The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 October 2018, 03:10 AM   #1
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
16710 Pepsi vs 116170LN

I am torn between these two watches and haven't had the chance to have them side by side to decide which to purchase.

The Pepsi is a classic, and prices keep going up. I feel like if I don't buy it now, it may soon be too expensive to purchase.

The green GMT hand has always spoken to me on the 116710LN. I also think the bracelet and clasp construction is far superior and more substantial.

Price wise I can get an unworn 116170LN for probably $1500 less than a good condition full set Pepsi.

What do you guys think? My only Rolex at the moment is a 16570 Polar.
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 03:18 AM   #2
sugarl4nd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 67
16710 hands down :)
sugarl4nd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 03:21 AM   #3
SimplyWatches
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Joseph
Location: Maryland
Watch: Rolex Maniac
Posts: 77
I would go with the 16710
SimplyWatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 03:26 AM   #4
meyers
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: ○
Watch: 16710
Posts: 435
As a daily, the 16710 checks all the boxes for me. In fact, as I write this I just landed and set the time using the wonderful jump hour hand function. Using the watch as the tool it was designed to be!

Also, when is the next time Rolex will make a 6-in-1 watch? Dare I say, never
meyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 03:38 AM   #5
squatchy
"TRF" Member
 
squatchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Minnesota
Watch: SS/WG DJ41
Posts: 93
As a BLNR owner I may be biased, but I never cared for the 116710LN. The 16710 has a lot more character and better color scheme. Another tick for the 16710 here.
squatchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 03:50 AM   #6
R!$
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
116170LN is a better value and will compliment your polar better

The 16710 is artificially high with collector demand. Price will correct as demand wanes.
R!$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 04:04 AM   #7
Imran
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Imran
Location: Karachi, Pakistan
Watch: Submariner 124060
Posts: 167
116710LN a robust contemporary Gmt plus the 16750 polar, best of both 6 digit and 5 digit references.
Imran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 04:14 AM   #8
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,262
If I had the choice again I would get the 16710 even though I bought the 116710. I don’t regret having the 116710 but I still want a 16710. Not sure that would be the case if it were the other way around.
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 04:37 AM   #9
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,400
Both are fantastic and I have had both. The 16710 remains however. Incredibly versatile watch. The 116710ln is great but I love the ability to switch the other one about on both bezels and bracelet and for me I prefer the 5 digit aesthetic.

At that much less however, the 6 digit is a real runner...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Stevec14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 04:41 AM   #10
nachopc
2024 Pledge Member
 
nachopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Nash
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Only
Posts: 1,501
16710 !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
nachopc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:14 AM   #11
Jinson
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: Older GMTs & Subs
Posts: 564
16710 Pepsi is a classic!
Jinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:16 AM   #12
envuks
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
envuks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,687
116710ln would be my personal choice.

I could never get over the bracelet and clasp on the 5digit models.
__________________
Current watches: 116718ln, 116500 black dial, 40mm Breitling Chronomat MOP dial

“A man with one watch always knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.”
envuks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:26 AM   #13
marcotagudelo
"TRF" Member
 
marcotagudelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: in my house
Posts: 357
it depends:
the 5 digits are "tool watches"
the 6 digits are "luxury watches"
if you dont care about "the bling" go with the pepsi.
i would go with the pepsi
from what i read you are ready for the pepsi but would like a modern.
its your money and your satisfaction everytime you look at it.
the first choice is normally the one you always go for.
marcotagudelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:27 AM   #14
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by envuks View Post
116710ln would be my personal choice.

I could never get over the bracelet and clasp on the 5 digit models.
As much as I love the pepsi, I'd have to agree. Ever since going to the six digit references I would prefer to avoid the old clasp.
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:30 AM   #15
marcotagudelo
"TRF" Member
 
marcotagudelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: in my house
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dsmith1974 View Post
If I had the choice again I would get the 16710 even though I bought the 116710. I don’t regret having the 116710 but I still want a 16710. Not sure that would be the case if it were the other way around.
i had both pepsi's 16710 and 126710.. 126710 is still in the collection and
now i realized that i should have kept the 16710 as the 126710 is more "dressy" more blingy, dont get me wrong i enjoy it but the 5 digit would go more "under the radar" compared to the new one if that makes sense.
marcotagudelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 09:45 AM   #16
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
I don't particularly care for the blingy style of the ceramic bezels and the PCLs will likely bother me, but I can get a new 116710LN from an AD with minimal wait time and the experience would be cool.

The Pepsi has been a watch I have always remembered since I was a kid as being associated with something cool and it was the first watch I ever attached to the Rolex brand when I was young.

This is a hard decision than I thought it would be.
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 09:47 AM   #17
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by R!$ View Post
116170LN is a better value and will compliment your polar better

The 16710 is artificially high with collector demand. Price will correct as demand wanes.
Do you think a large 16710 correction will happen? Logic says yes, but I know better than to think everything is logical. It's such an iconic watch, the new 126710 doesn't really satisfy the same crowd of people, in my opinion, and the fact that its obviously no longer produced tell me it could continue upward.

I am also a little sad I didn't buy one a few years ago for thousands less LOL
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 10:17 AM   #18
ras47
"TRF" Member
 
ras47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,063
How big are your wrists? The 16710 is not a big watch, even at 40mm. My wrists are 7 3/4" and sometimes I feel like it's just a hair too small for me.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710
Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono
ras47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 10:22 AM   #19
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by ras47 View Post
How big are your wrists? The 16710 is not a big watch, even at 40mm. My wrists are 7 3/4" and sometimes I feel like it's just a hair too small for me.
Small. My EXP II 16570 fits me very well.
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 10:22 AM   #20
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,758
A trashed 90s example I'd take the ceramic all day. A late serial, no holes 16710 in mint condition wastes ANY modern GMT (and Sub) as far as I'm concerned and will only become more difficult and costly to procure.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 10:26 AM   #21
azs.77
"TRF" Member
 
azs.77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA/Canada
Watch: Rolex, AP, Panerai
Posts: 812
Modern sports watches are pretty hard to beat in my opinion. 116710ln would be my choice (ideally, BLNR).
azs.77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 11:35 AM   #22
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas0617 View Post
I am torn between these two watches and haven't had the chance to have them side by side to decide which to purchase.

The Pepsi is a classic, and prices keep going up. I feel like if I don't buy it now, it may soon be too expensive to purchase.

The green GMT hand has always spoken to me on the 116710LN. I also think the bracelet and clasp construction is far superior and more substantial.

Price wise I can get an unworn 116170LN for probably $1500 less than a good condition full set Pepsi.

What do you guys think? My only Rolex at the moment is a 16570 Polar.
Get what suits you not what someone else determines. You are going to wear it right - not someone here posting their opinion.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 11:50 AM   #23
Recaro18
2024 Pledge Member
 
Recaro18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: RiCkY
Location: WESTSIDE
Watch: 16520
Posts: 11,038
16710!
__________________
Passion for Mechanical Timepieces!
IG: @crown_in_oyster_case

~Connecting people through my passion, one timepiece at a time~
Recaro18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 12:26 PM   #24
Oyster Al
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Posts: 1,531
Pepsi no contest
Oyster Al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 02:48 PM   #25
GsurgBM
"TRF" Member
 
GsurgBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,758
Had both. Sold the LN and bought a BLNR. WOULD NEVER sale the Pepsi.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai
GsurgBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 03:54 PM   #26
dubins930
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
dubins930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 796
16710 all day
dubins930 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 07:19 PM   #27
Carrera_2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: London, UK
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 114
Pepsi is the way to go.
Carrera_2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:30 PM   #28
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,421
16710 but I’m biased w the 5 digit models & more so w the Coke look over the Pepsi. Especially if you have thinner wrists then 5 digit is way to go. I have 6.7-6.8 wrists & the 5 digits wear better than my previous 6 digit SubC.
__________________
126710BLRO-0001 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Silver Snoopy / PAM24 / PAM111
Onequik135i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 08:32 PM   #29
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,499
Case shape, lug with and bezel material vastly different. You have to see which one fits your wrist and eyes better.

red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 09:02 PM   #30
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,731
I would go with the six digit modern Rolex. For me it wears better and has a lot of upgrades. The five digit watches have sored in price and when the bubble breaks they will fall in price way below current market. I prefer the BLNR and own a WG BLRO.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20181004_112942 (002).jpg (204.2 KB, 930 views)
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.