The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 December 2016, 04:39 AM   #61
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,690
This statement is technically 100% true in the sense that because of Rolexes market. If someone wants to get a high end watch. Especially if they don't know much about watches. I would say 9 out of 10 will get a rolex first and move on from there. The statement about subs in particular may be wrong but the brand is the worlds biggest introduction into high end watches.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 04:50 AM   #62
phillycheez
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakattack62 View Post
Patek's hold their value better than a Rolex.
Not as common and people who wear them fly under the radar and don't care what others think.
If I could afford a Patek I would be wearing a Patek. But I can't afford a Patek. So I wear a Rolex. Anything less than $10k.. Rolex is a great value actually.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
phillycheez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 04:56 AM   #63
Yamazaki
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 215
Probably. But that doesn't mean they are buying bad watches. They are still unknowingly buying great watches.
Yamazaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 05:07 AM   #64
insomniac2
"TRF" Member
 
insomniac2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Adam
Location: Chicago
Posts: 135
Sub is probably the most boring watch for a non watch enthusiast for that price range, i disagree that its the go to watch for everyone.
__________________
|Rolex 14060m|Superocean Héritage I Navitimer 43|
insomniac2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 05:08 AM   #65
Librarywilliam
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Bill Collins
Location: Sun valley,idaho
Watch: Audemars,IWC,Smurf
Posts: 233
Sometimes I .get angry at things I read here but I am here everyday. If I am going to say something unpleasant, I first look at the number of posts they have and usually refrain
Librarywilliam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 06:50 AM   #66
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakattack62 View Post
Patek's hold their value better than a Rolex.
Not as common and people who wear them fly under the radar and don't care what others think.
I don't know that I would agree with this generalization. Many people who wear Patek live in a world where it is very recognizable and as such wearing one identifies you as a member of the club.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 07:07 AM   #67
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Ferguson View Post
I don't know that I would agree with this generalization. Many people who wear Patek live in a world where it is very recognizable and as such wearing one identifies you as a member of the club.
And his statement is wrong as well. Many Rolex hold their value better than many Patek. Sure some Pateks do well but most drop substantially if bought at full retail like most other watches. Does a 5711 Blue 1A hold up well? Sure as does a 116500LN. If you bought a 5270 for retail you took a 35% plus beating like many other Pateks as well. So some hold up well and some not so much. Again just like someone buying a PM Rolex for full retail...Ouch. The same hold true for many if not most brands.
Patek and Rolex happen to be top 2 though overall for retention and marketability due to demand.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 07:14 AM   #68
speedmaster73
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by tifosi View Post
People who don't know watches by Rolex because people who don't know watches think it is the best brand there is. Plain and simple.
valid point.....

just as people who KNOW watches know that a Grand Seiko is as good as a Rolex
speedmaster73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2016, 07:16 AM   #69
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,347
The whole point of building a brand and a good reputation is so that the rank and file don't have to know everything there is to know in order to make a wise decision.

Rolex has spent a century in that pursuit.

Is it any wonder that the name Rolex says everything that anyone really needs to know?

Of course not and that's the way Rolex wants it.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 01:22 AM   #70
Orangejoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedmaster73 View Post
valid point.....

just as people who KNOW watches know that a Grand Seiko is as good as a Rolex
LOL

GS is haute horologie, I'm not sure you want to do a side by side with a mass produced Rolex.

Different leagues.

Edit: upon further reflection, I've concluded you must have been joking.
__________________
Truth be told today many don't wear a watch, they just wear the brand. -padi56
Orangejoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 01:26 AM   #71
Orangejoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
The whole point of building a brand and a good reputation is so that the rank and file don't have to know everything there is to know in order to make a wise decision.

Rolex has spent a century in that pursuit.

Is it any wonder that the name Rolex says everything that anyone really needs to know?

Of course not and that's the way Rolex wants it.
Yes, like BMW for cars or Brooks Brothers for suits, they are the brand name you can safely recommend knowing that most likely everything will turn out right.

There is always the danger they'll come back with a regatta timer, a CPO 1 series with high mileage or God forbid, black cordovan shell shoes with the suit, but all in all the "safer" choice for the man -or liberated lady- who does not want to examine his/her decisions closely.
__________________
Truth be told today many don't wear a watch, they just wear the brand. -padi56
Orangejoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 06:19 AM   #72
bio guyver
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 273
The answer is simple rolex is the most powerful watch brand and King in the watch game.
bio guyver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 06:43 AM   #73
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
You couldn't get a 16610 in the UK 20 years ago, it was almost the equivalent of the current Daytona. No ADs had them and there was a waiting list.

I semi-impulse bought mine in the USA in 2001. They had two in the window!
I remember seeing quite a few.. of course they could have been 16800s or 1680s for all I knew.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 07:24 AM   #74
rodneygt3
"TRF" Member
 
rodneygt3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Rodney
Location: CT
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 224
Rolex is no different than other respected luxury brands. People purchase the product for many reasons. There is not really a right or wrong reason, and up to the individuals to spend their money how they see fit.
rodneygt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 08:34 AM   #75
zakattack62
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London Ontario Ca
Posts: 216
Hi there. Hope I didn't offend in any way. My only point was that Rolex is not the only brand that holds it's value. I feel you need to include Patek as well.
zakattack62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 08:48 AM   #76
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakattack62 View Post
Hi there. Hope I didn't offend in any way. My only point was that Rolex is not the only brand that holds it's value. I feel you need to include Patek as well.
Patek is going downhill - both in terms of value and design.

So, I'll keep Rolex.
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 01:19 PM   #77
zakattack62
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London Ontario Ca
Posts: 216
I'm fortunate enough to own both. Both are great watches. For the record, I prefer Rolex over Patek but you can't slam a Patek watch. There's a reason they sell for the price that they do. Having said that, nothing more solid than a Rolex.




Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
And his statement is wrong as well. Many Rolex hold their value better than many Patek. Sure some Pateks do well but most drop substantially if bought at full retail like most other watches. Does a 5711 Blue 1A hold up well? Sure as does a 116500LN. If you bought a 5270 for retail you took a 35% plus beating like many other Pateks as well. So some hold up well and some not so much. Again just like someone buying a PM Rolex for full retail...Ouch. The same hold true for many if not most brands.
Patek and Rolex happen to be top 2 though overall for retention and marketability due to demand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
Patek is going downhill - both in terms of value and design.

So, I'll keep Rolex.
zakattack62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 06:31 PM   #78
ABChop
"TRF" Member
 
ABChop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 671
I would agree in general. Although there are always exception to the rule.
I no longer try to engage anyone wearing a modern sub in a conversation about watches. I have tried many times and soon realized they knew next to nothing about watches :)
Some are gifts from wives....so bought most likely on advise from salesmen.
Now obviously not all sub wearers are non WIS's ; ) But there's a bunch out there.
__________________
- "M" 16600 Sea-Dweller
- "A" GMT 16700. -“A” 16613LB Sub
- 1680 Red Sub, Mark II, "Full Set"
- 116660 DSSD D-Blue, 124060, 126613LN, 116710BLNR
- 116500LN White Dial - “U” 16610 “SWISS” dial
ABChop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 08:27 PM   #79
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
Patek is going downhill - both in terms of value and design.
I would say the same about Rolex.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 09:45 PM   #80
RKTudor
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Rick
Location: Emmaus, PA
Watch: Tudor 79090 blue
Posts: 298
I didn't have time to read all the posts, but my gut tells me the proper statement is, "people who don't know ANYTHING about watches buy a Datejust and people who know VERY LITTLE about watches buy a Sub.

I have owned both so I'm not putting the models down. I'm just speaking from my personal experiences.

Happy Holidays all!
RKTudor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 10:02 PM   #81
TimeRookie
"TRF" Member
 
TimeRookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by liu_watch View Post
People who don't know about watches - they buy Rolex.

People who know a lot about watches - they buy Rolex.

Cat lovers buy Rolex. Non-cat lovers also buy Rolex.

Successful people buy Rolex.
Pimps buy Rolex.

Therefore, all kinds of people buy Rolex. No need to generalize.


Here is an interesting read:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jackfors.../#132fbd91708e

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks for this article. I liked it!
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present)
116710 GMT Master II BLNR
Seiko Prospex LX SNR031
Pelagos 42mm
Explorer II 226570
TimeRookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 10:05 PM   #82
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,488
Some folk buy Porsches know nothing about cars...

I remember saying to a customer with a Rolex one time "nicewatch, I like a date just!".. his reply- no, it's a Rolex.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 10:41 PM   #83
returntorolex
"TRF" Member
 
returntorolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Jackie Stewart DD
Posts: 5,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnicoJG View Post
I recently read a thread about the Submariner being the go to Rolex for people who don't know watches, however, wouldnt it be more fitting that people who don't know watches get a Rolex?

Over the years I've met several people who want to get a Rolex, but why?
The answer to that can be disputed by many and we all have different opinions.
When I've asked which Rolex do you plan on getting? The answers: don't know, the black one, the white one, the silver one, the one with the longest battery life, I don't know, how many different Rolex are there? Etc,etc.

Some of us love Rolex for the multiple reasons.
Some people just want to wear a Rolex for for the wrong reasons?
Your thoughts?
Phase II in the seven stages of Rolex grief....
__________________
Rolex - Tudor - Omega - Breitling - Oris - Grand Seiko - Timex - Casio - Ocean Crawler - Ganymede - American Waltham - Seiko - Gruen - Arethusa - Citizen - Sinn - Nodus - Formex
returntorolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2016, 10:59 PM   #84
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
And his statement is wrong as well. Many Rolex hold their value better than many Patek. Sure some Pateks do well but most drop substantially if bought at full retail like most other watches. Does a 5711 Blue 1A hold up well? Sure as does a 116500LN. If you bought a 5270 for retail you took a 35% plus beating like many other Pateks as well. So some hold up well and some not so much. Again just like someone buying a PM Rolex for full retail...Ouch. The same hold true for many if not most brands.
Patek and Rolex happen to be top 2 though overall for retention and marketability due to demand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakattack62 View Post
I'm fortunate enough to own both. Both are great watches. For the record, I prefer Rolex over Patek but you can't slam a Patek watch. There's a reason they sell for the price that they do. Having said that, nothing more solid than a Rolex.

Read my post again. Not slamming Patek in any way whatsoever.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2016, 02:33 AM   #85
Dyim
"TRF" Member
 
Dyim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,230
I buy what I want with my own money and my own reasons.

I don't judge or speculate what someone else is wearing on their wrist and their reasons for it.
Dyim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2016, 03:26 AM   #86
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,341
People go through various phases/stages in the watch journey. Some start with other brands and end up at Rolex, whereas others start at Rolex and stay with Rolex and others who who look beyond Rolex and go into more expensive watch brands.

At the end of the day, Rolex is the 800 pound gorilla in the room in terms of production numbers and marketing. They are highly respected within the Swiss watch industry, even by companies who sell more expensive watches. Whether someone buys a Rolex without knowing anything about watches or buys a rare vintage watch at 5x the price of its current production model, there is a place for them all.
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2016, 04:15 AM   #87
liu_watch
"TRF" Member
 
liu_watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyim View Post
I buy what I want with my own money and my own reasons.



I don't judge or speculate what someone else is wearing on their wrist and their reasons for it.


I wish everyone thinks like you, so that we wouldn't have to worry about giving others a "wrong impression". Alas, the world isn't perfect and therefore some of us, salary earners like me, have to be mindful of gossips among superiors and colleagues.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
liu_watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2016, 04:54 AM   #88
srtown
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Everywhere
Watch: 116333 slate dial
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesharkfactor View Post
Some folk buy Porsches know nothing about cars...

I remember saying to a customer with a Rolex one time "nicewatch, I like a date just!".. his reply- no, it's a Rolex.
Holy cow this made me laugh!

That said, every time I buy a car I could say I don't know much about cars.

srtown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2016, 05:05 AM   #89
jmiicustomz
"TRF" Member
 
jmiicustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk25 View Post
The price of entry is right there on the sticker. No degree in horology necessary. And rolex sells a ton. So yeah most will simply wear it and never set foot in a watch forum.

Remember those standardized tests?
Rolex is to nice watch as BMW is to...nice car. And both probably share similar sufferings.

For every thousand 3 series owners, there's always the one who tracks the car, knows what an e46 is, and genuinely despises Chris Bangle.
Love this!!

To know the future is to be trapped by it
jmiicustomz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2016, 05:08 AM   #90
jmiicustomz
"TRF" Member
 
jmiicustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
I'm not sure what the controversy is. Rolex is the biggest Swiss brand, and the Sub is the apparently their biggest selling sport watch (DJ overall.) Whether we're talking about Porsches, Rolex watches, cameras, etc., most people walk in and buy what they hear or read is good.

Forum nerds account for a very small percentage of buyers, so, sure, lots of people buy Rolex (and Subs) who "don't know anything" about watches.
Hey who you calling a nerd?!?!? I resemble that remark! Lol

To know the future is to be trapped by it
jmiicustomz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.