The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 February 2019, 08:20 AM   #1
blown5.0
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 416
How Do Rolexes Stack Up Against the Competition

In the different manifestations of its offerings? For example-

-Diving use- How does the Sub line stack up against those from Omega or the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms?

-Aviation- Rolex GMT vs the Breitling Navitimer

-Use in heavy magnetic scenarios- Rolex Milgauss vs Omega Aqua Terra

I love the history of mechanical watches in general, and it would be interesting to see how Rolexes fare across a multitude of different scenarios. I am not just talking about the aesthetics, but the actual functionality of the watches.
blown5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:33 AM   #2
Junior_
"TRF" Member
 
Junior_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 658
Sub beats the Omega Seamaster every day of the week (though the Seamaster is a great watch). Only place the Seamaster 300 comes close to the Sub is antimagnetic.
Junior_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:37 AM   #3
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,736
Rolex, Rolex and Rolex. Then again, all I know and wear is Rolex
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:41 AM   #4
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,095
In real world terms of use, I’d say they are pretty much equal.

I prefer the Rolex brand and it’s aesthetics.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:43 AM   #5
Kyle3130
"TRF" Member
 
Kyle3130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Oklahoma
Watch: FXD
Posts: 1,940
Rolex would probably take the top spot in every category of mechanical watchmaking except finishing.
__________________
Kyle3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:48 AM   #6
SoTaxLaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Scott
Location: USA
Watch: 114060
Posts: 337
Regarding function in “heavy magnetic scenarios” some of the Omega watches offer 15,000 gauss so that is a material advantage for Omega under the conditions the OP describes. I bought a blue Railmaster that offers this feature along with 150M water depth rating. However, the watch wasn’t as comfortable as my Rolex watches so I quickly came to realize that there are other factors that are just as important when selecting a timepiece. Edit: okay I knew that beforehand but I pretended this was a way to save money when looking at the Z Blue Milgauss.
SoTaxLaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:52 AM   #7
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,649
I think good and I prefer Rolex.
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:54 AM   #8
georgekart
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,491
It's really hard to judge. What's the best?

For example diving: if best is one with highest depth rating, then Deepsea Challenge takes it. However if we only take commercially available timepieces, Hublot has a watch that can go 4000m (100 more than DSSD) and was tested down to 5000m. Although it looks atrocious.

Aviation is difficult, because many watches tracking multiple time zones exist, but arguably GMT is most useful implementations, however Omega and TAG do have a GMT with chronograph functions so arguably those are more usable.

Magnetic scenarios - Here I would actually argue Omega takes the cake. Rolex has very magnetic resistant movement, cased in magnetic resistant case, whereas Omega takes a new approach. All their new movements are absolutely magnetic proof (at least to my understanding) and while Milgauss was tested to 10000 Gauss and did not suffer consequences at some strength of field it would. Omega wouldn't. Although I suppose if fields are strong enough to affect Milgauss, watch is the last thing you would worry about. You are likely to have your hand flying towards the magnetic field with your watch still working properly.
georgekart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 08:59 AM   #9
jason10mm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: TN, USA
Posts: 161
For actual functional performance there is zero difference and they ALL perform miserably compared to a gshock or citizen ecodrive ( possible exception is a spring drive grand seiko). Rolex holds value a bit better, that is all.
jason10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:03 AM   #10
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,527
Ask on the Omega Forum, they'll know.

Actually, most of us don't dive deep, pilot jets or work in heavy magnetic scenarios... whatever that is, so go for what looks best and holds value (the Rolex).
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:19 AM   #11
watchmavan
"TRF" Member
 
watchmavan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,166
How Do Rolexes Stack Up Against the Competition

You're asking this on a ROLEX forum! Seriously?

Although this could be funny to watch the Fanboys come out to play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
watchmavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:21 AM   #12
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,619
There is no competition.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:23 AM   #13
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
There is no competition.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:26 AM   #14
MTBer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junior_ View Post
Sub beats the Omega Seamaster every day of the week (though the Seamaster is a great watch). Only place the Seamaster 300 comes close to the Sub is antimagnetic.
Out of curiosity, what do you mean “comes close”? Omega has Rolex absolutely beaten in terms of advertised resistance to magnetic fields.
MTBer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:28 AM   #15
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,652
They pretty much do take the crown (no pun intended) in virtually all diver related categories.

Nothing really comes close, although they have moved from tool to overengineered in the last 8 years.

It’s hard to find a better GMT or explorer too.

Step into the dress arena and complications/grand complications and all you have to ask yourself is have you ever seen a Cellini posted on the WRUW threads?

Lange, PP and JLC have that covered.

Contenous issue, but omega do better chronographs. Rolex’s refusal to covert the past is damanaging what their Daytona could be. They are trying too hard to be different yet they had it with their 6263.

The speedmaster is still classic because it stays true to itself and wether or not you enjoy the LEs they give you variety. The CK and trillogy broadarrow both being affordable with vintage design and the perfect 39.4mm size.
bp1000 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 09:47 AM   #16
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
In real world terms of use, I’d say they are pretty much equal.

I prefer the Rolex brand and it’s aesthetics.
I agree it's very personal, I've owned all three and enjoyed them but the Sub is the only one that I have now, altho I really like the new SMP with blue bezel and grey dial, a TT that is pretty unique.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 10:13 AM   #17
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
Seiko and Omega have better lume.

Hard to argue otherwise
Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 10:17 AM   #18
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,443
Rolex makes great watches...and so do several other manufacturers.

How do does Rolex stack up to the others? Very favorably, I think.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 10:27 AM   #19
blown5.0
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 416
I realize I would get some bias on a Rolex forum, but I guess the reality is most are pretty capable. It's just a question of how well the company crafts their narrative.
blown5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 10:38 AM   #20
Junior_
"TRF" Member
 
Junior_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 658
How Do Rolexes Stack Up Against the Competition

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTBer View Post
Out of curiosity, what do you mean “comes close”? Omega has Rolex absolutely beaten in terms of advertised resistance to magnetic fields.


That’s what I meant. Seamaster is better in terms of anti-magnetic, given the silicone balance wheel. This is what makes it come close. But not beat.
Junior_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 10:53 AM   #21
Greenwich Mean Time
"TRF" Member
 
Greenwich Mean Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: PNW
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 452
I don't know of any brand that is as good as Rolex when you consider the whole package. Sure one might have better lume, another might have as good or better a movement. But IMO they don't have the iconic look that is Rolex. At least in my not so humble opinion.
__________________
116710LN Current
16610 Sold
1675 Gifted
Greenwich Mean Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 10:53 AM   #22
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,504
For quite some time, dive computers have made dive watches relegated to "backup only" status. Combine that with owner's of Rolex dive watches only actually using them as dive watches at way less than 1% of the time, and it's pretty easy to conclude that the difference between a Rolex dive watch and a Casio Duro is negligible.
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 11:10 AM   #23
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
The 50 fathoms is an awesome watch. Pretty close call on that one.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 11:18 AM   #24
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
In terms of the differentiation the other brands. however in my practice the rolex is more robust and often keeps better time longer than ap breitling or omega. In terms of waterproofing, hard to beat Rolex. GMT vs Navitimer, very different watches almost impossible to compare...

In terms of anti-magnetic Omega may have a slight advantage.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 12:12 PM   #25
Calatrava r
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 10,517
I suspect the differences you ask about are insignificant. Rolex is about looks and preferences with nice value retention as a bonus.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 12:32 PM   #26
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
I have a $500 Seiko dive watch on now that would preform as well as a Sub right now if I were to go for a dive. Probably better infact, the lume is so much better.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 12:41 PM   #27
007_Omega
"TRF" Member
 
007_Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 897
Ok, I'll try to actually answer your question without just screaming Rolex.

Diving Use-Rolex is king. There is an excellent article online where a diver compares various different popular divers and he states that the Submariner is the best. The "Bond" 300m Seamaster is a joke of a professional diver. The rotating bezel is hard to grip and use which is a big no no when you are wearing diving gloves and need to actually use the thing. Not to mention a manual helium escape valve for a watch with 300m of water resistance...


Aviation- Would you rather have a GMT or a slide rule calculator on your wrist? I'll take the GMT hand. Rolex wins again.


Magnetic Resistance- This where Rolex loses. Milgauss is using very outdated technology and Omega has surpassed Rolex in anti-magnetism. Strong rumors of a 2019 Milgauss which will probably come with a new top of the line anti-magnetic movement.
007_Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 12:42 PM   #28
Jrcigar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junior_ View Post
That’s what I meant. Seamaster is better in terms of anti-magnetic, given the silicone balance wheel. This is what makes it come close. But not beat.
You think 15 thousand gauss is “close”?
Jrcigar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 12:49 PM   #29
Slurve30
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Watch: 114270
Posts: 91
My first "high end" watch I purchased was a "Bond" Seamaster 300m and it will always be a special watch to me. I like the looks of it better than the sub, but if you're actually diving or timing with it, the sub is better. The bezel on the SMP is hard to get a hold of and turn and pretty much impossible to do with wet hands.
Slurve30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2019, 12:52 PM   #30
Tha Baron
"TRF" Member
 
Tha Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Middle West
Posts: 1,073
99% of the people who own these watches don't use these watches to dive, fly or work at CERN. Today, it's just marketing...
Tha Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.