The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 27 November 2019, 09:45 AM   #31
srvrf
2024 Pledge Member
 
srvrf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commonproject View Post
Feel like this is a Daytona killer. At maybe $5-6K more in grey market I would much rather have this


I’ve owned two ROCs and two Daytonas. The Daytona is definitely more of a tool watch especially with a ceramic bezel. And it is 100m WR. It’s iconic. But for me, I prefer the look of the ROC and the functionality of the date. It is way more legible and the bracelet is awesome. If it were 100m WR with a ceramics bezel I think it would be ideal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
srvrf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2019, 10:22 AM   #32
Flybak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 1,606
The 38mm has the ideal proportions in the Royal Oak Chronograph line-up. The off-center date is the one minor grievance but not a deal-breaker. OP, that's an excellent piece
Flybak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2019, 02:34 PM   #33
Commonproject
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYG1121 View Post
Does the chrono feel more "substantial" on the wrist? In terms of heft and due to the thicker profile?
curious on this as well. It's thicker compared to 15450 but still thinner than the Rolex SS watches, so wondering if this is more comfortable
Commonproject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2019, 09:31 PM   #34
EdwardC
2024 Pledge Member
 
EdwardC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Pacific
Posts: 3,476
The 38mm chronograph actually has a thicker and a bit wider bracelet. More solid feeling than the 15450 but by no means the 15450 is flimsy. I went with the 15450 as I hate the 38mm chronograph date window and I really want to see the movement. And saving 6k
EdwardC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2019, 10:54 PM   #35
Adirondoc
"TRF" Member
 
Adirondoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Glenn
Location: Long Island, NY
Watch: AP Royal Oak 16315
Posts: 184
My Daytona wears smaller than the 38mm ROC. That is to say, I notice it less on the wrist. The Daytona simply feels smoother, catches the sleeve less, and is the watch I forget I'm wearing. It's oyster bracelet is hard to find fault with, comfort wise. My 15450 also quite comfortable, bracelet-wise. The 38mm ROC's bracelet, perhaps being so new, has edges I'm always aware of. As it moves ever so slightly about the wrist, the links' edges are noticeable. I've heard others say otherwise, but that's been my take. It's the price I pay for having a watch with bold geometric designs and sharper, well defined edges that give it it's signature industrial look.
__________________
Time doesn't pass. Alas, we pass and time stays.

Rolex TT Daytona Arabic Panda / Rolex GMT II Pepsi / Rolex Explorer II Polar / '53 18K Datejust / Rolex 41 SS Datejust / PP Calatrava Date / IWC Flieger Chrono / AP Royal Oak 15450 / AP Royal Oak Panda Chrono 26315 / OP Radiomir 210 / OP Luminor 1392
Adirondoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2019, 11:23 PM   #36
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
You should send that sharp-edged AP in for a polish. It will return with nicely rounded edges.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adirondoc View Post
My Daytona wears smaller than the 38mm ROC. That is to say, I notice it less on the wrist. The Daytona simply feels smoother, catches the sleeve less, and is the watch I forget I'm wearing. It's oyster bracelet is hard to find fault with, comfort wise. My 15450 also quite comfortable, bracelet-wise. The 38mm ROC's bracelet, perhaps being so new, has edges I'm always aware of. As it moves ever so slightly about the wrist, the links' edges are noticeable. I've heard others say otherwise, but that's been my take. It's the price I pay for having a watch with bold geometric designs and sharper, well defined edges that give it it's signature industrial look.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2019, 12:17 AM   #37
NYG1121
"TRF" Member
 
NYG1121's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NE
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adirondoc View Post
My Daytona wears smaller than the 38mm ROC. That is to say, I notice it less on the wrist. The Daytona simply feels smoother, catches the sleeve less, and is the watch I forget I'm wearing. It's oyster bracelet is hard to find fault with, comfort wise. My 15450 also quite comfortable, bracelet-wise. The 38mm ROC's bracelet, perhaps being so new, has edges I'm always aware of. As it moves ever so slightly about the wrist, the links' edges are noticeable. I've heard others say otherwise, but that's been my take. It's the price I pay for having a watch with bold geometric designs and sharper, well defined edges that give it it's signature industrial look.
Thank you. But does it have more of a wrist presence/heft compared to your 15450? Despite similar in size, I would imagine the thickness would lead to a different experience but I have not had the opportunity to compare
NYG1121 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2019, 04:15 AM   #38
Adirondoc
"TRF" Member
 
Adirondoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Glenn
Location: Long Island, NY
Watch: AP Royal Oak 16315
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYG1121 View Post
Thank you. But does it have more of a wrist presence/heft compared to your 15450? Despite similar in size, I would imagine the thickness would lead to a different experience but I have not had the opportunity to compare

Ah sorry, I missed the mark. Yes, the ROC carries more wrist presence owing to its dial, and however small the difference, its slightly wider case. As you mention, the increased thickness adds to the wrist presence as well, with the dial set slightly deeper.
__________________
Time doesn't pass. Alas, we pass and time stays.

Rolex TT Daytona Arabic Panda / Rolex GMT II Pepsi / Rolex Explorer II Polar / '53 18K Datejust / Rolex 41 SS Datejust / PP Calatrava Date / IWC Flieger Chrono / AP Royal Oak 15450 / AP Royal Oak Panda Chrono 26315 / OP Radiomir 210 / OP Luminor 1392
Adirondoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2019, 04:22 AM   #39
NYG1121
"TRF" Member
 
NYG1121's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NE
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adirondoc View Post
Ah sorry, I missed the mark. Yes, the ROC carries more wrist presence owing to its dial, and however small the difference, its slightly wider case. As you mention, the increased thickness adds to the wrist presence as well, with the dial set slightly deeper.
Awesome thanks for all your helpful input. Appreciated by all!
NYG1121 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 08:09 PM   #40
kenta986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Norway
Watch: AP RO 26315
Posts: 3
I see this is an old thread, but just wanted to add that the bracelet size of the two is identical. Both is 23 mm at the case and 16 mm at the clasp. Both have a wrist span of 49 mm.

Compare it to the 15202 and the 15300 which has a bracelet size of 26 mm at the case and 16 mm at the clasp, with a wrist span of 52,3 mm.

The 15400 has a bracelet of 26 mm at the case, similar to the 15202, however the size at the clasp is 18 mm. The wrist span of the 15400 is also larger than the 15202, measuring at 55 mm.

My experience is that for the Royal Oaks, it is important to look at the overall size and appearance of the watch, inkl. the bracelet.

Beautiful watches though! I own a 26315 in silver, and are waiting for my 15450 in blue.
kenta986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 09:48 PM   #41
Benzsiam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Benzsiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,905
Both look very good, they are just about the same size (only 1 mm diff.).

The panda looks beautiful but 15450 looks more elegant and dressier to me.
Benzsiam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 09:52 PM   #42
Benzsiam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Benzsiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 5,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adirondoc View Post
Quite stunning!
Wow, with yellow gold bracelet, make it looks gorgeous and perfect size.
Benzsiam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2020, 10:17 PM   #43
sgwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
sgwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: KP Jimmy
Location: Singapore
Watch: R/AP/FPJ/Hermès/et
Posts: 6,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenta986 View Post
I see this is an old thread, but just wanted to add that the bracelet size of the two is identical. Both is 23 mm at the case and 16 mm at the clasp. Both have a wrist span of 49 mm.

Compare it to the 15202 and the 15300 which has a bracelet size of 26 mm at the case and 16 mm at the clasp, with a wrist span of 52,3 mm.

The 15400 has a bracelet of 26 mm at the case, similar to the 15202, however the size at the clasp is 18 mm. The wrist span of the 15400 is also larger than the 15202, measuring at 55 mm.

My experience is that for the Royal Oaks, it is important to look at the overall size and appearance of the watch, inkl. the bracelet.

Beautiful watches though! I own a 26315 in silver, and are waiting for my 15450 in blue.

__________________
sgwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2020, 12:50 PM   #44
60sec
"TRF" Member
 
60sec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: US
Watch: 116500, AP RO
Posts: 227
Beautiful!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
60sec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 11:19 AM   #45
Sir Thalas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenta986 View Post
I see this is an old thread, but just wanted to add that the bracelet size of the two is identical. Both is 23 mm at the case and 16 mm at the clasp. Both have a wrist span of 49 mm.

Compare it to the 15202 and the 15300 which has a bracelet size of 26 mm at the case and 16 mm at the clasp, with a wrist span of 52,3 mm.

The 15400 has a bracelet of 26 mm at the case, similar to the 15202, however the size at the clasp is 18 mm. The wrist span of the 15400 is also larger than the 15202, measuring at 55 mm.

My experience is that for the Royal Oaks, it is important to look at the overall size and appearance of the watch, inkl. the bracelet.

Beautiful watches though! I own a 26315 in silver, and are waiting for my 15450 in blue.
Thank you for this! I finally found what I was looking for. Did you recieve your 15450 yet?
Sir Thalas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2021, 02:39 AM   #46
tuan2195
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 22
I wonder if AP will release a 38mm time-only RO anytime soon as an update to the aging 15450 - I've recently accquired a 15300 and I think the 39mm size is great but 38mm might be a tad better. 37mm is a bit small for me.
tuan2195 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2021, 03:28 AM   #47
Swaye
"TRF" Member
 
Swaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: USA
Watch: What I am wearing.
Posts: 1,879
Loving the 26315
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4468.jpg (104.3 KB, 175 views)
File Type: jpg 46ACC6FC-8D01-4519-ACF7-C8303E8AFFE7.jpg (86.6 KB, 175 views)
__________________
RolexH. Moser F.P. JourneAudemars PiquetPatek Philippe
_______________________________
"I'm not playing hard to get, I'm playing hard to want."
Swaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2021, 03:46 AM   #48
NYG1121
"TRF" Member
 
NYG1121's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NE
Posts: 2,749
The 38mm ROC is just about perfection!
NYG1121 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2021, 03:52 AM   #49
illiguy
2024 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by srvrf View Post
With a smaller wrist, you can also consider the older 39mm ROCs. I personally love the size and balance. The date window is also centered if that bothers you on the 38mm models.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
+1 for the 39mm ROC. Same size as the Jumbo, but with Chrono complication? Yes, please. Think these are a good value proposition relative to other APs at the moment.

For the record, I love the 38 mm ROC, the 37 mm, 39mm, 41 mm ROs .... you get the point.
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.