The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 February 2018, 08:18 AM   #1
Buckeye4life
"TRF" Member
 
Buckeye4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Steve
Location: Little Rock, AR
Watch: Z blue Milgauss
Posts: 207
Why not Rolex? Doesn’t make sense

I typically don’t care what watch anyone chooses to wear, but being a person who notices such things, it baffles me that the two people below both choose not to wear a Rolex. I’m a fan of Urban Meyer and Nick Saban as leaders and highly successful people in their field and even try to instill their leadership methods in what I do in my job (I only cheer for the Buckeyes on the football field). Both men have nice suits, nice cars, and nice homes. So it really perplexes me that they don’t wear a Rolex. What makes it even stranger, is that they both wear the same $99 Fossil watch. Does anyone else notice these things or give them a second thought? What if Paul Newman hadn’t worn a Daytona? What if Steve McQueen hadn’t worn a Sub? What if they had both worn the same Timex instead? Anyway, just a random thought that’s not another Rolex supply rumor.

IMG_1027.JPG


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________

2016 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue
2015 Frederique Constant FC715H4S6 Manufacture Moon Phase
2015 Seiko SARG017
Buckeye4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:21 AM   #2
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
Because they do not care about watches?
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:24 AM   #3
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
Brace yourself...this is going to be shocking.

Some people actually don't think spending thousands of dollars on a watch is a good idea.

Gasp...I know. Blasphemy. There I said it.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:25 AM   #4
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 4,975
People generally don’t like how much these coaches make, especially compared to professors and the presidents of the universities they work for. The football and basketball coaches are usually the highest paid. Under that scrutiny I can see why they would choose to wear an inexpensive watch, at least in public. Seems like the minority wears expensive watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:26 AM   #5
Buckeye4life
"TRF" Member
 
Buckeye4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Steve
Location: Little Rock, AR
Watch: Z blue Milgauss
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
Because they do not care about watches?
You would think, but people that don't care about cars still drive a Merc or BMW. You don't see many millionaires driving Kias (no offense to Kia, my wife owns a Kia).
__________________

2016 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue
2015 Frederique Constant FC715H4S6 Manufacture Moon Phase
2015 Seiko SARG017
Buckeye4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:28 AM   #6
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye4life View Post
What makes it even stranger, is that they both wear the same $99 Fossil watch.
Well, wearing a Fossil never makes sense, imo. However, if they'd been wearing performance-specific, inexpensive watches like a G-Shock, I'd say they're just choosing practicality over style for their work environments, and maybe wear nicer watches off the job. In light of the Fossils, though, I'm inclined to side with those who say these guys aren't watch people.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:28 AM   #7
Reddy_Kilowatt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: NW USA
Watch: 16220 & 216570
Posts: 392
"Doesn't make sense"? What a strange thought.
Reddy_Kilowatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:28 AM   #8
henrylee
"TRF" Member
 
henrylee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,214
Who cares if they wear fossils? I'm sure they have nice Rolex watches at home.
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021
henrylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:30 AM   #9
rw2008
"TRF" Member
 
rw2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex AP Patek
Posts: 659
Only their players get high-end jewelry.

;)
rw2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:31 AM   #10
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye4life View Post
I typically don’t care what watch anyone chooses to wear, but being a person who notices such things, it baffles me that the two people below both choose not to wear a Rolex.
What if they were wearing AP or PP? Would you still be baffled? Or are you really puzzled that these guys opt not to wear higher-end watches, rather than specifically Rolex?
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:32 AM   #11
lecorsaire
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,541
The Italian national team’s coach Antonio Conte wore a white 116520 exclusively throughout the Euro 2016. Some people don’t care about watches. George W. Bush wore a Timex throughout his presidency.
__________________
Rolex 116710 BLNR
Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons
lecorsaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:33 AM   #12
rossi46
"TRF" Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Brace yourself...this is going to be shocking.

Some people actually don't think spending thousands of dollars on a watch is a good idea.
Quoted because I think it needs to be said again. Maybe as a sticky on this forum.

OP: Rolex watches are not the end-all, be-all. Thinking that, unless multi-millionaires like these two own a Rolex they're somehow falling short of their potential in life, is weird.

It's just a watch.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:34 AM   #13
rossi46
"TRF" Member
 
rossi46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecorsaire View Post
The Italian national team’s coach Antonio Conte wore a white 116520 exclusively throughout the Euro 2016.
He still wears one as coach of Chelsea FC.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob
rossi46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:38 AM   #14
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye4life View Post
You would think, but people that don't care about cars still drive a Merc or BMW. You don't see many millionaires driving Kias (no offense to Kia, my wife owns a Kia).
I am guessing you never read the book "Millionaire Next Door" from this post.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:41 AM   #15
lecorsaire
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye4life View Post
You would think, but people that don't care about cars still drive a Merc or BMW. You don't see many millionaires driving Kias (no offense to Kia, my wife owns a Kia).
Cars are different. They have not been made obsolete by some other tech. There is no substitute for a well made car which is exactly what Mercedes and BMW are. They are not really seen as luxurious in Europe as they are abroad. They are sold in lots of smaller engine configurations and also with cloth seats. I’m not sure if cloth seats are still available but even the S class could be ordered with cloth seats believe it or not.

When I drove across the German border into Basel with my dad, I only saw MB, BMW and Audi’s. I made a comment about this to my dad and he told me,” What other cars are they supposed to buy? There aren’t many other options.” The fact is that Swiss watches are not a necessity in this era they way they were 5 decades ago when you needed one if you wanted a precise watch.
__________________
Rolex 116710 BLNR
Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons
lecorsaire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:42 AM   #16
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
I am guessing you never read the book "Millionaire Next Door" from this post.
Good point. How would one even know the socioeconomic status of someone driving a Kia? Maybe we see a lot of millionaires driving Kias, and just have no idea.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:43 AM   #17
Syed117
"TRF" Member
 
Syed117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
What a strange thread.

It's like something an observer from a different world might think.

I know plenty of people with the means to buy a Rolex, but they don't. Most don't. They just don't care.

As a little side note, the most well off person I personally know, lives in an incredible home, has plenty of nice cars, but wears a citizen and I've seen him with holes in his socks during parties in his home.

He is incredibly well spoken, educated, and most importantly humble, but unless you saw his house or cars, you could never guess.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58
Syed117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:44 AM   #18
r8t3d_M
"TRF" Member
 
r8t3d_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Felipe
Location: NYC
Watch: Me ;)
Posts: 2,894
Perhaps they do have a Rolex or other luxury brand watch at home and choose not to wear it during practice or games.
r8t3d_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:47 AM   #19
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
To start with, I think you give these guys too much credit. They’re hardly doing anything to help people or make the world a better place. A Fossil fits them well.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:49 AM   #20
PLNYC
"TRF" Member
 
PLNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,683
I think they prefer rings
__________________
PLNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:51 AM   #21
Portzed
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bryden
Location: Lincolnshire - UK
Watch: My 1st 60's Timex
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
I am guessing you never read the book "Millionaire Next Door" from this post.
Perhaps they are millionaires due to NOT purchasing expensive cars and watches
Portzed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 08:59 AM   #22
THC
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 16610M
Posts: 10,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLNYC View Post
I think they prefer rings
best post
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:01 AM   #23
RightYouAreKen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecorsaire View Post
Cars are different. They have not been made obsolete by some other tech. There is no substitute for a well made car which is exactly what Mercedes and BMW are. They are not really seen as luxurious in Europe as they are abroad. They are sold in lots of smaller engine configurations and also with cloth seats. I’m not sure if cloth seats are still available but even the S class could be ordered with cloth seats believe it or not.

When I drove across the German border into Basel with my dad, I only saw MB, BMW and Audi’s. I made a comment about this to my dad and he told me,” What other cars are they supposed to buy? There aren’t many other options.” The fact is that Swiss watches are not a necessity in this era they way they were 5 decades ago when you needed one if you wanted a precise watch.
I think this is spot on. It doesn't take a car enthusiast to be able to spot (or feel) the difference between a BMW/Merc/Audi and a Camry. They are expensive because they have more features, comfort, and performance. They do many things better than a Camry.

A Rolex, on the other hand, tells WORSE time than a Fossil (probably). We buy them because we appreciate the engineering, the prestige, the history, etc. But, I think even we'd admit that they don't do anything that a cheaper watch doesn't do just as well. Therefore, those who don't really care about watches, just need something to tell the time and look a bit sporty.
RightYouAreKen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:06 AM   #24
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Brace yourself...this is going to be shocking.

Some people actually don't think spending thousands of dollars on a watch is a good idea.

Gasp...I know. Blasphemy. There I said it.
This ^^^

Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
I am guessing you never read the book "Millionaire Next Door" from this post.
And this ^^^
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:06 AM   #25
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Rolex no longer a tool watch. Only a few of us fit their profile one of them being well off and well established individuals. It is now jewlery and the market target a different one than that used many decades ago.
ALF61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:07 AM   #26
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,380
It is my understanding that both Meyer and Saban do the exact same thing:

They start out the year with one of every Rolex made (SS and PM), but by the time recruiting season is over, they are out of watches!

(Go blue! )
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:19 AM   #27
laxplyr85
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
+1
laxplyr85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:21 AM   #28
laxplyr85
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by rw2008 View Post
only their players get high-end jewelry.

;)
+1
laxplyr85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:28 AM   #29
ronricks
2024 Pledge Member
 
ronricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,645
College Football coaches who I have noticed wear a Rolex during the games:

Will Muschamp
Larry Fedora
Kevin Sumlin
Gus Malzahn
Frank Beamer
ronricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 09:35 AM   #30
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,345
There's nothing wrong with wearing a Fossil watch, regardless of one's financial status, or even one's appreciation for watches in general.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.