The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 October 2018, 09:34 PM   #31
Eric-London
"TRF" Member
 
Eric-London's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: London
Posts: 1,060
16710 for me.

Eric-London is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 09:39 PM   #32
Rode
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 242
I will go with 16710 Pepsi, the 116710LN is too plain and simple. But if you want a ceramic bezel get the 116710BLNR
Rode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 11:11 PM   #33
WBradbury
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Walter
Location: UK
Posts: 13
White gold has that mesmerising hue and shine which is enticing, then you feel the weight of it on your wrist and it's hard to forget!
WBradbury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 11:19 PM   #34
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
In terms of wearability, the LN wins it for me. But then again, I never cared for the fit/feel of the 5 digit bracelet. And that clasp...I just can't do it.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2018, 11:31 PM   #35
casadecamporolex
"TRF" Member
 
casadecamporolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Louie
Location: CDC DR/Ithaca
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 1,241
Each of these magnificent watches are very worthy. However, they are very dissimilar in their construction and technical characteristics.
My current daily wearer is the BLNR. Out of all my watches, this fits and feels this best. It is modern, marvelously manufactured in every detail and hard to surpass.
My 16710 Pepsi is like a classic MB 450 SL. Well engineered for its time, iconic in appearance and perpetually fit for enduring wear. It’s simplicity is its strength.
Holding the two side by side points out the differences quite simply.
The question is which appeals to you the most?
Nothing wears as comfortably as the newer models. Nothing looks better than my crisp Pepsi. Not a fan of new BLRO.
casadecamporolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 07:20 AM   #36
lucassith
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 134
I would go with 116710, because you already have a 5 digit Rolex, so I think that maybe it’s time for a Ceramic version


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lucassith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 07:27 AM   #37
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by recaro18 View Post
16710!
Definitely!
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 08:14 AM   #38
GMT Aviator
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
GMT Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,276
I have both the ceramic LN as well as a number of 16710’s including coke, Pepsi and LN.

The LN in 5 or 6 digit makes for proably the most versatile bezel combo of any GMT bar none. 5 digits have a heritage that 6 digits don’t yet possess, but the 6 digit is really a superior watch in many ways. 6 digits take a daily beating and barely show any signs of ware.

I like them both equally, but for different reasons. Since getting my 6 digit, my 5 digits don’t get daily ware anymore.
GMT Aviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 08:17 AM   #39
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,652
The LN is my favorite 6 digit GMT but in this case I'd get the 16710.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 12:15 PM   #40
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
Leaning towards getting the 5 digit Pepsi, selling my polar, and buying a 114060. I think a ND Sub C and a 16710 would be a great combo.
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 12:49 PM   #41
HNIC
"TRF" Member
 
HNIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex collector
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas0617 View Post
Leaning towards getting the 5 digit Pepsi, selling my polar, and buying a 114060. I think a ND Sub C and a 16710 would be a great combo.


I would keep the polar. It’s nice to have some contrast with a white dial in the collection. Black dials are all over the Rolex lineup and in this case the 16710 and 114060 are both black dials. I agree, they are a great combo but the polar in there would make an even better trio. ⌚️




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HNIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 12:58 PM   #42
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,160
I was looking at some 16710s and decided it has to be unpolished, now I'm at 11k with B&P and thinking about the bracelet and clasp, l just can't get on board. I'm going for a new Blnr or Ln

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 01:15 PM   #43
Donaldkrama
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Usa
Posts: 103
The Pepsi is my choice without a doubt, IMO any GMT Pepsi is highly desirable, it will really go with the Polar you already have.
Donaldkrama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 01:56 PM   #44
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNIC View Post
I would keep the polar. It’s nice to have some contrast with a white dial in the collection. Black dials are all over the Rolex lineup and in this case the 16710 and 114060 are both black dials. I agree, they are a great combo but the polar in there would make an even better trio. ⌚️




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3 isn't quite in the cards right now, but who knows. Maybe its worthwhile to keep the Polar and add the Sub when the time comes.
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 01:58 PM   #45
bas0617
"TRF" Member
 
bas0617's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Brad
Location: California
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikrnic View Post
I was looking at some 16710s and decided it has to be unpolished, now I'm at 11k with B&P and thinking about the bracelet and clasp, l just can't get on board. I'm going for a new Blnr or Ln

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I'll get a lot of heat for this, but I'm not a BLNR fan. Yes, 16710 prices are high, but I don't see how a "bubble" would pop. Rolex is only getting hotter and this model is so sought after that it seems it will only go up. Probably going to try to find a decent B&P example hopefully around 10k
__________________
16610LV, 16710 BLRO, 126600 SD43, 116610, 14060,
bas0617 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 02:02 PM   #46
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
The 16710.
sensui is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2018, 02:11 PM   #47
XZACM102
"TRF" Member
 
XZACM102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: CA
Posts: 378
I don't think it's even close. 16710 Pepsi is just in it's own league and gets all my wrist time.
Get it now, there will be many opportunities to get 116170LN later.

XZACM102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 12:07 AM   #48
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas0617 View Post
I'll get a lot of heat for this, but I'm not a BLNR fan. Yes, 16710 prices are high, but I don't see how a "bubble" would pop. Rolex is only getting hotter and this model is so sought after that it seems it will only go up. Probably going to try to find a decent B&P example hopefully around 10k
No heat from me, you like one or you don't. I think I'm trying to like the Blnr, not 100% til I try it on. Did you look at Nashville Watch? Chase has three 16710s listed. Good luck, no doubt they are beauties and I'm sure will always be sought after.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 12:11 AM   #49
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas0617 View Post
I'll get a lot of heat for this, but I'm not a BLNR fan. Yes, 16710 prices are high, but I don't see how a "bubble" would pop. Rolex is only getting hotter and this model is so sought after that it seems it will only go up. Probably going to try to find a decent B&P example hopefully around 10k
Everybody has been waiting for the bubble to pop for a while now. I'm not holding my breath. You could look at 16700s too, they're usually trading at slightly lower prices.

If you have a pretty small wrist the 6 digits don't really wear well. Even though the numbers say they're the same size they wear significantly different.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 02:34 AM   #50
Robbyman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
Pepsi
Robbyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 03:46 AM   #51
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 8,972
16710 for me
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 04:06 AM   #52
pigman08
"TRF" Member
 
pigman08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Watch: 16610,16710,214270
Posts: 427
Pepsi


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
♛- 16610 (1999)
♛- 16710 (2018)
♛- 214270 (2018)
♛- Yet to be determined, but a white 16520 is on the short list. (I believe that I'll be able to read it better than my old 116520)
pigman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 04:08 AM   #53
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Faced this same question some 10 years ago, at that time I could have pickup a brand new Pepsi from the AD but chose the GMT-LN instead because the LN is much better made than the old Pepsi and I don't like the smaller double-lock crown of the 5-digit Pepsi. I still like the pepsi but will get the new 6-digit SS BLRO instead.

I think you can't lose with either, enjoy!
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 04:27 AM   #54
Rockrolex
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Rockrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,507
I've got a 15 yr old 16710LN that's never been serviced and keeps great time. It's my travel watch (whether in the same or across time zones). I love it and would never flip it. You have to go with your gut. Try them both and whichever sings to you is the one to get.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular.

Tosser Cabinet Member

Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Rockrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2018, 06:40 AM   #55
meyers
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: ○
Watch: 16710
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigman08 View Post
Pepsi


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SEL, lug holes, serif insert..

DAAAANG!!
meyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2018, 12:22 PM   #56
Xander002
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3
I would buy a ceramic version...
Xander002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2018, 12:46 PM   #57
AdamG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: HNL, LDN, SHA
Watch: 5 digit ref
Posts: 397
16700/16710
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2018, 01:19 PM   #58
subprimero
"TRF" Member
 
subprimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,431
A 16710 would be perfect with a polar 16570!
subprimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2018, 01:25 PM   #59
ace12
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 130
I would go with the 16710 all day long.
ace12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2018, 01:51 PM   #60
Danj338
"TRF" Member
 
Danj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Midwest
Posts: 184
16710
Danj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.