ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 September 2017, 08:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 147
|
Lug to Lug Width for new PAM 1392 vs 1312
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD.
Here are the specs I have so far: Panerai 1392 Diameter = 42.0 mm Case thickness = 13.2 mm Lug width = 22.0 mm Lug to Lug - ? Panerai 1312 Diameter = 44.0 mm Case thickness = 15.6 mm Lug width = 24mm Lug to Lug - ? Anyone have the missing info? Many thanks in advance! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
21 September 2017, 11:01 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 108
|
1312 lug to lug is 53.5 mm
I'd be curious about weight as well, but I don't have a small scale on hand. |
21 September 2017, 09:34 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 147
|
That's pretty compact. The overall watch is essentially the same width as my 42mm Explorer II, if you count the bracelet overhang.
Now if someone could produce a similar pic for PAM 1392 :-) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
29 September 2017, 01:31 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 147
|
So to summarize:
Panerai 1392 Diameter = 42.0 mm Case thickness = 13.2 mm Lug width = 22 mm Lug to Lug = 48 mm Panerai 1312 Diameter = 44.0 mm Case thickness = 15.6 mm Lug width = 24 mm Lug to Lug = 53.5 mm Thank you everyone! Hope this helps those trying to decide between the two. |
29 September 2017, 02:46 AM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,469
|
The measurement for the thickness of the 1312 seems off. That seems more like the 312's measurement. I was under the impression that the 1392 and 1312 were the same thickness, just like the 312 and 392.
|
29 September 2017, 06:04 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 268
|
Lug to Lug Width for new PAM 1392 vs 1312
Quote:
I think the OP got the thickness right. The 312 is close to 18mm thick. The 1312 is supposed to be around 2.5mm thinner. I’ve seen them side by side. Quite the difference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
29 September 2017, 06:21 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,030
|
Too thin for 1392, cru is right
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.