospace x2, Chrono 44 GMT, Blackbird/utc, Bentley GT IWC:3717. |
18 February 2019, 02:24 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
|
Tudor Pelagos. If I was on a deserted island, that would be the one.
I could care less about a second time zone in that scenario. Lightweight, water resistant, timing bezel, and amazing lume...yep the Pelagos would be it. |
18 February 2019, 02:45 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: VA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 1,373
|
1016, 5517, or 1675.
|
18 February 2019, 04:09 AM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
|
I agree with OP. Explorer 2 all the way.
|
18 February 2019, 04:24 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: In your basement?
Watch: Oysterquartz
Posts: 88
|
IMO, the 116710 (GMT Master II) is a better tool watch (for all-round use) than the 216570 or 16570 (Explorer II). Here are the reasons why:
1. Unlike the 216570, the 116710 has a rotating bezel: this provides an additional timezone and it's easy to use. 2. Unlike the 16570, the 116710 has a Triplock crown to ensure a better (functional) seal. My friend managed to successfully pressure test a 116710 to the same depths of a 116610 (lol). |
19 February 2019, 04:53 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Watch: 1680/8 & '88 16528
Posts: 721
|
|
19 February 2019, 05:44 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Where needed
Posts: 69
|
And dont forget the Second time zone watches make it easier to use as a compass, which could be useful in theses scenarios. Therefore EXP II or GMT Master.
EXP II gets my vote. Here is how to do it: Step One Make sure your 24 hour hand is set to the current time zone. Step Two Check the weather, make sure it is sunny. Step Three Point the small hour hand in the direction of the sun whilst holding your watch flat. Step Four The 24 hour hand will be pointing North if in northern hemisphere. |
19 February 2019, 07:56 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tony
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT II & SUB
Posts: 278
|
+1 for the EPX II,
I love this watch and hopefully I'll have a polar to compliment my Sub and GMT at some point
__________________
♛ Rolex GMT II 116710LN ♛ Rolex SUB 116610LN ♛ Rolex DJ 178240 |
19 February 2019, 08:33 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: UE
Posts: 421
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.