ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 December 2012, 11:50 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 781
|
Omega Speedmaster "moonwach"
I have been thinking of buying the 3570.50.00 or 3573.50.00 but then I noticed it said they where NOT self winding. Is it possible to get a version of these watches that are self winding?
__________________
...And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years... |
16 December 2012, 12:10 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
There are automatic Speedmasters but they are not "moon watches". All "moon watches" are manual hand wind.
|
16 December 2012, 02:04 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 781
|
Quote:
I can see why Omega want to keep the 3570 true to the original. But the 3573 comes with both sapphire crystal and sapphire case back, so it is already a modern version, why not just make it self winding as well? Anyone else that also want the "moonwatch" but keep from buying because it is not self winding? I hope they one day announce a self winding version. I think it would be a success.
__________________
...And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years... |
|
16 December 2012, 02:28 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
Early on, I wondered why the fascination with a hand wound watch, with no date, and with a "plastic" crystal. At the urging of others, I purchased a pre-owned Speedy Pro and after a week or so, I was hooked. Over the years, I have owned a couple of dozen Speedmaster Professionals in various forms. My current Speedy Pro is a 47-year old 105.012 as worn by Armstrong and other moon walkers. At my death, it will go to my grandson who even today understands the significance of his granddad's watch. No other watch has its history and mystery. Taking a moment to wind my Speedy Pro is a time for me to reflect upon the achievement and courage of the Apollo astronauts. |
|
16 December 2012, 03:07 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 19
|
Go for the moonwatch....u will not regret it...but if u really have the budget then go for the speed master co-axial ....but this fellow wears big and is auto.
|
16 December 2012, 03:20 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
|
Check out the 311.30.44.32.01.001. I think it's a very unique piece (although still manual wound).
Happy hunting! |
16 December 2012, 03:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
|
Check out the 311.30.44.32.01.001. I think it's a very unique piece (although still manual wound).
Happy hunting! |
16 December 2012, 03:28 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,149
|
There are auto variants, but they are in a bigger case size (44.25mm as opposed to the 42mm of the regular Moonwatch). You can get one with the cal. 3313 or the cal. 9300 - the 9300 would be my choice, but it's pretty much double the price of the standard Moonwatch
|
16 December 2012, 04:23 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 781
|
I got very small wrists and usually use 36mm watches and up to 40mm watches. I think larger watches then that most often do not look good on me. So the 42mm is a stretch for me, because I really like the look of the "moonwatch". But 44mm is a little over the top for my wrists in my opinion.
Also manual wound is not an option for me. I have tried it before and I just keep forgetting to wind it. I am considering the 3220.50.00 Day-date instead of the "moonwatch". I have also looked at the ladie's collection. Those speedmasters got the perfect size for me, but I do not like the look of the ladies speedmasters too much, and I am not sure how I feel about buying a ladie's watch Thanks for the responses anyway.
__________________
...And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years... |
16 December 2012, 06:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 842
|
Moonwatch
You won't forget to wind up a 'MoonWatch'.....it will be the first thing you will look at in the morning.......
Go for it... |
16 December 2012, 09:19 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,149
|
Quote:
|
|
16 December 2012, 09:30 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
I don't understand the appeal of an automatic winding Speedmaster - what's so hard about hand winding a watch? It also gives you a much more tactile pleasure winding it. It's like stick shift and what could be more fun than that?
|
16 December 2012, 09:30 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: George
Location: New York
Watch: Speedmaster, Rolex
Posts: 3,082
|
Ever try checking out the 3510 or 3539?
|
16 December 2012, 10:57 AM | #14 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,927
|
Quote:
Why not look at the: Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chronograph Automatic 44mm Sapphire Sandwich.
__________________
E |
|
16 December 2012, 10:59 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Forget to wind it! My God man, you'll be looking at it every 10 minutes.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
19 December 2012, 01:06 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex 116610 LV
Posts: 27
|
Go with the new speedy 9300...
The best that money can get :D Skickat från min GT-I9300 via Tapatalk 2 |
19 December 2012, 11:03 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
19 December 2012, 01:22 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 119
|
I actually prefer the manual wind. It's nice being able to keep a watch going by winding it 10 seconds every morning than having to worry about automatic watches and putting them in a winder...
|
19 December 2012, 03:07 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: Houston
Watch: Rolex, Omega, IWC
Posts: 321
|
I'm with ya..it's not the popular vote....but as much as I love speedies I keep flipping them because I hate winding that small crown. I had an auto too and I flipped it. I guess I just prefer the larger crowns.
|
20 December 2012, 01:35 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Chip
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 6,194
|
No and No.
__________________
Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87 |
20 December 2012, 01:37 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,609
|
Get an automatic speedmaster reduced. Those are in a 38mm case.
|
20 December 2012, 01:38 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: George
Location: New York
Watch: Speedmaster, Rolex
Posts: 3,082
|
the handwinding isn't so bad...if you just wind it for like 15-20 when you first put it on that's it. I also love the 3572.50 or sapphire variant with the 1863 movement and since it is manual wind you don't have a rotor blocking the view.
|
21 December 2012, 01:30 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
|
If you had to have auto then go for it but in my opinion you would lose the history along with it, there's a reason for the manual wind and plastic crystal. It adds to the conversation factor to the watch...
I had the same thought before I bought my moon watch, "I might forget to wind" or "I'll get tired of winding every other day" but I don't forget and it feels like "I make this watch run" it's like feeding your dog LOL you become attached to it. I've enjoyed the winding process so much that I'm thinking of going manual if I ever buy that darn jlc reverso I can't seem to stop Googling. |
22 December 2012, 04:44 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
Go with the handwound! It is nice to interact with the watch on an almost daily basis.
__________________
Russ |
29 December 2012, 08:04 AM | #25 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 32,361
|
What is a good price for a 2012 3570.50.00 complete with boxes and papers Speedy in good condition.
|
31 December 2012, 10:14 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 5
|
I was offered $3600 tax in for the 2012 moonwatch. I bought mine two years ago for $3100 tax in.
|
1 January 2013, 09:08 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: Brisbane Aus.
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,443
|
X2 with my 68 pre moon
I had the same concerns when I got my first Speedie, no date and manual wind, my god, how can we live like this....but it was very easy, not once have I forgotten to wind it, it's a class act that takes some beating
Quote:
__________________
www.journeyjottings.com |
|
1 January 2013, 02:15 PM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Quote:
|
|
2 January 2013, 12:04 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 9
|
If you want to compare :
Speedmaster Pro 3570.50 (42mm, manual, hesalite, no date, 50m water resistant) Speedmaster Pro 3573.50 (42mm, manual, saphir/saphir, no date, 50m water resistant) Speedmaster Co-Axial 3133 (44mm, Automatic, date, 100m water resistant) Speedmaster Coax 9300 (44mm, Automatic, date, 100m water resistant) |
3 January 2013, 12:50 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 42
|
How many hours will each manual wind last? How can you tell if you need to wind it again before it stops completely? Will the daily winding cause additional wear and tear on the crown tube, crown stem and movement?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.