Rolex GMT 16700 Chamfers vs. GMT II 16710 Chamfers

[ppgs]

For all GMT I 16700 and GMT II 16710 owners here that still have it unpolished, how do the chamfers compare in terms of the cut? It appears that the chamfers for the 16700 are less defined vs the 16710? Can anyone confirm this? Do post your photos! Thanks

[mtgjr]

It depends on the age of the piece. My D serial 16710 came with barely noticeable chamfers when new (2006), while I've seen examples from the early 90's with fairly pronounced chamfers.

[rolexjc]

I have those references same year both unpolished. I’ll post a picture soon

[ras47]

I can’t speak to other GMTs but here’s my 16710 BLRO.

[mtgjr]

Originally Posted by ras47

I can’t speak to other GMTs but here’s my 16710 BLRO.

I think he's looking for unpolished examples.

[05carbondrz]

Originally Posted by mtgjr

I think he's looking for unpolished examples.

There is no such thing according to some.....

[ppgs]

Originally Posted by mtgjr

It depends on the age of the piece. My D serial 16710 came with barely noticeable chamfers when new (2006), while I've seen examples from the early 90's with fairly pronounced chamfers.

Thanks mtgjr, if it isn't such a both would you mind posting the chamfers of your 16710? Thanks bud

[2th_doc]

I called LAWW the other day and asked them about case restoration. They were very helpful. Give them a call and ask them your question. I am very confident they can answer the differences as this is the specific type of work they do. 626-714-7288. Just ask to speak to someone about case restoration.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mtgjr]

Originally Posted by ppgs

Thanks mtgjr, if it isn't such a both would you mind posting the chamfers of your 16710? Thanks bud

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[hoppes-no9]

Originally Posted by mtgjr

I think he's looking for unpolished examples.

And maybe a photo that shows the chamfers, too.

[NA5AR]

Here’s my 2007 unpolished example if that helps?

Compared to some well used examples, this one has very defined and sharp chamfering

[mtgjr]

Originally Posted by mtgjr

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And a couple more pics, as it seems the second image isn't working. D serial, with very subtle chamfering. Almost undetectable with the naked eye.....





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mtgjr]

Originally Posted by NA5AR

Here’s my 2007 unpolished example if that helps?

Compared to some well used examples, this one has very defined and sharp chamfering

Did you purchase this one new from the AD?

[NA5AR]

Originally Posted by mtgjr

Did you purchase this one new from the AD?

No, I purchased from the original owner who purchased 2 from the same AD. One was still stickers up but no difference between the two so I went for this one as he offered it a lot cheaper

[Thuilln]

Originally Posted by hoppes-no9

And maybe a photo that shows the chamfers, too.

Mostly that, yeah!

[henrylee]

Originally Posted by NA5AR

Here’s my 2007 unpolished example if that helps?

Compared to some well used examples, this one has very defined and sharp chamfering

The chamfers on this one looks like it was re polished.

[mtgjr]

Originally Posted by henrylee

The chamfers on this one looks like it was re polished.

Agreed. As does the side of the case, with the "fun house mirror" reflection. I have never seen a no holes 16710 with such pronounced chamfering. Ever.