ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 January 2016, 05:28 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Manila,Philippine
Posts: 105
|
NO DATE for the symmetrical look.
Date if it is your only watch because date function comes handy when you need it. |
22 January 2016, 06:18 PM | #62 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,792
|
There is no bad decision between those two.
Pick the one you like best. Buy the other for your next.
__________________
E |
22 January 2016, 09:30 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: ken
Location: united kingdom
Watch: 124270
Posts: 806
|
My choice! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 January 2016, 09:42 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: 1991 14060 Sub
Posts: 498
|
I'm a big no date fan. The early '90s 2 line models are so clean. Definitely vote for 14060/114060
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1991 14060 Submariner 1994 Tudor Big Block 1995 Rolex Explorer II 1992 Omega Speedmaster Pro |
22 January 2016, 09:59 PM | #65 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,061
|
I say the SubC... 114060 is a great watch. Great symmetry, overall looks, and if you don't absolutely need the date it's the better choice in my opinion. I do own one so could be biased.
|
22 January 2016, 10:59 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Uk
Posts: 2
|
Either or for me, but I sometimes like the look of the no date.
|
22 January 2016, 11:49 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
|
I got the Date first and then I had to get the ND to be really happy.
|
23 January 2016, 02:08 AM | #68 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,595
|
I love the symmetry of no date but unlike many, I also like the cyclops. I like the functionality of quickly seeing date so I would go with that. It really is not a pain at all, especially if you keep your watch on a winder when you do not wear it for periods at a time. Then it is just a once every 60 day sort of thing.
|
23 January 2016, 03:36 AM | #69 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
For me the no date made sense from a price pov. I bought as my second Rolex a 14060 T<25 which I've since had serviced as well and is currently under warranty. I have plenty of date watches and only a couple no dates. I use it as a rough play water sports watch so it serves its purpose well.
I love the easy versatility of the easy change through hole lugs; here it is seen with a leather Nato strap. |
23 January 2016, 03:42 AM | #70 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Sergio
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: Yes please!
Posts: 1,694
|
Love the look on the ND since it's a nice classic look (especially the 2-liner), but I prefer the date since I always look at my watch for the date multiple times a day when I forget lol
__________________
♛ 126610LV ♛ 16220 Salmon ♛ 16713 Rootbeer Ω Speedmaster Moonwatch The choice that will last a lifetime |
23 January 2016, 04:46 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 4,975
|
I think the ND is a great option for the Sub. It flies under the radar and has great symmetry over the date version.
|
23 January 2016, 05:01 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 243
|
My vote is sea dweller so the date is there but cyclops is missing. It's the best of both worlds :)
|
23 January 2016, 05:07 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
|
I debated the same thing in November. I went ND and love it. So glad I did. It's simple and uncluttered. I searched around and found a great older 2 liner which IMHO just helps keep it looking clean.
|
24 January 2016, 12:27 PM | #74 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
|
24 January 2016, 12:32 PM | #75 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
I really like the Sea Dweller and started to drift toward them, but then the watch budget is keeping me a bit in check. I'm also concerned about wearing it every day and it might be a bit too big. I'm a pretty big guy and could carry it. Okay, okay...maybe if the right deal came along..haha Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 January 2016, 12:40 PM | #76 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
Quote:
It's funny, I'm on the computer all day and use my calendar online all day so I guess I don't really need the date. I have a date function on the Swiss Army Maverick and the Tag Heuer Formula One, but now I'm wondering about it because I rarely look there for the date. I just looked at both watches to see if the dates were even right. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
24 January 2016, 12:47 PM | #77 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
|
24 January 2016, 01:02 PM | #78 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
|
24 January 2016, 01:06 PM | #79 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
Quote:
Thanks! |
24 January 2016, 01:08 PM | #80 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
|
24 January 2016, 01:33 PM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
|
Can't go wrong with either one! Look forward to seeing what you choose.
|
24 January 2016, 03:16 PM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Western KY
Posts: 501
|
I like the ND dial layout better but have a Sub date and have grown to always check the date by looking at my wrist even when wearing watches that are ND.
You can always take the cyclops off if that bothers you too. Looks great without the magnification. Ultimately whatever makes you smile more. Cell phones and all the other digital technology we are surrounded by today makes a date complication redundant and nothing special unless it's an annual or perpetual calendar. But as I said that I was sitting here thinking about which Day Date strap watch color I want the most lol. I'm going to have to get a colorful 36mm DD strap watch at some point. Clean symmetrical dials are adored by many, myself included, but I'm still going to glance at my wrist when wearing a ND just out of years of habit. |
24 January 2016, 05:29 PM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Netherlands
Watch: ♛
Posts: 552
|
I have the date. And i use my watch for the date more then i thought. Think if i would buy a watch without a date i would be disappointed when look at it to know the date and it isn't there.
__________________
♛ 116610LN - 116710BLNR - 116500LN White - 116500LN Black Instagram: @sportwatchmania https://instagram.com/sportwatchmania/ |
24 January 2016, 05:51 PM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
|
The cyclops is signature Rolex
|
24 January 2016, 06:30 PM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16800 Matte
Posts: 398
|
|
24 January 2016, 08:36 PM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Dee
Location: London
Posts: 911
|
There's no right or wrong answer... Pick the one that sings to you!
|
24 January 2016, 08:45 PM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: England
Posts: 23
|
I would get the date model because if you get the no date you may regret not getting the date model later on.Got my first Rolex in August,the date model.Hope this helps.
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk |
24 January 2016, 08:50 PM | #88 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Quote:
The answer is simple. If you prefer the look of the Sub Date - buy it, it is as simple as that. if you prefer the look of the "no date", all you have to do is ask yourself a very simple question. - Is my brain capable of remembering todays date for the rest of the day. If your brain is up to speed and you have the mental ability to remember todays date, then the "no date" model is the obvious choice. If the old brain cells are slowing up - you are better off going for a date model. Regards Mick - old codger of 67 who knows today date and is still capable of remembering it. |
|
24 January 2016, 09:50 PM | #89 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 1,910
|
Quote:
Haha, thanks Mick. All of these comments are helpful. Originally I was set on the No Date and then started to drift toward the date, but after focusing on thinking about it I'm back on the No Date. |
|
24 January 2016, 11:08 PM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: California
Posts: 144
|
The no date Sub is just beautiful.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.