|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 December 2010, 01:30 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: new york
Posts: 260
|
SMP vs. Non Ceramic Sub
Went out for dinner with some friends last night and one of them was wearing a SS sub circa 1995, I was wearing my coaxial SMP Bond. We switched watches for a few minutes and he admitted that my SMP felt much more substantial then his sub. He was very impressed with the dial, bracelet and caseback of my SMP.
I know it is not fair to compare a new SMP with an older sub but with a new sub costing twice as much as a SMP, the Bond is a bargain! 
|
|
|
|
29 December 2010, 01:34 AM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
Search the forums here or google the comparison;its been done ad nauseum....
 Also take a look in the watch reviews forum here in TRF: http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=105437 |
|
|
|
|
29 December 2010, 01:42 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
|
yes, the Rolex sub is boring , thats what makes it different , Omega PO at $4K MSRP offers more and cost less , yet because of Rolex AD and Rolex marketing the buyers are willing to pay for it.
Its all about resale value ..... 
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
