Is the 16600 pre-ceramic Sea Dweller considered a “cult classic” by collectors?

[Miker86]

Originally Posted by ROlesorusLEX

My wrist is 7.1 inches measured above the wrist bone, where I wear my watch and where I am wearing it in the above photo. I hope this helps.

I also wear a BB58 routinely on a leather strap. The BB is slightly smaller in diameter and does show smaller on my wrist. The 16600 is 2.5mm thicker than the BB, so it does stand a bit taller. This is primarily because of the "bubble" caseback.

I do not like watches over 40mm, and I do not like tall watches, but the 16600 is a perfect mix, just tall enough to have great presence, but not a tumor on the wrist.

I'll try to take photos of both this afternoon for you, if you'd like.

Sent from my KB2005 using Tapatalk

That would be very helpful

[ROlesorusLEX]

Originally Posted by Miker86

That would be very helpful

16600 vs BB58 thickness compared, along with wrist shots on 7.1" wrist above ulnar styloid process.

Sent from my KB2005 using Tapatalk

[rmwill]

LOVE my A Serial Swiss Only 16600. Never selling.

[Miker86]

Originally Posted by ROlesorusLEX

16600 vs BB58 thickness compared, along with wrist shots on 7.1" wrist above ulnar styloid process.

Sent from my KB2005 using Tapatalk

Thanks very much! Interesting how much of thickness is made up of the bezel and crystal.

[ROlesorusLEX]

Yeah, I was surprised that the actual case on the BB is thicker, but the bubble back and the bezel on the 16600 is the heft. I had never made this comparison before myself.

Sent from my KB2005 using Tapatalk