ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: 5167 Vs 5164 choose time | |||
5167 | 131 | 42.12% | |
5164 | 180 | 57.88% | |
Voters: 311. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
21 January 2018, 04:21 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
5167 Vs 5164
Hello
Im planning to jump in the Patek’s world. First I wanted the 67, its simole and beautiful. But now I have doubts 64 is gorgeous and love its complications. HELP
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
21 January 2018, 04:32 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,651
|
I think the 5164 is the perfect travel watch.
|
21 January 2018, 04:43 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,176
|
If you’re willing to spend more, I’d go 5164. And eventually add a 5711 (/1a or /1r) and you are set.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
21 January 2018, 05:10 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
5164. Its a great travel watch and a great everyday watch as i wear mine way more often with the 2nd time zone hidden. IMO the dial is more interesting with the date dial vs the 67.
|
21 January 2018, 05:29 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: CT
Posts: 45
|
5164, nice complication and more interesting.
|
21 January 2018, 05:32 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Felix
Location: GMT +1
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 2,975
|
5167 for me, still love mine after several years of ownership.
|
21 January 2018, 05:38 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,857
|
5164 all day. Love the dual time zone complication!
|
21 January 2018, 05:40 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US East Coast
Watch: Dealer
Posts: 13,512
|
I was just farting around in my photo studio when I saw this thread.
my choice... I'd consider thickness. I used to own the 5167 but it was far to thin for me - not what I envision for a "sports watch". The 5164 is a good bit thicker and has more of a sporty masculine feel - while the 5167a was thinner than some of my dress watches. |
21 January 2018, 06:00 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
|
Debating wether to upgrade my 5167 to a 5164 this year or grab a ceramic Daytona. First world problems lol
|
21 January 2018, 06:37 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,859
|
You really can’t lose. If funds permit I would get the 5164
__________________
|
21 January 2018, 06:47 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
5167 ....clean and simple.
|
21 January 2018, 07:17 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,355
|
5164 easier to acquire I would think.
|
21 January 2018, 07:29 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Im taking the gmt.... wonderful
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
21 January 2018, 07:52 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Watch: TT SUB LV GMTII
Posts: 527
|
I have a 5167r but I voted 5164 because i think in steel at least its a nicer watch.
but my 67r came to me used and at a good price. tbh I love them both for different reasons. |
21 January 2018, 08:35 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
|
5164
|
21 January 2018, 09:01 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,629
|
5164 if you can pony up the premium. It's a lot of money for a complication you might not use. Even then, it has a more interesting dial, more symmetrical case and better proportions IMO.
|
22 January 2018, 08:11 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,339
|
Agree with this. Even if you will never use the second time zone function I think the 5164 is more interesting visually and horologically.
|
21 January 2018, 09:18 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Seattle
Posts: 787
|
A few years ago, the same poll had nearly a tie. I love when this happens with a sizable number of votes. It shows that these watches are great and very coveted.
https://www.rolexforums.com/poll.php...ts&pollid=2921 I like both references almost equally, maybe with a very slim preference for the 5164. |
21 January 2018, 09:45 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,355
|
I'm on the fence between this, 5712 and 116500. Flipped the 5711, too boring.
|
21 January 2018, 04:54 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Quote:
I also have both 116500 and beleive me daytona C is a tremendous watch ! 5164 + 116500 will suit perfectly well
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
|
21 January 2018, 09:45 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nash
Posts: 148
|
5164 is the best but 5167 is the only one that’ll be in my budget
|
21 January 2018, 09:49 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 8,972
|
Had both, kept the 5164. I love the complication
|
21 January 2018, 10:30 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
I’d get either on in RG instead of SS. I voted for the 5164 because it’s more useful for traveling.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 |
21 January 2018, 10:35 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
|
Both are great. I’d rather take the 5167 and add a Reverso or GMT.
|
21 January 2018, 11:47 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,225
|
Love the 5164, it is a big premium over the 67 but very worth it.
|
21 January 2018, 04:14 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Clinton
Location: Canada
Watch: PP, Omega
Posts: 159
|
I didn’t even think about the 5167A, went straight to the 5164A. I had to decide between 5712/1a and 5164A at the time though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 January 2018, 10:37 PM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,041
|
Old answer 67, but 64 has taken over the forum so I’ll jump aboard too
|
22 January 2018, 06:29 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Getting closer
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
22 January 2018, 10:05 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,260
|
Had a 67, flipped it as it was too boring for me
|
22 January 2018, 10:52 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,041
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.