The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 August 2013, 12:09 PM   #1
OhioWatch
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
First Rolex - Would you suggest this one?

Looking to buy my first Rolex and came across a Blue Dial Oyster Perpetual Date like the one in the link below. While it is priced below this one, I hesitate to appear as I'm not doing my own research and ask what experts feel this is worth.

More important to me is would this make a good watch for everyday wear and if I were want to trade for a different one in the future, is it a decent model value / desirability wise?

Thanks for any and all comments and input.




http://www.chrono24.com/en/rolex/oys...d&watchTypes=U
OhioWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 01:20 AM   #2
OhioWatch
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
15210

I should have included the model number. It is 15210. Thanks for any and all comments and suggestions.
OhioWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 01:42 AM   #3
versatile1
"TRF" Member
 
versatile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
It's a 34mm
I bought my wife the same watch.
I tried It on but way to tiny for my wrist. I'm 5'11" 170 lbs
Watch looked to small, mind you I have been wearing 40mm watches for 10 years so.......
versatile1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 01:55 AM   #4
motoikkyu
"TRF" Member
 
motoikkyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,731
Agreed. Nice entry-level Rolex, but the 34 mm case looks small on some men. Be sure to try one on before choosing the Date over the Date-Just (36 mm).
motoikkyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 01:57 AM   #5
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,779
Nice watch. Realistic resale value probably closer to 2k, but I like 34mm watches and I'm a pretty big guy. Good luck on your hunt!
powerfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 02:01 AM   #6
OhioWatch
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
Thanks for the input. This is probably a rookie question, but here goes. When measuring the watch, where do you start and stop measuring? Thanks
OhioWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 02:08 AM   #7
joe100
2024 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,752
34mm is fine. I wear a 34mm AirKing most of the time myself. The rest of the time a 40mm, very heavy Omega Speedmaster Date GMT. The 34mm cases are very comfortable.

The watch you're looking at was made in the 90s and early half of the 2000s. Fine watch.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 02:09 AM   #8
joe100
2024 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by motoikkyu View Post
Agreed. Nice entry-level Rolex, but the 34 mm case looks small on some men. Be sure to try one on before choosing the Date over the Date-Just (36 mm).
Yeah, the whole "entry-level" phrase doesn't get much traction here. A Rolex is a Rolex, no such thing as entry-level.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 02:12 AM   #9
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,444
I wouldn't consider it as entry-level as the quality is just as good as a 30k DayDate, it is an understated watch and it is a very nice choice as a first Rolex.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 02:34 AM   #10
datejusting
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,153
It is a nice watch but you might consider the 36mm datejust as it has a better resale value.
datejusting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 02:37 AM   #11
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
You should see and try watches in person. the pictures don't show the relative size of the watch vs your wrist.

bottom line, buy what your love.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 03:44 AM   #12
OhioWatch
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
I appreciate the input and have tried it on once, but will take a second look and see if they have a 36mm or larger to compare against. The price is $2750 with tax, so if this seems fair, I'd be interested your take.

Thanks again for helping a rookie make an informed decision.
OhioWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 10:17 PM   #13
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,688
datejust

Quote:
Originally Posted by datejusting View Post
It is a nice watch but you might consider the 36mm datejust as it has a better resale value.
For the price, you can probably find a stainless DJ. One of the nice things about the DJ line is all the options. There are way more Datejusts out there in the pre-owned market, too.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:05 PM   #14
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: Dad's 14060
Posts: 1,936
Go with a DJ. I had my Oyster Perpetual 1002 in 34mm on a few weeks ago, and my wife, who never comments on my watches told me that it looks too small on me. I am 6'1" and I have put the 1002 away to give one of my kids for graduation someday.
__________________

1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:18 PM   #15
jshepard
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
Go to an AD and try one on with the same dimensions then post it. We'll have a better idea how it looks on you. The dial is a pretty standard stick dial, it's up to you if you like it. I have a 34 mm vintage omega,I like how it looks on me and its my most comfortable watch. You can barely feel its there.
jshepard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:21 PM   #16
LuminousMaximus
"TRF" Member
 
LuminousMaximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Watch: me hit Huge Lotto
Posts: 6,502
This is a nice watch to start out with...I know a few guys who would love to have it...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg old.jpg (148.6 KB, 562 views)
__________________
“Every man Dies...
Not Every Man, Really Lives.” – William Wallace -


To really lives means to live your life to the fullest. It means to chase your dreams, take risks, and to love life.
Since everyone’s fate is the same, why not live the best life that you possibly can? In order to really live,you must seize the day.
Live each day as if it's your last and overall just do it! Today is a gift, that’s why it’s called the present...
LuminousMaximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:35 PM   #17
Rolex king 68
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex king 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NewJersey/NewYork
Watch: Patek 5074P
Posts: 207
IMHO I would go with 16200 Datejust.
Rolex king 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:50 PM   #18
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,175
My first Rolex was a Date (34mm). It was a beautiful watch but I later regretted not getting the larger 36mm Datejust. When I finally did flip it for the DJ I was much happier with the appearance and feel. Absolutely......try on a 36mm too before you decide.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:51 PM   #19
TonyD
2024 Pledge Member
 
TonyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Boston North
Watch: Meteorite Daytona
Posts: 1,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioWatch View Post
Thanks for the input. This is probably a rookie question, but here goes. When measuring the watch, where do you start and stop measuring? Thanks
The "diameter" of a watch is typically measured across the watch diagonally, doesn't really matter where. You just need to avoid the crown, or pusher buttons and things like that as they are NOT included in the size. Hope that makes sense.

Maybe this will help: http://www.zappos.com/measurement-guide#watches
__________________
Pepsi GMT/SD43/DSSD Blue/ DJ41 TT Rose Diamond Dial/ Daytona Meteorite/ SS Sky Dweller White Dial/ IWC Bronze Big Pilot/ Aquanautic Super King / Omega Ploprof 1200 / Graham Scarab Diver
TonyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2013, 11:51 PM   #20
Stuxnet
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 570
Go to a shop. Try on a 34mm, a 36mm and a 40mm. Find what looks and feels best. Then look for the watch you like most in that size.

As stated above, no such thing as "entry level". Don't let price play a disproportionate role in your decision.
Stuxnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 12:24 AM   #21
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,848
First thing I'd do is list the watches that i like and their prices (by descending order). As you go down the list you'll get to a point you're comfortable - watch v price - or you'll realize you need to save more. Never "settle" or you'll be unsatisfied and flip your watch.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 12:42 AM   #22
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,632
i would not suggest that one.

i realize that some people prefer the smaller sizes. but this is super small. go and try on more watches, even from other brands.

make comparisons. rolex excels at the sports watches. IMHO, if you are going with something dressier and smaller, see what other options you have. tons a great brands making smaller watches.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 12:53 AM   #23
OhioWatch
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
Thanks again to everyone for their thoughtful suggestions. I will spend some more time trying on the larger diameter ones. However just from the comments, im leaning away from the 34mm. There is a AD not too far from me.

Interestingly enough, this jeweler also had a previously owned Omega Seamaster Chronometer in all stainless which really caught my eye. Price point wise, it's less than half the Rolex, but the bracelet was smooth as silk and it seemed like a very nice timepiece. This appears to be an addictive hobby!
OhioWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 03:26 AM   #24
TempoKing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
I like it ...but not for $3200.
TempoKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 05:38 AM   #25
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioWatch View Post
Thanks again to everyone for their thoughtful suggestions. I will spend some more time trying on the larger diameter ones. However just from the comments, im leaning away from the 34mm. There is a AD not too far from me.

Interestingly enough, this jeweler also had a previously owned Omega Seamaster Chronometer in all stainless which really caught my eye. Price point wise, it's less than half the Rolex, but the bracelet was smooth as silk and it seemed like a very nice timepiece. This appears to be an addictive hobby!
that omega is a total winner. they have a great product.

also check the 39mm explorer 1. IMHO, the best overall, daily, chameleon watch. it goes with every occasion and looks amazing. if too big, they have a 36mm version.

also simply stunning.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 07:43 AM   #26
Doug T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Anola, Manitoba
Watch: GMT Master 11
Posts: 431
Once you try a few different sizes, my guess is that you'll lean towards at least a 36m. Don't rule out a 40 if you like the sports models. See how they look on your wrist and how they feel. You won't go wrong with any of the Rolex line. Good luck.
Doug T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 07:46 AM   #27
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: SoCal
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Get at least a 36 mm to start

A nice 1601 or 1603 can be found cheaper than this one

Just my .02

HAGOne

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Of course I do! You're Iconic!
Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 03:32 PM   #28
A.Sharp
"TRF" Member
 
A.Sharp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousMaximus View Post
This is a nice watch to start out with...I know a few guys who would love to have it...
This indeed is a better watch to start with but it's not in the 3k range
__________________
A.Sharp

"I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland."
A.Sharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 11:51 PM   #29
OhioWatch
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
For what it's worth, they also have a oyster date but with the plain looking dial. Appears to be the same size as the oyster perpetual date. However, it didn't appeal as much to me for some reason.
OhioWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2013, 11:53 PM   #30
rolio
"TRF" Member
 
rolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: justRay
Location: Back2California
Watch: Birdies
Posts: 1,921
Yes. Yes. And yes.
__________________
JJ
"Tranquil? Just wait till I get started!! LOL! LOL!" --JJ

Rolex~By way of an extraordinary life,
and all the simple pleasures it has to offer
~
rolio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.