ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 April 2021, 10:16 PM | #211 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,523
|
Any news about the six-month-old 9010 'Evolution' non-hacking(!) movement no one knows details about?
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
8 April 2021, 01:38 AM | #212 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 652
|
Again? Obviously there are some people who know the details but until Panerai makes a public statement it's "confidential", you can accept it or not buddy...
__________________
|
8 April 2021, 04:34 AM | #213 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
|
Changing the 9010 seems really weird.
When I got a 682, I only wanted the original version with a display back. I thought it was really weird that they only had the 682 display back version for 1 year, then solid back for another year, then switched to a different movement for the 973. That's a really quick transition for essentially the same watch (42mm Submersible, all steel). And that new movement seems to be called both the P.900 on the website for the 973, but OP XXXIV for the 974? 973 "Automatic mechanical, P.900 calibre, 12 ½ lignes, 4.2 mm thick, 23 jewels, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, one barrel. 171 components" 974 "Automatic mechanical, OP XXXIV calibre, 12 ½ lignes, 4.2 mm thick, 23 jewels, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, one barrel. 171 components" For comparison, for the 1305 "Automatic mechanical, P.9010 calibre, executed entirely by Panerai, 13¾ lignes, 6.0 mm thick, 31 jewels, Glucydur® balance, 28,800 alternations/hour. Incabloc® anti-shock device. Power reserve 3 days, two barrels. 200 components." What is the OP XXXIV/P.900? An ETA movement? With the prices Panerai is charging (MSRP for 973 is the same as for the 682 when I purchased that), going to the 900/XXXIV is disappointing. |
8 April 2021, 04:36 AM | #214 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
|
Quote:
Regardless of ETA vs VF, should have kept the P.9010 in all the Subs if the prices are going to be close. |
|
8 April 2021, 04:52 AM | #215 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,523
|
Love the 9010, and the 9011 rocks in my 01033 GMT. Zero reset seconds is epic!
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
8 April 2021, 05:00 AM | #216 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA
Posts: 468
|
Have hacking 9010 in my newly purchased PAM1056
|
8 April 2021, 06:57 AM | #217 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
|
|
9 April 2021, 04:03 AM | #218 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: CA
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
__________________
Both past and present … Santos de Cartier • Hublot BB • Panerai Luminor • Patek Calatrava • AP Royal Oak • Omega • Hermès • Breitling • Rolex • IWC Schaffhausen • TAG Heuer • Doxa |
|
9 April 2021, 08:42 AM | #219 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,523
|
Quote:
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
|
30 December 2021, 06:09 AM | #220 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 730
|
Bringing this thread back up, has anyone opened a new 1312 with the solid case back to compare movements from the last gen P9010?
I would like to add a 1312 possibly next year but after some digging, I'm getting mixed feelings about this company, the way they label their movements as in-house which in reality are basically ETAs or how they quietly change them with no warnings etc. Thanks |
30 December 2021, 07:54 AM | #221 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
I have the 1118 and have NOT opened it. What I can report is that it's deadly accurate, last month running +1/day. Yes, the non hacking was only a minor annoyance at first, but then I figured out the back pressure "work around." I will say that all this stuff bothered me a bit at first, but I got over it quickly since I believe all of these companies run a little loose when it comes to history, movements, etc.; however, Panerai is just so unique and robust and their case materials so cool, that I simply enjoy wearing them more than my other brands. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
PANERAI Luminor 8 Days GMT “Dot” Dial (PAM00233) PANERAI Submersible (PAM01055) PANERAI Radiomir (PAM01385) ROLEX Sea-Dweller Mk1 (126600) ROLEX DeepSea D-Blue (136660) OMEGA Speedmaster “Silver Snoopy Award” (310.32.42.50.02.001) OMEGA Seamaster Diver 300M 75th Anniversary (210.30.42.20.03.003) IWC Chronograph Top Gun Edition “Woodland” (IW389106) |
|
30 December 2021, 01:22 PM | #222 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
This is exactly what happened with their chrono, they said it was their in house movement, then later they said it was ETA based. I have a problem with a company if they're not going to be up front with their products. If that's the case then I'll look elsewhere or just try to find one prior to June 2020, but would like to buy new from an AD |
|
30 December 2021, 11:13 PM | #223 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
Being the original poster on this thread, I can say that I fully agree with this Post. I was super annoyed that the second didn’t hack, but over time started to forget about that and enjoy the watch for its actual beauty. The moment itself is a gem, robust and accurate as hell. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
30 December 2021, 11:14 PM | #224 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
No, it’s truly in-house. I don’t think they’d do anything that disingenuous to swap it out for an ETA and not tell anyone. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
2 January 2022, 03:27 AM | #225 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 44
|
I am looking at purchasing this Monday a 1305 Luminor Sub Titanium or the 1389 Laminar Sub Titanium with Ceramic Bezel.
According to Panerai's website they both use the P9010. What happened to the second hand when you pull the crown out to set the time? Does it just stop were you pull the crown out like every one of my other watches or does it got to 12 o'clock like my PAM 1321 Laminar GMT Power Reserve I bought in 2018. |
2 January 2022, 06:29 AM | #226 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
If it’s a hacking version of the 9010, the seconds hand stops wherever it is when you pull out the crown. It’s not a zero reset complication. all_in_the_pamily on IG |
|
2 January 2022, 10:27 AM | #227 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
I still wonder why Panerai would get rid of a basic function like this...odd. |
|
2 January 2022, 10:54 AM | #228 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 371
|
1305 is great - love mine. If you feel the need to set it precisely you can use a bit of back pressure on the crown to hold the seconds hand for syncing.
As for the deletion of the feature, I’d guess it has everything to do with Panerai’s 8 year warranty. A hacking function isn’t exactly subtle and must promote wear and tear. It’s a bit like jamming a rod in a moving bicycle wheel. all_in_the_pamily on IG |
5 January 2022, 09:24 AM | #229 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Richmond, KY
Watch: SS Sub, PAM 111
Posts: 67
|
If movement has been updated, or in this case downgraded by a loss function, or simply changed in anyway - functional or structural, the manufacturer surely ought not be using the same caliber number to designate it anymore. If its a closely derived movement - it ought be renamed a P9010.1 or something close to the original, but still different to distinguish it from the unchanged one. Any specific movement's designated number ought to be unique and reflective of its standard features. They just can't call it a P9010 anymore if it doesn't have the hacking feature.
|
6 January 2022, 05:30 AM | #230 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
|
Its the Panerai way.
We suffer it or we choose another brand. |
6 January 2022, 10:12 AM | #231 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Richmond, KY
Watch: SS Sub, PAM 111
Posts: 67
|
How and what they do may not be "right", and its OK to speak up..... but LOL.. it doesn't diminish my affection for my Panerai.....absolutely love my Pam 111.
|
6 February 2022, 02:24 AM | #232 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
|
So does any Panerai now have a display case back with the revised p9010 movement?
|
6 February 2022, 03:27 AM | #233 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 349
|
I don’t believe so. They removed most of them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 February 2022, 04:44 AM | #234 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
|
paneristinewb, its that then makes me think its a downgrade, based on the changes to decoration. Cheapen the movement and hide it by stopping display case backs.
Does anyone have any photos of what the new movement looks like real world? |
8 February 2022, 10:53 AM | #235 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 901
|
Shenanigans like this is why I picked my non hacking eta/Unitas 111. 300m water resistance. Display case back. +6 seconds a day. Less is more.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 Rolex Explorer 224270 Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich Panerai PAM00111 2 Factor Authentication |
8 February 2022, 12:24 PM | #236 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
Very well could be. To be honest, Panerai movements aren’t really known for their good looks. I had a 312 with display case back (P.9000 movement) and really the movement was extremely plain. The rotor took up so much space that there wasn’t any mechanicals to see. The newer version does show a bit more, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t stellar finishing. But man, that thing is reliable and accurate - really what matters in the end. Take Rolex for example, no models with display case back - and even if they did, the movement is very simple looking. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
8 February 2022, 08:21 PM | #237 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
|
Would be really interesting to see pictures of the new gen2 P.9010.
|
21 February 2022, 05:48 AM | #238 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
|
The question is why no pictures?
|
21 February 2022, 08:14 AM | #239 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 371
|
I’d pop the back of my 1305 if it wasn’t under warranty.
all_in_the_pamily on IG |
23 February 2022, 06:03 AM | #240 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
|
Ok, so I just found out this
The old 1312 (with hacking) had a 15.5mm thick case. The newer 1118 and 1662 (no hacking) are both 14.2-14.5mm thick. Could the removal of the hacking mechanism have made the movement thinner hence enabling a thinner case? Or is this difference a result of removing the glass back? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.