ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JohnGingerwood · 12 October 2019, 05:55 AM

So, my 114060 is running just under 10 seconds fast. I set it perfectly about 9 days ago and over the course has picked up 9-10 seconds. I can live with it, but is something wrong mechanically?

MattPegler · 12 October 2019, 05:57 AM

1 second per day. It's fine.

Nairn1980 · 12 October 2019, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

So, my 114060 is running just under 10 seconds fast. I set it perfectly about 9 days ago and over the course has picked up 9-10 seconds. I can live with it, but is something wrong mechanically?

That’s a watch keeping amazing time.

robjohna · 12 October 2019, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nairn1980

That’s a watch keeping amazing time.

That’s running well

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

schoolboy · 12 October 2019, 06:44 AM

So a second per day?

Your watch is running extremely well.

jedy617 · 12 October 2019, 07:10 AM

sillo · 12 October 2019, 07:53 AM

As others have said 1 second/day is incredibly accurate for a mechanical watch.

Tempusfugit77 · 12 October 2019, 08:21 AM

Rolex specifies + or - 2 seconds per day, so your watch is within spec, and as others have said, this is quite accurate for a mechanical watch. If you take your watch off at night, you can try leaving it on it’s side (crown up or crown down). This will likely make it run slower at night and it will lose some of the time it gains.

No SUBctitute · 12 October 2019, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

So, my 114060 is running just under 10 seconds fast. I set it perfectly about 9 days ago and over the course has picked up 9-10 seconds. I can live with it, but is something wrong mechanically?

Fantastic time! How long have you had your watch? Have you measured it multiple times? Let's see some pics!

Onikage · 12 October 2019, 08:26 AM

What if your iphone is wrong and the watch is 100% +/-0 seconds a week?

Nikrnic · 12 October 2019, 08:30 AM

Near Perfecto, well within cosc. I'd take that any day of the week. Better fast than slow, you'll never be late...

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

mfm22 · 12 October 2019, 10:26 AM

As said that's beyond expectations

Try regulating watch by positioning it at rest ( nights)

In general face up -faster. Face down -slower. Etc..

mmaggi · 12 October 2019, 11:18 AM

othertbone · 12 October 2019, 11:41 AM

That's better than Rolex has promised

Easy E · 12 October 2019, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfm22

As said that's beyond expectations

Try regulating watch by positioning it at rest ( nights)

In general face up -faster. Face down -slower. Etc..

It’s going to be tough to get better than the stated +1. Just sayin’.

kevo88 · 12 October 2019, 12:33 PM

Interesting

Thenwcomr · 12 October 2019, 01:31 PM

spec is +/- 2 sec/day, so this is normal. Even if it were 20 seconds fast at this point rolex wouldn't touch it. They would simply tell you it's normal. At the 30 day mark your watch can be up to 2 minutes fast or slow. Any more than that and then you can take it in.

jedy617 · 12 October 2019, 02:59 PM

Have you ever owned a mechanical watch, and have you checked the advertised specs for the watch? Why are some of you guys the way you are?

Soultime · 12 October 2019, 03:30 PM

If you work for a time critical department at NASA then get a quartz watch.

..... Otherwise be thankful that you have an amazing mechanical watch that is accurate to within 1:86,400

214270Explorer · 12 October 2019, 03:38 PM

This deviation is NOT an issue with what it is designed to do.

joli160 · 12 October 2019, 04:23 PM

Really?

jedy617 · 12 October 2019, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joli160

Really?

I'm convinced there are just tons of troll posts lately. They don't even reply back.

jimcameron · 12 October 2019, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

I can live with it, but is something wrong mechanically?

Go quartz next time.

uncleluck · 12 October 2019, 06:28 PM

Everyone who has a mechanical watch should go and learn about the movement and what it’s actually doing thousands and thousands of times an hour! Nearly 7 million beats since you set the time from a mechanical device that can vary depending on position and it’s gained 10 secs! So gained one second every 691,000 beats. That’s a triumph of engineering.

padi56 · 12 October 2019, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

So, my 114060 is running just under 10 seconds fast. I set it perfectly about 9 days ago and over the course has picked up 9-10 seconds. I can live with it, but is something wrong mechanically?

The only thing wrong is the owner of said watch,instead of posting this post asking if something wrong, you should be jumping and singing how accurate your watch is.

Ian Macdermott · 12 October 2019, 07:06 PM

Good grief.

JohnGingerwood · 13 October 2019, 11:44 AM

Lol ok sorry. Thanks everyone!

Soultime · 13 October 2019, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

Lol ok sorry. Thanks everyone!

You won't be worrying about the second a day anymore now

sinkholeninja · 13 October 2019, 04:54 PM

Ever since I added PAM 372 to my collection, which doesn't have the seconds hand, I stopped obsessing over +/- accuracy of my other watches. My advice to you would be to stop timing & enjoy wearing more.

HogwldFLTR · 13 October 2019, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGingerwood

Lol ok sorry. Thanks everyone!

With Rolex spec being +/- 2 seconds/day and your complaint being about 10 seconds over 9 days, I'd recommend paying better attention during math class. Just consider how fast it would be after a year?? You could write that the watch is running 6 minutes fast.

12 October 2019, 05:55 AM	#1
JohnGingerwood 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2019 Real Name: Zach Location: USA Posts: 1,481	10 Seconds Fast?! So, my 114060 is running just under 10 seconds fast. I set it perfectly about 9 days ago and over the course has picked up 9-10 seconds. I can live with it, but is something wrong mechanically?

12 October 2019, 07:53 AM	#7
sillo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Sean Location: NY Watch: 5 Digit Posts: 2,840	As others have said 1 second/day is incredibly accurate for a mechanical watch. __________________ 14060 \| 16570 \| 16600 \| 16700 \| 16800 \| 79260 @TheGMTHand

12 October 2019, 08:26 AM	#10
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,758	What if your iphone is wrong and the watch is 100% +/-0 seconds a week? __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

12 October 2019, 03:38 PM	#20
214270Explorer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: United States Watch: me buy Watches Posts: 3,955	This deviation is NOT an issue with what it is designed to do. __________________ “The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some"

12 October 2019, 04:23 PM	#21
joli160 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,352	Really? __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

12 October 2019, 05:57 AM	#2
MattPegler "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: United Kingdom Watch: 116000 Blue Dial Posts: 192	1 second per day. It's fine.

12 October 2019, 06:44 AM	#5
schoolboy Banned Join Date: Nov 2017 Real Name: Jesus Location: Texas Watch: 116234 Posts: 8,721	So a second per day? Your watch is running extremely well.

12 October 2019, 07:10 AM	#6
jedy617 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Jeremy Location: Chicago Watch: Omega/Rolex Posts: 245

12 October 2019, 08:21 AM	#8
Tempusfugit77 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2019 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 28	Rolex specifies + or - 2 seconds per day, so your watch is within spec, and as others have said, this is quite accurate for a mechanical watch. If you take your watch off at night, you can try leaving it on it’s side (crown up or crown down). This will likely make it run slower at night and it will lose some of the time it gains.

12 October 2019, 08:30 AM	#11
Nikrnic "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Louis Nick Ric Location: Michigan, USA Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs, Posts: 10,159	Near Perfecto, well within cosc. I'd take that any day of the week. Better fast than slow, you'll never be late... Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

12 October 2019, 10:26 AM	#12
mfm22 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Real Name: Mike Location: NY Watch: Explorer 1 Posts: 488	As said that's beyond expectations Try regulating watch by positioning it at rest ( nights) In general face up -faster. Face down -slower. Etc..

12 October 2019, 11:18 AM	#13
mmaggi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2019 Real Name: Michael Location: Nassau County, NY Watch: 16710 Posts: 889

12 October 2019, 11:41 AM	#14
othertbone Banned Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: Florida, USA Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega Posts: 1,972	That's better than Rolex has promised

12 October 2019, 12:33 PM	#16
kevo88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: MIAMI Posts: 23	Interesting

12 October 2019, 01:31 PM	#17
Thenwcomr "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Real Name: magneeleVE Location: Usa Watch: magneeleVE Posts: 5	spec is +/- 2 sec/day, so this is normal. Even if it were 20 seconds fast at this point rolex wouldn't touch it. They would simply tell you it's normal. At the 30 day mark your watch can be up to 2 minutes fast or slow. Any more than that and then you can take it in.

12 October 2019, 02:59 PM	#18
jedy617 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Jeremy Location: Chicago Watch: Omega/Rolex Posts: 245	Have you ever owned a mechanical watch, and have you checked the advertised specs for the watch? Why are some of you guys the way you are?

12 October 2019, 03:30 PM	#19
Soultime "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Cheshire UK Posts: 1,066	If you work for a time critical department at NASA then get a quartz watch. ..... Otherwise be thankful that you have an amazing mechanical watch that is accurate to within 1:86,400

12 October 2019, 06:28 PM	#24
uncleluck "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: England Posts: 518	Everyone who has a mechanical watch should go and learn about the movement and what it’s actually doing thousands and thousands of times an hour! Nearly 7 million beats since you set the time from a mechanical device that can vary depending on position and it’s gained 10 secs! So gained one second every 691,000 beats. That’s a triumph of engineering.

12 October 2019, 07:06 PM	#26
Ian Macdermott "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Willy.B.Banned Location: Sheol Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 2,721	Good grief. __________________ Welax no one other than wobblers muggers and sad WIS types notices your Wolex. The rest of the populace are way too busy staring at their shiny new iPhone 24s or worrying about paying the gas bill..

13 October 2019, 11:44 AM	#27
JohnGingerwood 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2019 Real Name: Zach Location: USA Posts: 1,481	Lol ok sorry. Thanks everyone!

13 October 2019, 04:54 PM	#29
sinkholeninja "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Real Name: Zeus Location: London Watch: Ocean 2000 Posts: 975	Ever since I added PAM 372 to my collection, which doesn't have the seconds hand, I stopped obsessing over +/- accuracy of my other watches. My advice to you would be to stop timing & enjoy wearing more. __________________ Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)