ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 November 2019, 10:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,567
|
Does UV damage chromalight?
Hello all. I've tried to look on the forum for any discussion about whether UV rays from a flashlight will damage the chromalight, but haven't found anything, hence why I'm asking here.
So... does excessive UV charging (i.e., charging the chromalight via a UV flashlight for 30 seconds periodically) damage the chromalight material? Thanks in advance. p.s., no, I'm not paranoid- I just don't want to get in a bad habit.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
17 November 2019, 10:31 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,496
|
UV damages pretty much everything to some extent, so I guess yes. I doubt it should have any noticeable impact though. Also, why 30 seconds, the UV flashlight should be able to charge it in 1-2 seconds.
|
17 November 2019, 11:05 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
That's been my experience as well. I have a 395nm UV flashlight. Just a couple seconds exposure has my Sub's lume glowing as brightly as it can possibly get; duration of glow doesn't increase with longer exposure, either. 30 seconds is unnecessary.
On a related note, the lume charges just as quickly and effectively using 415nm visible spectrum blue light (as found in an LED face lamp), so technically UV isn't even necessary. Moreover, I'm not convinced that the charging that happens with a UV light isn't from the visible emission from the bulbs, rather than the UV itself, but that's just speculation on my part. Regardless, easily portable flashlights in the 415nm range are neither easy to come by nor affordable, so they aren't a practical alternative to UV flashlights for the purposes of charging lume. (Geek side note: light in the red spectrum above 530nm has zero charging capability, so we can surmise that lume is sensitive only to certain parts of the visible spectrum, not all of it.) Regarding OP's primary question, I honestly don't know. However, I figure going outside on a sunny day is going to expose the watch to just as much if not more UV than a couple seconds under a barely sub-visible flashlight, so I'm not too concerned about it. |
17 November 2019, 11:07 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
But damaged lume might sell for a premium as “patina”
|
17 November 2019, 11:41 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 506
|
What about the uv from that big bright thing in the sky?.
|
17 November 2019, 01:49 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 537
|
From what I’ve read, over time the more a watch’s lume is subjected to UV exposure, the less the lume charges. But we are taking over many years, and I don’t know if it’s as relevant with Chromalite as with some of the older materials. I doubt the occasional charge from a flashlight is doing any sort of damage.
I guess hypothetically in 20 years it may not charge as long as today, but again that’s only been what I’ve anecdotally read not actually experienced. |
17 November 2019, 01:57 PM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 42,991
|
Exactly..
A flashlight isn't going to do anything unless you hit your watch with it.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
17 November 2019, 06:38 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,567
|
Hey, that's a good point. The sun isn't something I can control, unfortunately- and as is, I live in Chicago, where sunlight in the winters is rare to come by.
I've charged the chromalight by holding the UV light directly above the watch, so with very close proximity. I wonder if that has damaged anything, but I'm not particularly worried at the moment. Yes, 1-2 seconds with a UV does light up the chromalight. However, that "charge" barely lasts an hour; when I use the UV light for 30-60 seconds, the charge lasts substantially longer (or, at least it seems that way). Going forward I'll probably just stick to conventional lights.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
17 November 2019, 07:00 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,116
|
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
17 November 2019, 08:21 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,505
|
|
18 November 2019, 04:20 AM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Quote:
|
|
18 November 2019, 04:24 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,567
|
Quote:
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
|
18 November 2019, 04:31 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
It's trite and snarky, but seeing as how JC just came into a thread about Chromalight and disparaged the whole of Rolex lume by citing the performance of a 30-40+ year-old, tritium model, I thought it was apt.
|
18 November 2019, 04:41 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,249
|
From my POV there is literally no reason that Rolex can't use tritium and replace exhausted dials. I love the tritium glow on my Ball. The dial is replaceable. I realize that the tritium pipes aren't beautiful and are only made my a single company but with all the resources Rolex has they should be able to overcome that issue.
|
21 November 2019, 05:16 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,567
|
Update: called the Rolex Service Center in Dallas and spoke to a very helpful customer service rep who told me that (1) the dials are actually UV-protected (and said this extends to the hour markers) and (2) the crystal's anti-reflecting property should prevent most UV-rays from even making it through.
The vintage Rolexes are a different story. So for now, nothing to worry about here, folks.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
21 November 2019, 05:20 PM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,692
|
Quote:
__________________
E |
|
21 November 2019, 05:25 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,567
|
Quote:
What charges the lume (theoretically, anyway) is the UV light's wave, as opposed to the actual gamma rays emanating from the UV light. Same applies to sunlight.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
|
21 November 2019, 06:26 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,692
|
I know how it works.
I design RO water production, UV water sterilisers, UV ink curing systems, ozone generators etc.
__________________
E |
22 November 2019, 02:34 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
|
At least there is some science in this is it safe thread.
|
Tags |
chromalight |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.