ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Andrés G · 14 April 2013, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubKing

The new AP 44mm contain Entirely Inhouse movements, you must be referring to the older 42mm models.

That is not true. The new 44mm models (caliber 3126) use AP 's 3120 as a base caliber but still have a Dubois-Depraz chronograph module attached.

SubKing · 14 April 2013, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrés G

That is not true. The new 44mm models (caliber 3126) use AP 's 3120 as a base caliber but still have a Dubois-Depraz chronograph module attached.

I cannot say I agree with you. The AP website doesn't even show a picture of the correct movement that's inside the 44mm..

I would need a couple others to back you up on that info before I would agree.

It is my understanding that the use of Dubois-Depraz modules have been suspended and not used on the new 44mm line up's.

TSW · 14 April 2013, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubKing

I cannot say I agree with you. The AP website doesn't even show a picture of the correct movement that's inside the 44mm..

I would need a couple others to back you up on that info before I would agree.

It is my understanding that the use of Dubois-Depraz modules have been suspended and not used on the new 44mm line up's.

Andrés is correct on this one..However AP is in the finishing phase of a complete in-house chrono movement.

SubKing · 15 April 2013, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Andrés is correct on this one..However AP is in the finishing phase of a complete in-house chrono movement.

good to know Thomas. Thanks for the info

Andrés G · 15 April 2013, 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSW

Andrés is correct on this one..However AP is in the finishing phase of a complete in-house chrono movement.

Only on this one?...

I really hope they launch the new chrono movement soon.

Andrés G · 15 April 2013, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubKing

It is my understanding that the use of Dubois-Depraz modules have been suspended and not used on the new 44mm line up's.

The chronograph module is still created for AP by Dubois-Depraz. AP finishes and modifies it, to their own specifications, to make the 3840 module.

Your watch is powered by the 3126/3840 movement.

iLLGT2 · 15 April 2013, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samkumar

The PP is no doubt a grail watch but I just don't see paying 51K for a SS watch even though its a PP. IMHO keep the AP RG & save up for the PP if you MUST have it. My .02 cents.

AGREED

Maybe i'm in the minority, but, I don't ever see why a Patek stainless steel CHRONO is considered a grail?!?! Nothing grail like about it, and in fact, the finishings were subpar to many others i've seen in a similar price range.

i think it's crazily overpriced,

Keep the rose gold ROO!

HL65 · 15 April 2013, 09:08 AM

5980 for me and if possible the R! Cheers,

Evil bendy · 15 April 2013, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

5980 for me and if possible the R! Cheers,

PP 5980R is a STUNNING watch - and probably my favorite from the nautilus/aquanauts ..

TSW · 15 April 2013, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrés G

The chronograph module is still created for AP by Dubois-Depraz. AP finishes and modifies it, to their own specifications, to make the 3840 module.

Your watch is powered by the 3126/3840 movement.

Yup

Submarino · 15 April 2013, 09:34 PM

While I love the Patek, the AP is just fantastic.

SubKing · 15 April 2013, 11:58 PM

I just cannot get over how bad the AP is getting its butt kicked in the poll and in an AP section no less!. PP really stole the show huh.

AshAP · 16 April 2013, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubKing

I just cannot get over how bad the AP is getting its butt kicked in the poll and in an AP section no less!. PP really stole the show huh.

It's very strange! But I don't really think the poll is accurate as most of the respondents who said they would buy Patek in answer to your question actually went with AP when it was their own money at stake.

shnxx · 16 April 2013, 07:46 AM

Well just because they voted in the ap forum,it doesn't mean they bought AP

mineral · 20 April 2013, 03:45 AM

5980 in heart beat.

Rolex Freak · 20 April 2013, 06:08 AM

I'd do it.

herbie911 · 21 April 2013, 06:54 AM

Both watches look fantastic. Personally, I will try my best keeping the AP and save up for the Patek. You lose thousands selling a really nice watch and then have to fork another $$$$ to get the Nautilus. They look like a perfect pairing!

michaelryuen · 25 April 2013, 06:31 PM

Let's do the opposite , will you trade in your Patek for an AP ?

jontay02 · 25 April 2013, 09:25 PM

imo, keep the RG and save on for the PP.

I also agree that its not an upgrade from RG -> SS despite the brand PP.

kilyung · 25 April 2013, 11:29 PM

I'm curious how many that responded have owned either (in any model)?

DreambreaX · 26 April 2013, 12:34 AM

In my opinion, not try to offense anybody here,

changing AP RG to Patek is NOT A GOOD IDEA.

you have real gold case on AP, why you should change into stainless steel with the name PATEK?

gold trade to stainless steel is like trade 100$ to 10$.

perhaps, not this extreme because they are also selling the brand PATEK and their classic model.

even with the name patek on great quality movement, no mater what you argue its still stainless steel.

gold has better charisma than steel.

Keep the AP.

john11f · 30 April 2013, 02:25 AM

Patek Philippe > Audemars Piguet

AK797 · 30 April 2013, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john11f

Patek Philippe > Audemars Piguet

Only for the coffin dodgers.

fminus · 2 May 2013, 03:55 PM

5980R a choice?! personally I like the 44 better, but in 10 years who knows what the "latest" ROO will be like but you know the nautilus will be still be the nautilus....

shnxx · 2 May 2013, 04:18 PM

I say it's better to just buy a solid block of gold.
Better if it is polished gold.

Wear it around ur neck proudly and maybe decorate it with some cubic zirconias.

wetfeet · 2 May 2013, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubKing

After checking around and being my watch is only 3 months new and in mint condition, I'm asking respectably 35k for it. So I'm looking at around 10k more out of pocket which you are absolutely spot on.

If I love something, then the 10k outta pocket wouldn't bother me as much. I just want to make sure at that rate it wouldn't be a bad move selling my AP for this particular patek.

Keep in mind I bought my AP at the old price of 61,200 but I did get a discount on that price.

Where were you 3 weeks ago! Argh. I'd have bought yours.

Given the difficulty of finding one at all, I think you might be able to get more than that. A lot of people advertising this watch do not have it in stock, some want your money and they'll find it for you, some will take your money and give you the next one in (2 months? 4 months? They don't know the answer.)

One that's 3 months old in mint condition with box and papers I think will stand up well just for the next me that comes along. I seriously would have bought yours.

A couple of used older style ones I was looking at also sold over a period of days.

Lastly some places are asking well over MSRP for these still in some locations.

wetfeet · 2 May 2013, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shnxx

I say it's better to just buy a solid block of gold.
Better if it is polished gold.

Wear it around ur neck proudly and maybe decorate it with some cubic zirconias.

Why go CZ when you can carve in little five line stars with a pen knife.

diver2012 · 2 May 2013, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

Only for the coffin dodgers.

+1.

SubKing · 2 May 2013, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubKing

Thanks for everyone's help. Nice to see all the poll results and how first pp was winning then ap etc.

From everyone's advise, I have decided to keep the AP and save a PP for later in time.
I do feel I would at this point in my life grow tired of the PP fast.

The AP is equal in quality and superior in metal and in this case RG vs SS.
at the end of the day, it's just the name that sells you because these are two amazing watch brands. Hard to pick between the two

Thanks everyone for all the excellent advise

I think it's time to close the thread. I made up my mind weeks ago.. back when AP was in the lead

my how things have changed..

PP is timeless and more collectable, but that shouldn't be a reason to buy it. The AP sings to me way more than the PP.

still going to keep the AP and save up a bit for the patek to own in the future. I would like to own both.

at the end of the day I really do love the AP.

Just mixed feelings since the AP price decrease, I was alittle turned off, but I want to give it time and see where AP is taking this "new" approach.

the watch itself is amazing. so I just have to keep that in mind.

If I ever do decide to sell it, I will list it here on TRF. thanks all

dsk28 · 2 May 2013, 11:19 PM

Sub, sorry to comment on your otherwise closed thread but I just had to post this pic of my dad trying on the Novelty FC against the Patek Philippe 5980.

Whatever it is you're one lucky guy to be choosing between two wonderful timepieces.

ps. I must say, this pic does the RG no justice as it will look much sweeter than the FC!

View Poll Results: Should I trade My 44mm RG AP in for a Patek nautilus chrono?
Yes, Trade in the AP and put up more cash for the Patek.	119	54.34%
No, Keep the AP, it looks way more killer than the Patek.	100	45.66%
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll

15 April 2013, 09:08 AM	#98
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,456	5980 for me and if possible the R! Cheers, __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

15 April 2013, 09:34 PM	#101
Submarino "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mr. H Location: Dallas Watch: them for me! Posts: 7,180	While I love the Patek, the AP is just fantastic. __________________ WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

16 April 2013, 07:46 AM	#104
shnxx "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,120	Well just because they voted in the ap forum,it doesn't mean they bought AP __________________ newb watch collector

20 April 2013, 03:45 AM	#105
mineral "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 3,670	5980 in heart beat. __________________ Watching date changes every midnight

15 April 2013, 11:58 PM	#102
SubKing "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: USA Watch: where do i start?? Posts: 3,254	I just cannot get over how bad the AP is getting its butt kicked in the poll and in an AP section no less!. PP really stole the show huh.

20 April 2013, 06:08 AM	#106
Rolex Freak "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Sandro Location: Canada Watch: Rolex/GS Posts: 4,412	I'd do it.

21 April 2013, 06:54 AM	#107
herbie911 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: united kingdom Posts: 445	Both watches look fantastic. Personally, I will try my best keeping the AP and save up for the Patek. You lose thousands selling a really nice watch and then have to fork another $$$$ to get the Nautilus. They look like a perfect pairing!

25 April 2013, 06:31 PM	#108
michaelryuen "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Singapore Posts: 154	Let's do the opposite , will you trade in your Patek for an AP ?

25 April 2013, 09:25 PM	#109
jontay02 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: australia Watch: AP! Posts: 192	imo, keep the RG and save on for the PP. I also agree that its not an upgrade from RG -> SS despite the brand PP. __________________

25 April 2013, 11:29 PM	#110
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,873	I'm curious how many that responded have owned either (in any model)?

26 April 2013, 12:34 AM	#111
DreambreaX Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Rolex Estate Posts: 1,304	In my opinion, not try to offense anybody here, changing AP RG to Patek is NOT A GOOD IDEA. you have real gold case on AP, why you should change into stainless steel with the name PATEK? gold trade to stainless steel is like trade 100$ to 10$. perhaps, not this extreme because they are also selling the brand PATEK and their classic model. even with the name patek on great quality movement, no mater what you argue its still stainless steel. gold has better charisma than steel. Keep the AP.

30 April 2013, 02:25 AM	#112
john11f "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Manila Posts: 222	as a rule Patek Philippe > Audemars Piguet Last edited by john11f; 30 April 2013 at 02:27 AM.. Reason: change to complete name

2 May 2013, 03:55 PM	#114
fminus 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: chino hills Posts: 155	5980R a choice?! personally I like the 44 better, but in 10 years who knows what the "latest" ROO will be like but you know the nautilus will be still be the nautilus....

2 May 2013, 04:18 PM	#115
shnxx "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,120	I say it's better to just buy a solid block of gold. Better if it is polished gold. Wear it around ur neck proudly and maybe decorate it with some cubic zirconias. __________________ newb watch collector

2 May 2013, 11:19 PM	#120
dsk28 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Asia Watch: SS Posts: 450	Sub, sorry to comment on your otherwise closed thread but I just had to post this pic of my dad trying on the Novelty FC against the Patek Philippe 5980. Whatever it is you're one lucky guy to be choosing between two wonderful timepieces. ps. I must say, this pic does the RG no justice as it will look much sweeter than the FC!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)