Which one of these two Daytonas white gold.

[Golfbone]

Originally Posted by myc ritz

#1 but it will probably cost 75% more.

75% more??? I think not!

[Daytonaman799]

Racing panda for me

[babado]

Both great looking watches. #2 for me. It’s also much rarer

[steeevvvooo]

Originally Posted by Golfbone

75% more??? I think not!

#2 regularly goes for low to mid $20s. I have bought and sold one in that context in the last 12-18 months. I think the black and white racing dials were less popular for whatever reason, and the new dials seem to be holding their value. It's an odd disparity in my opinion, which is why I bought the racing dial :)


edit: Thinking about it further it's probably just down to age. The one you listed is "UNWORN" and I think this dial is discontinued so unworn models may be listed high because of that? Low to mid 20k has generally been the ask for excellent condition preowned white racing dials in recent times.

[nachopc]

Originally Posted by steeevvvooo

#2 regularly goes for low to mid $20s. I have bought and sold one in that context in the last 12-18 months. I think the black and white racing dials were less popular for whatever reason, and the new dials seem to be holding their value. It's an odd disparity in my opinion, which is why I bought the racing dial :)


edit: Thinking about it further it's probably just down to age. The one you listed is "UNWORN" and I think this dial is discontinued so unworn models may be listed high because of that? Low to mid 20k has generally been the ask for excellent condition preowned white racing dials in recent times.

Yes but not for the Panda dial, you can buy for 20k many racing dials but not the Panda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Giangos]

Number 1 for me and it’s not even close!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[fskywalker]

#2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[BOXMAN76]

#1

[KeithP]

Racing dial.

[just1time]

#1 by 1000000miles.
#2 just has too much going on in my opinion. Never been a fan of watches with numbers. Love the sticks

[DC116710LN]

1

[AML]

#1

[GolfPunk]

Originally Posted by nachopc

I have the opinion from some members, wanna know yours,

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I have number 2 and I love it but I’d be happy with either.

[nachopc]

Originally Posted by GolfPunk

I have number 2 and I love it but I’d be happy with either.

I decided yesterday number 2, my wife has the same dial in the oyster flex.

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[nachopc]

I understand guys all your comments, finally I decided number 2. My wife has the WG Oysterflex and I think is better to have something a bit different.

Thank you all !!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[doramas]

the 1st one.

[garyk]

Pandas are awesome, Daytona Pandas are off the charts awesome!!!

[Case61]

I own #1, and love it to pieces. Gorgeous dial, yet low-key.

[steeevvvooo]

Congrats on the choice OP. I'm sure you will love it!!

Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk

[accountank2000]

I like the contrast of the subdials on the lighter dial of #2, but agree with others that with the three hands, three subdials, three subdial hands, chronograph bezel and branded rehaut, there isn't really enough space to throw arabic numbers in there as well without it looking too busy. You can tell there isn't enough space, because they had to give up after only doing 8 out of 12 of them. :) The stick markers are a cleaner look. So I would have gone #1.

Originally Posted by nachopc

I understand guys all your comments, finally I decided number 2. My wife has the WG Oysterflex and I think is better to have something a bit different.

If you had told us earlier that your wife had the WG oysterflex with the same dial, I think you might have converted more people say go for #2 instead of their first choice of #1, as it might be a bit strange walking round looking like twins.

They're both nice watches - enjoy!

[nachopc]

Originally Posted by accountank2000

I like the contrast of the subdials on the lighter dial of #2, but agree with others that with the three hands, three subdials, three subdial hands, chronograph bezel and branded rehaut, there isn't really enough space to throw arabic numbers in there as well without it looking too busy. You can tell there isn't enough space, because they had to give up after only doing 8 out of 12 of them. :) The stick markers are a cleaner look. So I would have gone #1.







If you had told us earlier that your wife had the WG oysterflex with the same dial, I think you might have converted more people say go for #2 instead of their first choice of #1, as it might be a bit strange walking round looking like twins.



They're both nice watches - enjoy!

I fully understand your point, when you see the watch live, you barely see the numbers they are melted with the dial color. I see the subdial contrast and the main hands. -:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Deep18]

#1. Dial is busy enough without the numerals.

[replicator]

Both are nice, but the Racing dial is more unique and legible.

[Strummer25]

Sticks dial other ones not even close

[Manu74]

1st

[cure]

No 2 for me. Not easy to find arabic anymore and looks great


Tapatalk kullanarak iPhone aracılığıyla gönderildi

[MichelleP]

Originally Posted by Oxfordian

Number 1 simply because the Daytona dial is small and the Arabic's on watch 2 make the watch look cluttered compared to number 1

this

[Simon_jrees]

Originally Posted by nachopc

I have the opinion from some members, wanna know yours,

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

#1 for me.

[dukie748]

Numero Uno, not even close.

[nachopc]

26 people prefer this Racing Panda vs 40 people that prefer the slate grey.

I finally decided to go for the Panda.........


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro