The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: If they were the same price and condition, would you buy a 5711A or 5712A?
5711 52 34.90%
5712 97 65.10%
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 August 2017, 01:01 PM   #61
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
Few bother with 21.6k now, although the Seiko 4R & 6R still do, which gives the latter an almost 50 hours PR with the version of SPRON metal alloy used as the mainspring.
I guess it’s partly to do with the seconds hand jitter, with 28.8k being almost imperceptible, but you can drop to 18k with sub-dial seconds, since the small steps make even its sweep seem smooth.
Your Bovet icon uses 21600? Your other icon Moser is 18000!!!
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2017, 07:55 PM   #62
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
^
Yes, as stated in my quoted reply, there’s no benefit from running at 28.8k on a seconds sub-dial, as the steps are so small compared to when a centre seconds design is employed, resulting in a smooth sweep and extending the power reserve.
The Moser centre seconds are 21.6k, btw.
When you were checking out the Bovet specs, did you happen to notice they offer a 5 year warranty too? That’s a point more worthy of raising than the sweep smoothness.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2017, 07:55 PM   #63
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
[Double post]
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2017, 09:25 PM   #64
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlS View Post
Whats wrong with the 324?...think its in most my watches (5711 / 5524 / 5146 / 5205 / 5167) and never had a problem...
Nothing per se, but it's the entry-level PP movement, and not terribly exciting (to me). I have a 5146 which has this movement. I think the 240 movement is a bit more interesting.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 04:12 AM   #65
Russell996
2024 Pledge Member
 
Russell996's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 4,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
Nothing per se, but it's the entry-level PP movement, and not terribly exciting (to me). I have a 5146 which has this movement. I think the 240 movement is a bit more interesting.
I'm interested to understand what you consider makes a movement entry level when complications are added as modules to a base movement.
Vph? Number of parts? Something else?

Clearly the 5711 uses the base version of the 324 and the 5712 uses a 240 with added complications- that isn't an argument for one base movement or the other being entry level.
If you want the complications it is of course paramount to have the added modules - 5726 takes it up a further stage again with an annual calendar using 324 movement.
Russell996 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 04:26 AM   #66
jonathan17
"TRF" Member
 
jonathan17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: jon
Location: Singapore
Watch: ??? Yes please!
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
Nothing per se, but it's the entry-level PP movement, and not terribly exciting (to me). I have a 5146 which has this movement. I think the 240 movement is a bit more interesting.
I agree, happy to see 240 movements used in grand complications i think its the thin profile that wins it for me.
jonathan17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 07:47 AM   #67
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell996 View Post
I'm interested to understand what you consider makes a movement entry level when complications are added as modules to a base movement.
Vph? Number of parts? Something else?

Clearly the 5711 uses the base version of the 324 and the 5712 uses a 240 with added complications- that isn't an argument for one base movement or the other being entry level.
If you want the complications it is of course paramount to have the added modules - 5726 takes it up a further stage again with an annual calendar using 324 movement.
It's the elegance of the overall architecture of the movement. The recessed micro-rotor is what does it for me.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 08:02 AM   #68
Russell996
2024 Pledge Member
 
Russell996's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 4,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
It's the elegance of the overall architecture of the movement. The recessed micro-rotor is what does it for me.
I can agree with that - it is super elegant.
Russell996 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 09:27 AM   #69
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell996 View Post
I can agree with that - it is super elegant.
Agreed, really wish I had one on mine.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 01:22 PM   #70
KarlS
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Karl
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 5,228
I found most PPmovements to be be pretty pedestrian...do the job but definately don't bother with a loupe
KarlS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 03:19 PM   #71
mineral
"TRF" Member
 
mineral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
5711 for me as I prefer the higher water resistance on 5711.
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight
mineral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 03:23 PM   #72
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by mineral View Post
5711 for me as I prefer the higher water resistance on 5711.
you go diving in a 5711

In any other situation the functional difference is just an abstract thought experiment.
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 03:28 PM   #73
mineral
"TRF" Member
 
mineral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
Swimming...



For example during hotel stay, I would rather wear it than keep it the hotel safe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
you go diving in a 5711

In any other situation the functional difference is just an abstract thought experiment.
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight
mineral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 09:21 PM   #74
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
5712
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.