ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 February 2016, 03:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 564
|
Blue dial 5960p vs 5905p?
Haven't been able to see the 5905 in the metal - on a list with my AD and am guessing sometime in calendar 2016 but not a certainty. The 5960p blue dial is pretty sweet and they are available. Am interested in opinions from those who have seen both. Of note, I sold my 5205R because it seemed small and thick. The 5960 has a bit bigger dial and the pushers give it better proportions than the 5205, but certainly the 5905 will wear bigger. Thoughts?
|
17 February 2016, 03:59 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 43
|
Why would you consider the 5960? It is discontinued, the prices on the used market have done nothing but plummet and are now being offered at 50k which is nearly a 50% discount from retail price.
5905 all day every day, this is a no brainer. |
17 February 2016, 04:15 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Seattle
Posts: 787
|
5905 must be great. I would wait. I like the 5960 too but the 5905 seems nicer IMHO and I wouldn't risk regretting a purchase at this price level (not that the 5960 isn't nicer, but if you buy it and then realized you'd rather have the 5905, that would be bad).
|
17 February 2016, 04:17 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
|
I tried on the 5905 and its larger than the 5960, too big for my 6 1/2" wrist, the lugs hung over, it's also pretty thick so it could get banged pretty easily. 5960 you get better chrono counter, power reserve, and I think it looks sportier, the 5905 is dressy.
|
17 February 2016, 04:43 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Paradise
Watch: on the dark side
Posts: 543
|
Personally, I much more prefer the manually wound 5170G over the references 5905 and 5960.
The movement, case, dial, size and thickness, i.e. everything of the 5170 is superior imho. |
17 February 2016, 06:05 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
great, but the op isn't asking about the 5170...
__________________
Instagram: soundsoserious |
17 February 2016, 06:30 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,182
|
I've seen and tried on both at an AD. Both are very nice, but both are very thick, IMHO. I like the size of the 5960p better if I had to choose between the two. Before deciding, try them on as many times as possible to make sure the thickness is acceptable to you.
Good luck! |
17 February 2016, 06:52 AM | #8 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,900
|
Quote:
Typically buying at 50% off is good and one might expect the 5905 to behave similarly, in which case ouch. That said, I like the 5905 aesthetically speaking as I'm not fond of the pushers on the 5960. |
|
17 February 2016, 07:19 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,848
|
Quote:
|
|
17 February 2016, 08:08 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,031
|
Quote:
For that matter your exquisite 5950 avatar would be my choice
__________________
|
|
17 February 2016, 08:10 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,031
|
Quote:
No amount of web browsing can give you the information that 5 minutes on your wrist will provide.
__________________
|
|
17 February 2016, 08:13 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
|
|
17 February 2016, 08:14 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
|
|
17 February 2016, 10:11 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,303
|
I have to say I love the 5960 - one of my all time favorites.
Had a chance to play with 5905 at an AD in SLC while traveling. It was a black dial and I thought the size was awesome and it wore perfectly on my 7-ish inch wrist. Love the presence and the way it looked. Size and pushers being the main difference between the two... If I remember correctly it was a 79k retail? Vs 95k last retail on 5960. But as many have said the 5960 can be had easily in the 50k range. |
17 February 2016, 10:45 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,278
|
5905.
|
17 February 2016, 10:51 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 6,008
|
Quote:
I owned the 5960p black dial and definitely prefer the fit and design of the 5905. |
|
17 February 2016, 11:20 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
|
5905
|
17 February 2016, 12:37 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 43
|
Previous poster responded: Get it used grey dial in the 45-50k MINT complete and you got a fantastic watch.
Ok, agreed it is a fantastic watch that with all certainty will only continue to depreciate. Almost no PP's sell for 50% off of retail preowned and especially ones that have been discontinued. Discontinued models tend to appreciate, but the 5960's have just continued to fall. I've never witnessed anything like that. The 5905, apart from the cosmetic differences of square pushers, larger size etc, has a much better chance of retaining its value and possibly APPRECIATING when it is discontinued. I cannot grasp how a watch that is essentially a dog is a "steal" at 50% off of retail. Its not a steal if no one wants it. I project the watch to be selling in the low 40's by the end of the year because there are so many for sale and so few buyers that dealers will ultimately take a beating to free up cash to buy watches they can make a profit on. |
17 February 2016, 12:59 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: East and West
Posts: 1,894
|
I had the 5905 black dial on my wrist yesterday. And I owned the 5205 in the past. The 5905 didn't wow me. The font on the sub-dial seemed too bold in regards to the other aspects of the watch, and the weight and thickness were considerable. Perfectly nice watch, but nothing about it sung to me. I prefer the parents - 5205 and 5960.
|
17 February 2016, 10:28 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
I know the grey dial is around at 50k, but the blue dial? I don't think so. |
|
17 February 2016, 11:06 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 43
|
You will notice that nearly all sellers list a price and "best offer" so, it isn't really fair to say that none are listed at 50% off but you can bet that if you send them an offer of $50k they will accept. I am not in the market for one or in the business of wasting time asking for a discount knowing that I am not interested in buying it but, go ahead and try any one of these sellers and see..
Asking 69,999 about 30% off and accepting offers.. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Patek-Philip...AAAOSwEeFVQj1B Asking $61,000 about 38% off http://www.chrono24.com/en/patekphil...-id4050094.htm Asking $64,900 about 34% off http://www.chrono24.com/en/patekphil...-id4050977.htm I won't disagree with you that the blue dials are trading at a premium to the grey dials, they always did as blue dial and PP are considered their "classic" combination and have always commanded a premium. It is my opinion that the blue dials were also produced in limited numbers when compared to the grey dials which had a longer production run. They are also the color that PP uses almost exclusively on their platinum/wg models so that could also be a factor. |
18 February 2016, 11:47 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
5906 in a second. The pushers alone are worth it and not to mention new price point.
|
19 February 2016, 05:44 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 564
|
Thickness per se doesn't bother me and sportiness of the 5960 is for me a plus. Am worried about whether the dial will feel too small. Have a number of Chronos over 13mm and they fit fine - including this one.
|
19 February 2016, 06:06 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 281
|
|
19 February 2016, 06:07 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,900
|
I think it's a mistake to assume a modern Patek will appreciate aside from a handful of exceptions. If you buy a 5905 anywhere near retail, I would guess it will cost you tens of thousands over the next 5 years.
|
19 February 2016, 06:10 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
|
19 February 2016, 06:33 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,099
|
After seeing the datograph on your wrist the 5960 dial would be way too small. You could easily wear the 5905. My opinion has changed.
|
19 February 2016, 07:48 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 564
|
Quote:
Thank you - that is my concern as well. I will definitely wait to see a 5905 in the metal. |
|
19 February 2016, 10:43 AM | #29 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,900
|
Quote:
That said, I think the 5205r is the exception and not the rule with PP. As I believe Ken (HL65) has put it in the past, patek can be a tale of two cities. The 5205r enjoys strong demand alongside a handful of others like the 5711/5167 and the obvious home runs 5131 etc. In retrospect tens of thousands sounds steep but I have no doubt you could lose 10-15k. |
|
19 February 2016, 01:50 PM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.