The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 25 February 2014, 09:47 PM   #31
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
stilll 5205 for me

i hate how PP just slammed the movement into a bigger case. the date is in the wrong place

as lazy as AP's upsized 15400
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 February 2014, 09:56 PM   #32
El118
"TRF" Member
 
El118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 91
This possibly would be the highest margin model for Patek!
__________________
A Lange & Sohne Langematik Perpetual / Audemars Piguet ROO Rubberclad Black dial / Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15300 / Vacheron Constantin Malte Grand Classiq / Rolex Datejust / JLC Reverso Day n Nite
El118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 February 2014, 10:18 PM   #33
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
It's a very elegant watch. But also a bit too simple for me. I will prefer the 5296 sector dial.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2014, 08:16 AM   #34
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puffy View Post
stilll 5205 for me

i hate how PP just slammed the movement into a bigger case. the date is in the wrong place

as lazy as AP's upsized 15400

Yes
__________________
newb watch collector
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2014, 02:52 PM   #35
mdtddd2007
2024 Pledge Member
 
mdtddd2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,657
I seen it in person...tried it on...very nice but pricey...I 'll add a little more and get an annual calendar.
mdtddd2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2014, 06:43 AM   #36
toomuchtalk
"TRF" Member
 
toomuchtalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,139
5227. Yellow gold. Best watch ever made.
toomuchtalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2014, 06:45 AM   #37
toomuchtalk
"TRF" Member
 
toomuchtalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,139
5227. Best watch ever made.
toomuchtalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 08:30 AM   #38
Jabberjaw
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puffy View Post
stilll 5205 for me

i hate how PP just slammed the movement into a bigger case. the date is in the wrong place

as lazy as AP's upsized 15400
Can someone elaborate on this ? Not sure I understand the comment "date is in the wrong place." As opposed to where exactly ? The date window looks appropriately placed as far as I can tell.
Jabberjaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 12:33 PM   #39
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabberjaw View Post
Can someone elaborate on this ? Not sure I understand the comment "date is in the wrong place." As opposed to where exactly ? The date window looks appropriately placed as far as I can tell.
The date is slightly left of where it was on models where the movement was designed to fit the case. For example, the AP 15400 has the movement designed for the 15300 case, and thus the date window is further left on the dial. ALS for example makes a new movement to fit each case size, which is costly but admirable.
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 01:05 PM   #40
kneedeep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by jok View Post
Very nice watches. Congratulations to those that own one. Just noticed the inside case back on the rose one pictured above doesn't have any engraving inside. Interesting. Wonder how many they made with the engraving?
Think I read somewhere that the first 500 of the 5227 had the Patek engraving. I have seen several this year but none with engraving.
kneedeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2014, 09:04 PM   #41
Jabberjaw
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
The date is slightly left of where it was on models where the movement was designed to fit the case. For example, the AP 15400 has the movement designed for the 15300 case, and thus the date window is further left on the dial. ALS for example makes a new movement to fit each case size, which is costly but admirable.
So the movement was designed to fit a 38mm case but not 39mm 5227 case ?? I have a 5167 which has the same movement in a 40mm case and the date is fine. Still not following the logic here.
Jabberjaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2014, 10:01 PM   #42
rpopescu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabberjaw View Post
So the movement was designed to fit a 38mm case but not 39mm 5227 case ?? I have a 5167 which has the same movement in a 40mm case and the date is fine. Still not following the logic here.
So true, that's half mm every direction.
Proper dial design does not depend entirely on movement size.
5127's hands go until the markers, at 37mm:
http://smg.photobucket.com/user/rjbr...127j2.jpg.html

5227's hands go until the markers, at 39mm:
http://static.squarespace.com/static...ence5227-1.jpg

5296's hands, at 38mm, DO NOT!
http://images.europeanwatch.com/images/13/13329-1.jpg

Of course they all use the same movement.

Q.E.D.
rpopescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 06:10 PM   #43
glimmer
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Here, everywhere
Posts: 1,244
Patek 5227 WG

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
glimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2018, 06:24 PM   #44
pam66
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: cambridge
Posts: 2,256
5227

i bought the R model from a grey dealer for a 10 K discount. actually, it is a very very cool piece in my view, which covers the whole range from very dressy to very sporty. however, as pointed out here repeatedly, it is much too expensive for what it is. no idea how TS justifies the price tag....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2843n.jpg (290.5 KB, 159 views)
pam66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2018, 04:46 AM   #45
Silver Bullet
"TRF" Member
 
Silver Bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5711
Posts: 262
It wears bigger than 39 mm. An interesting thing to do is to handle and try on a 5227 and a 5327 at the same time. The cases are almost identical except for the back, yet the 5327 looks just perfect, and the 5227 looks large with plenty of empty real estate in the lower half of the dial. Personally, I'd go for the 5227 if it was 37 mm, but I think that it just looks a bit vacuous at 39 mm. I love everything else about the 5227 expect the price, but I could even find myself willing to pay the price if only it were just a little bit smaller (which would permit the date window to be on the outside track in lieu of that tiny baton, as is the case in my 5711) or perhaps if it had small seconds or a moon phase in the bottom half of the dial.

Paying a little bit extra to get a calendar is tempting, but the 5205 is more than just a little bit extra. The calendar to consider would be the 5146. If you're considering a 5205, you should also be considering the 5396 and the 5237, which I consider to be better choices, though its a matter of taste.

(Another interesting thing to do is to put the 5227R,J, and G all next to each other. The dial is, in fact, exactly the same colour, but it looks significantly different depending on the colour of the surrounding metal.)
Silver Bullet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2018, 09:11 AM   #46
Silver Bullet
"TRF" Member
 
Silver Bullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5711
Posts: 262
Sorry, typo. 5235g, not 5237
Silver Bullet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 February 2018, 09:38 AM   #47
Mldrake
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kansas
Posts: 102
When shopping a WG dress watch, I tried it. In the end, could not justify dropping double the price of a WG ALS Sax thin.
Mldrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.