ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 January 2014, 01:37 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East Coast US
Watch: Richard Mille...
Posts: 450
|
Emergency V. Emergency Mission
Looking at purchasing an Emergency or Emergency Mission. The watch will be worn while flying as well as during normal activities like showering, some swimming, basically an everyday watch when I am not wearing a suit. I see that the Emergency is only water resistant to 30m! (3 bar), which would really disqualify it from showering and swimming, correct? I understand the WR rating is based on pressure to the case and not actual water depth. The Emergency Mission on the other hand is WR to 100m, which seems more suitable for the above activities.
Thoughts and experiences welcome. Matt |
4 January 2014, 01:44 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,812
|
The new Emergency is water resistant to 5 bars as noted in the technical data section on their website.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too |
4 January 2014, 01:56 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East Coast US
Watch: Richard Mille...
Posts: 450
|
the new emergency is also pushing 15k USD. Im looking to stick with the 'older' emergency or emergency mission.
|
4 January 2014, 03:09 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
Didn't realize that had gone up that much....
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
4 January 2014, 06:36 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East Coast US
Watch: Richard Mille...
Posts: 450
|
yup....15-16k
|
8 January 2014, 11:56 AM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: Westchester NY
Watch: 116500 116518LN
Posts: 5,874
|
Had an emergency for about 8 months. Great watch, comfortable on the wrist, definitely a tool watch. Kind of miss it....
__________________
Remember what matters. Value everyday |
9 January 2014, 04:17 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Thousand Oaks
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,017
|
|
9 January 2014, 04:33 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
they do turn up second hand at some bargain prices ,,, factor in a service and your laughing... if your flying at -30m i dont want to be a passenger...
|
9 January 2014, 07:59 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
|
|
9 January 2014, 10:45 AM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Resistant_mark |
|
15 January 2014, 12:03 PM | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
30 Meters 100 Feet 3 ATM This level will easily withstand splashes or brief immersion in water, or getting caught in the rain. However, it is not sufficiently resistant for swimming or bathing. |
|
15 January 2014, 12:04 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 396
|
Water Resistant 3 ATM or 30 m Suitable for everyday use. Splash/rain resistant. NOT suitable for showering, bathing, swimming, snorkelling, water related work and fishing.
|
15 January 2014, 12:06 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 396
|
to the defence of some. most think that 30m means the watch can go 30m under water.
common, VERY common misconception. I for one only take anything rated 100m plus in shower, pool, water etc. Many say the speedy pro at 50m is fine for swimming but i simply would not take that chance. |
15 January 2014, 12:08 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 396
|
heres a reference chart:
Water resistance rating Suitability Remarks Water Resistant 3 ATM or 30 m Suitable for everyday use. Splash/rain resistant. NOT suitable for showering, bathing, swimming, snorkelling, water related work and fishing. NOT suitable for diving. Water Resistant 5 ATM or 50 m Suitable for swimming, white water rafting, non-snorkeling water related work, and fishing. NOT suitable for diving. Water Resistant 10 ATM or 100 m Suitable for recreational surfing, swimming, snorkeling, sailing and water sports. NOT suitable for diving. Water Resistant 20 ATM or 200 m Suitable for professional marine activity, serious surface water sports and skin diving. Suitable for skin diving. Diver's 100 m Minimum ISO standard (ISO 6425) for scuba diving at depths NOT suitable for saturation diving. Diver's 100 m and 150 m watches are generally old(er) watches. Diver's 200 m or 300 m Suitable for scuba diving at depths NOT suitable for saturation diving. Typical ratings for contemporary diver's watches. Diver's 300+ m for mixed-gas diving Suitable for saturation diving (helium enriched environment). Watches designed for mixed-gas diving will have the DIVER’S WATCH L M FOR MIXED-GAS DIVING additional marking to point this out. |
15 January 2014, 12:12 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 11,062
|
They new is giant and expensive.
The old one is using a frequency that is being retired, isn't it. I'd say look elsewhere. |
31 August 2015, 07:55 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
|
I have both Titanium and Mission. For water activities, recommend Mission. However, Titanium has 2nd time zone, alarm, count down, compass bezel. Titanium is smaller and much lighter even with UTC on the bracelet. I wear my Mission on Bob's canvas deployment strap.
|
31 August 2015, 10:54 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
I'm sorry. I like the idea. But that's nuts. In aviation dollars that would buy a lot of safety equipment and transponders w ADSB and emergency locator equipment. The idea is great, but that's one whopper of a price tag on a breitling or anything quarts.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.