ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 September 2017, 01:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: US
Posts: 501
|
Two things I'd change on the Daytona
I'm a big Daytona fan. I wear mine more than all my other watches, combined. But still there are two small, presumably easy and inexpensive things that could be done to it to make it better.
1. Anti-reflective coating on the underside of the crystal. Why hide the beautiful dial in glare? Topside AR smudges too much, so I'd prefer only underside. It's frankly embarrassing for a five-figure watch not to have AR coating these days. Especially when the dial is glossy; sometimes the dial or hands will reflect off the underside of the crystal, onto the glossy dial, back onto the underside of the crystal, back onto the dial...it's like a funhouse mirror effect. 2. Re-do the ticks between the minute markers.There are 5 ticks per minute marker. But the Daytona ticks 8x/second. Let's have four ticks per minute marker, so the chrono second hand, you know, can actually be read to its 1/8 second capability. This is really just an academic exercise, because Rolex does what Rolex wants. But these two changes would make the Daytona perfect. Thoughts? |
15 September 2017, 01:24 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Parth
Location: Los Angeles & SD
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 577
|
AR coating cracks/wears over time, I think that's why Rolex refrains from using it whilst it's competitors don't. Rolexes make watches that last a lifetime.
|
15 September 2017, 01:27 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Julian
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Rolex 116613LB
Posts: 1,908
|
That's a pretty cool pic. I love the 1 second exposure to capture the points of movement of the second hand. Did you shoot that pic? If so, kudos. It's a fantastic shot.
3) I would add that it is a little on the small size. I've tried on the Daytona and always find it just looks small on my wrist. I love the chronograph movement but I would prefer that it had just a little more presence on the wrist. |
15 September 2017, 01:32 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,472
|
Quote:
As someone with smaller wrists (6.5") I actually love the size of the Daytona and wouldn't want it to ever change! AR coating on the underside of the crystal would be nice. One more change I'll add (but truly would never happen): sapphire crystal caseback. I want to see that 4130!
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
|
15 September 2017, 01:35 AM | #5 | ||
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Julian
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Rolex 116613LB
Posts: 1,908
|
Quote:
Quote:
Fixed my post. |
||
15 September 2017, 01:43 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,384
|
Damn, I didn't even notice that. That is very cool!!!
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016) |
15 September 2017, 01:46 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
How about removing a little of the unnecessary text? Top of the dial reads like a novel.
|
15 September 2017, 01:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: sf
Watch: 116500LN White
Posts: 1,844
|
I think the size ins perfect IMHO I hope they don't change it.
|
15 September 2017, 02:48 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
the 1/4 resolution makes quite a bit of sense. great pic!
|
15 September 2017, 02:51 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NH
Watch: your mouth!
Posts: 384
|
Curious about this too.
__________________
Rolex: 114060LN, 116710BLNR, 116613LN, 16710BLRO A-Series, 116610LV Tudor: Black Bay GMT (M79830RB) Omega: Planet Ocean 39.5mm (215.30.40.20.03.001) |
15 September 2017, 02:53 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Kristofer
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: my feet.
Posts: 2,364
|
I LOVE my '520.
__________________
No sticker left behind. "Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late." "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us." ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014 |
15 September 2017, 02:57 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
|
|
15 September 2017, 02:58 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
Crystals are not expensive to replace and modern coatings are very good. AR coating makes a world of difference when it comes to legibility. I would remove the words "superlative chronometer officially certified" Just "chronometer" is fine. The other three words are an exercise in excess. |
|
15 September 2017, 03:07 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 253
|
I like the glare.
|
15 September 2017, 03:20 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: britain
Posts: 712
|
It is a beautiful watch but i wish Rolex would pay more attention to their dial printing.
Not being picky here but the sub dials printing is all over the place. The black numerals and lines are too far over to the right, it is something that should be correct. But it is still a beauty. |
15 September 2017, 04:00 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: US
Posts: 501
|
|
15 September 2017, 04:01 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Tony
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: RG Skydweller
Posts: 1,469
|
I owned a Daytona for a few months but flipped it because it was too small and almost illegible (at 60, my eyesight is not the greatest)
I'd change a few things: I created this picture a few months ago and posted it on a concept thread. This would be my ideal Daytona. I'd also like to increase the size and lose some of the text but also darken and thicken the hands and indices. I added a red tip and lightened the sub-dials too. The date wheel is probably blasphemous, but, hey, why not? |
15 September 2017, 04:06 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Id change the price and availability. Otherwise i think its perect.
Date complication isnt needed on a watch.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
15 September 2017, 05:04 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,724
|
I'd get rid of the tachy bezel
|
15 September 2017, 07:19 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: JKT
Posts: 102
|
Daytona to me is the perfect watch at any price point. I wouldn't change a thing. Although I do prefer it without the ceramic bezel. It will be a very sad day for me if they increase the size of it. A very sad day.
|
15 September 2017, 07:33 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
|
|
15 September 2017, 08:18 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
|
15 September 2017, 08:32 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
Agree with adding an AR coating (for all Rolex), less text, and especially increase overall legibility of hands and subdials.
Some Daytona subdial hands are so invisible it's like the designers at Rolex completely ignored the notion of contrast or that someone might actually want to use the chrono feature it's built around. Perhaps they're running a psychological test to see if people will still buy a watch you can't read, seeing how far they can take it? I sold my 116520 because I got tired of having to look for the time (somewhere underneath the glare) instead of being able to tell what time it was at a glance. Ended up with a 116509 with silver racing dial/red subdial hands for that very reason; a Daytona I can actually tell time with at a glance. Yay, too bad had to go gold to get it (but even then no AR) Never had that problem with any Speedy Pro. |
15 September 2017, 09:17 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Tony
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: RG Skydweller
Posts: 1,469
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk |
|
15 September 2017, 09:24 AM | #25 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: East Hampton NY
Watch: me break clays..
Posts: 7,495
|
Agreed!
__________________
Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko "The only difference between crazy and eccentric is the size of ones bank account" Anonymous * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
15 September 2017, 09:30 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Peter
Location: Australia.
Watch: ?????
Posts: 1,015
|
Quote:
I got rid of mine for just that reason too.... I've moved on and I'm happy....
__________________
EXP II - DSSD (blue) - PAM 643 - PAM 724 - PAM 424 - PAM 1499 - GRUPPO GAMA - PAM 1305 - Breguet XXI - 116500LN & BLNR....gone |
|
15 September 2017, 09:46 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
If they did the 4 ticks instead of 5 imagine all the posts people would make here showing how their second hand doesn't always perfectly line up with the 1/4 second markers.
__________________
member#3242 |
15 September 2017, 10:10 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
Quote:
|
|
15 September 2017, 10:31 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
Wait, people buy Daytonas to actually tell the time?
/s |
15 September 2017, 12:38 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Noel McKevitt
Location: Dublin Ireland
Posts: 817
|
I have the Daytona 116503 White Dial with Gold Sub Dials & I love it. I very rarely wear my Sub 116613LB at all since I bought the Daytona. I agree with you it is a bit small by today's trends for big Watches but the only thing I would get rid of my Daytona for is for a full Gold Daytona which I hope to have next year. Sorry no pics I don't know how to upload them yet
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.