ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 September 2017, 01:39 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
16800 Vs. 1680
If you all had to choose between a nice 16800 and the infamous 1680 - with new luminova hands - I posted about in another thread, what would you do?
I know it's all up to me...but I'm just thinking out loud. I do like the matte dial, nice case and great matching hands / lume on a 16800 - but no top hat plexi-crystal. Delta in price is about $2,000 US more for the 1680. Age-wise, we are looking at ~ 1981 (16800) Vs. 1979 (1680) I am also thinking the 16800 - apart from the dial - is pretty similar in appearance to my l6610 - with lugholes - save for the nice matte dial Vs. glossy - and Tritium Vs. Luminova of course. Aaagh! |
25 September 2017, 01:56 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: .
Watch: on my wrist
Posts: 1,938
|
I personally prefer the acrylic crystal on the 1680.
|
25 September 2017, 02:10 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,450
|
I think the 16800 has that blend of both vintage and modern that makes it super practical. The idea of a matte dial and a sapphire crystal is a pretty potent combination. Thats why i am a huge fan of the 16660 even though I don't have one. I also think the 16800 is a bargain when compared to 1680's.
|
25 September 2017, 02:25 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
Quote:
Agreed. A much more sturdy daily watch and undervalued imho. |
|
25 September 2017, 02:34 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
16800 Vs. 1680
Quote:
Yes... Pricing is appealing and you get most of the features of Vintage. Thank you as well. Do you find 1680s to be more fragile or prone to more issues? |
|
25 September 2017, 02:37 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 7,960
|
Always, always, always go with originality with a vintage piece. Replacement hands are the work of the devil.
|
25 September 2017, 02:38 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
16800 Vs. 1680
|
25 September 2017, 02:56 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Jo
Location: Texas
Watch: Sub 1680
Posts: 67
|
1680 for sure. See sig
|
25 September 2017, 02:56 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
It is really just a question of preference. The plastic crystal is very different from the sapphire. As for what is more durable I am still a fan of plastic as they only scratch. The sapphire crystal risk to break and if scratched you need a new one. The plastic one is just to polish.
And lastly the sapphire is another work of the devil. It gets so greasy and disgusting if you are used to plastic crystals. |
25 September 2017, 03:28 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
Quote:
Thank you. I have not had any Sapphire crystals break...and I do like the top hat look. That said, I’ve just been seeing more 1680s with some sort of issue for sale. The occasional “perfect” specimens are usually >$10k Debating whether I’d be “settling” on a 16800 whilst saving $2-3+K My 16610 is such a go-to Watch...and I have all B&P, it would be hard to let go. |
|
25 September 2017, 03:30 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,084
|
I think sapphire and acrylic is a matter of choice. I wore my 16700 for years with no damage.
I have worn my 1675 with acrylic for two years with the same results. I do like matte dials!
__________________
“Anyone can be sarcastic; it takes intelligence to solve a problem!” |
25 September 2017, 03:40 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,117
|
Stick with your 16610 and save yourself some money - if you really must change then pay top dollar for the best 1680 you can find.....or do what I did and buy an old beater 1680 and have it totally refurbished by Rolex......back to as new condition but with service replacement parts ......but then I guess that would be the work of the devil Good luck with your decision.
|
25 September 2017, 03:42 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,105
|
Id personally buy the 4 digit reference but hold out for an original piece.
|
25 September 2017, 03:47 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
If you're going to use it often ... I prefer the 16800
|
25 September 2017, 04:10 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
|
25 September 2017, 04:16 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
Quote:
Yes. Hard to do when you're obsessing. |
|
25 September 2017, 05:35 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: dave
Location: miami
Watch: me ride bikes
Posts: 1,938
|
You’re doomed to buy the 1680. Whether it will be now, or after the 16800. Just skip the formality and go for the one you want now before they get any more expensive! My $0.02
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
25 September 2017, 06:29 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
|
25 September 2017, 06:43 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: dave
Location: miami
Watch: me ride bikes
Posts: 1,938
|
|
25 September 2017, 06:56 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,344
|
|
25 September 2017, 07:29 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle
Watch: 5167a
Posts: 33
|
IMO the 1680 is better looking. After buying my 1680, can’t imagine letting it go. As cool a sub you can buy without seriously breaking the bank on an earlier 4 digit reference. Good luck!
|
25 September 2017, 08:25 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,694
|
|
25 September 2017, 01:05 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 3,838
|
Had both. I would choose the 16800
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
25 September 2017, 09:07 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,002
|
1680 everyday of the week. Matte and Acrylic.
I’m glad someone mentioned the “greasy sapphire”. I hate that look. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
25 September 2017, 10:13 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Rickey Higgins
Location: Huntington, TX
Watch: 1680 Sub in white
Posts: 354
|
1680...but I'm already wearing one daily and loving it.
|
26 September 2017, 02:12 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
buy both!
This way you will have 1680, 16800, and 16610 - all you will need then is a 168000 and you'll have a complete set. :) |
26 September 2017, 02:19 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.