The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Rolex Explorer II or GMT Master II?
Explorer II (white dial) 139 37.37%
GMT Master II (day and night) 233 62.63%
Voters: 372. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 November 2014, 05:56 AM   #61
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by nameIess View Post
Hello everyone,

...and I must admit I'm starting to fancy this more than the GMT Master II.

The main turn off when it comes to GMT Master II to me is the shiny bracelet (I already have DJ II).

Thanks...
I prefer the GMT if for no other reason than it is the more powerful time zone tool. But because you're not buying the watch for me, after reading the above my vote went to the E2.

Sounds to me as though you prefer the Explorer II, so why even ask unless you're unsure? If you are undecided, don't buy anything until you've made up your mind.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 03:54 AM   #62
Theregulator
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 19
ExII for a more low key work presence.
Theregulator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 03:57 AM   #63
jack81
"TRF" Member
 
jack81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: planet rolex
Posts: 1,728
Blnr
jack81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 04:02 AM   #64
sickened1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 8,965
Explorer II.
sickened1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 04:24 AM   #65
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,215
Much like you I also don't really like the polished centre links on the GMT BLNR but I would definitely buy it over the Explorer II. But like everyone says it comes down to what really makes you happy.
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 06:01 AM   #66
captainnice
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Aliso Viejo, Ca
Watch: Timex
Posts: 668
GMT Master II
captainnice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 09:10 AM   #67
mattcantwin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 453
I voted EX II...


mattcantwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 11:15 PM   #68
regnant
"TRF" Member
 
regnant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Close to Rolex AD
Posts: 3,474
BLNR all the way
__________________
http://s30.postimg.org/eykg4i271/A_Lange_Sohne_Movement.jpg
regnant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 11:22 PM   #69
Jari from Finland
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 377
I myself would choose GMT II just for its shiny bracelet's sake.
Jari from Finland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 11:23 PM   #70
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Chaps

If I were only to have one watch, the choice would be the Explorer 2 simply because it is easier to live with.

I have a 39mm Explorer and I just plain forget that it is on my wrist. I also have a Sub which admittedly is a bit more showy but it is a total PITA when wearing it with a cuffed shirt.

I wore a double cuffed shirt with chain link cufflinks to provide as much free space as possible around my wrist but it kept catching on the cuffs all the time.

I actually took the sub off and put it in my pocket after a few hours. So if the OP is going to wear the watch with cuffs, then avoid a bezel type watch at all costs.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2014, 08:45 AM   #71
CrookedOak
"TRF" Member
 
CrookedOak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 81
It is such a tough decision. I go back and forth over which watch family I like better - the GMT or Explorer II. They are such great watches. I've been fortunate to nab a few along the way...

CrookedOak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2014, 08:50 AM   #72
Roller07
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
GMT Master II gets my vote.
__________________
Roller07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2014, 08:51 AM   #73
Planar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 74
Planar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2014, 08:53 AM   #74
ltmgeller
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
ltmgeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 21,447
Gmt for my vote. happy hunting.
ltmgeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2014, 09:05 AM   #75
domrusso10
"TRF" Member
 
domrusso10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: new york
Watch: 116334 & 116610
Posts: 1,310
Gmt
domrusso10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2014, 10:26 AM   #76
viper9669
"TRF" Member
 
viper9669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
Rolex Explorer II or GMT Master II?

I have been wearing the ExpII for the past 8 days straight, the tool-ish nature of the design and brushed bracelet makes it the perfect, imo, low-key watch for anywhere and everywhere.
And it is less pricier than the GMTc, which makes it very good value for money. Btw I love both my GMTc and ExpII.
viper9669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2014, 05:13 AM   #77
genta
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 474


Sold my 116710LN due to the PCLs.

Love my Polar!
genta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2014, 05:31 PM   #78
DocJekl
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Rocky Mountains
Watch: SS Pepsi GMT II
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by nameIess View Post
I entered this thread, I voted for batman... little did i notice is that I am the actual topic creator over a year go! LOL
That's pretty funny.

I have a 1983 Submariner, then got a 2000 GMT Master II Coke bezel last summer, and most recetly I picked up a 1993 Polar Explorer II. But I wanted a more recent Rolex and I had to part with an old one to do it, so it was between the GMT Master II, Submariner Ceramic, or Explorer II (the Datejust was stolen 3 yr ago).

My GMT Master II Coke was from the 1st year they had Superluminova and it's a classic, as well as my Sub which has the venerable 3035 movement and sapphire - both desirable years. So, it came down to the Exp II which looks smaller on my wrist because of the stainless bezel. A 42mm version was looking more attractive, and I didn't have to worry about polished center links.

I liked wear the Explorer II a lot and wanted working lume for nightime use - but it just wasn't cost effective to fix the issue without throwing a lot of money at it, or de-valuing the watch if it was done by a third party like with my Sub. Although the Sub has a great quality re-lume it still took a hit in value, which allowed me to buy it for less.

So, on Monday I upgraded to a new 216570 Polar Explorer II. Therefore, I voted Explorer II.

DocJekl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2014, 10:26 PM   #79
davvman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 47
Don't get this one!

davvman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2014, 10:37 PM   #80
JD521
"TRF" Member
 
JD521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: John
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,055
Another vote for a GMT II
Attached Images
File Type: jpg photo 2-4.jpg (109.5 KB, 109 views)
JD521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2014, 12:19 AM   #81
fizz54
"TRF" Member
 
fizz54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 41
I'd lean toward the GMT II but the explorer is slightly larger. Have you tried both of them on yet?
fizz54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2014, 02:11 AM   #82
davvman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 47
Why would anybody want that:

davvman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2014, 03:26 AM   #83
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,513
I would go Ex 2. If you see a Sub in your future, even more reason for one
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2014, 03:45 AM   #84
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
I like aesthetics if exp2. Love the orange hand and size of case. Also not as polished and shiny
Attached Images
File Type: jpg uploadfromtaptalk1417023890757.jpg (45.6 KB, 93 views)
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.