The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 March 2018, 02:48 AM   #31
KrismanX
"TRF" Member
 
KrismanX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Kristofer
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: my feet.
Posts: 2,364
Yea thats nice and all; but can I get it wet?
__________________
No sticker left behind.

"Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late."

"All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us."


ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014
KrismanX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2018, 01:42 PM   #32
Trouble15
"TRF" Member
 
Trouble15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by RW16610 View Post
Anything associated with the VW group is extremely off-putting for me. I personally think it's a real shame when some legendary car companies get acquired by companies like this.
Well said.
Trouble15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2018, 01:54 PM   #33
Townshend
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Carl F, AP
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by enjoythemusic View Post
Buyer Beware

After dealing with the VW Group, no thanks. Was a repeat customer for the Bentley product, and the GTC was the second. It was a POS having expensive known defects ($5k hose defect, $17k glass in convert top just falls out, etc) and VW Group didn't seem to give a cr@p. VW's inherent engineering defects seem to be not their concern, and they don't seem to care about repeat customers either.

Hard pass on anything from the VW Group.
Which MYs? On my 3rd Bentley and no issues.. 09 GT, 14 GTC, 13 GT Speed
Townshend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2018, 02:11 PM   #34
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,925
Its an impressive piece of automotive engineering but I just don't see the value in it at 3 million
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2018, 03:27 PM   #35
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Townshend View Post
Which MYs? On my 3rd Bentley and no issues.. 09 GT, 14 GTC, 13 GT Speed
GT 06 and GTC 07, both bought used from from dealer who gave them a clean bill of health (each had around 27k miles). Yes, only years later realized the early models seem to be horror stories and the newer ones appear to be better. Still, the way i felt like cooperate treated me was.... So it's not just the costs.


Guys on 6Speed forum have found extraordinary markup of Bentley parts (reboxed Audi and VW parts really, at far higher cost). Alignment costs is insane, from Benetley service, yet the same from a VW or Audi dealer is 1/2 or less. Overall, between the crazy high depreciation and TCO it was the single worst car decision ever for me, and have had a Ferrari 308 that i tracked ~40 days a year and raced in SCCA Formula 2000 for two years so ongoing costs within a range is acceptable, yet the Bentley was in another league of crazy.

Over $15k+ a year loss. Glad i didn't buy new, as there's 50% off a Bentley that's only a few years old. Come to think of it, dollar-wise Bentley GTs might be amongst the worst depreciating cars in the industry.

For those curious, here's a 2015 Bentley GTC with 15,250 miles
Original MSRP $263,270
For sale from Bentley dealer $154,270
That's $109,000 loss in three years 15k miles.

http://www.bentleyboston.com/used/Be...b9a6132b8b.htm

My humble congrats to you kind sir. Nice cars and glad yours have been great. Truly hope they do well for you, for myself and guys online the story seems to be a bit different.
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2018, 03:49 PM   #36
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock View Post
It's not a pretty car is it.
Forget you know what it is, how fast it goes and what it costs.
You'd go "Geez, that's a bit weird looking".
The EB110 was an interesting looking car and it didn't look out of place during it's time as there were some other pretty wild looking cars (e.g., Diablo), but I've always said that they Veyron was a horrible looking car. It's seriously ugly... the Pontiac Aztek of supercars.

The Chiron looks much nicer, but still ins't a great looking car IMO.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.