The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 September 2014, 12:58 PM   #1
sennheiserz
"TRF" Member
 
sennheiserz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: ♛ + Ω +
Posts: 601
My thoughts on the Apple Watch

I haven't been blogging as much as I should be, so I took some time today to write up my initial reaction to the Apple Watch reveal. Curious to know what you all think!

http://www.wristtimes.com/blog-1/201...n-apples-watch

__________________
My Watch Blog - http://www.wristtimes.com

Collection: Rolex Sub NDc 114060 | Omega SMP 861 | Apple Watch SS
sennheiserz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2014, 01:01 PM   #2
BonitaBeast
"TRF" Member
 
BonitaBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NJ / Philippines
Posts: 189
I kinda like it! I would get the Apple Sport with some rubber straps.
BonitaBeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2014, 10:56 PM   #3
tfly212
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Terry
Location: New York City
Watch: Daytona or BLNR
Posts: 491
Probably the best write up I have seen so far.

"For the general public, this thing will be in a drawer almost as fast as a Galaxy gear once you start to forget it on the charger in the morning, which is propriety so you have to bring it everywhere with you."

That sums it up. We can argue aesthetics, functionality and usefulness but the battery life is the issue. People expect a watch to pretty much always be running...even WIS sometimes complain about having to wind a mechanical...imagine what the general public will do when they have to plug it in every night. I got my wife a YM 1 and she still hasn't fully grasped that if she doesn't wear it for 2 days or so it will need to be wound.

I doubt the functionality will make it worth dragging yet another proprietary cable around with you.
tfly212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 12:26 AM   #4
HickoryStick
"TRF" Member
 
HickoryStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Watch: Explorer 214270
Posts: 118
Great write-up
__________________



I plan on living forever...so far, so good
HickoryStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 01:25 AM   #5
Rogdogg
"TRF" Member
 
Rogdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,117
Nice write up. Well done. I think you have it out very nicely

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Rogdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:36 AM   #6
manuu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: M
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex CHNR
Posts: 186
Nice write up. But, you made a whole bunch of assumptions about battery life. They are shipping this in the first qtr next year. Gives them enough time to fine tune battery life. The reason they didn't specify battery life numbers is because they probably don't have the final numbers yet. So any discussion on battery life is moot.
manuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:27 AM   #7
watchdog507
"TRF" Member
 
watchdog507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYZ, RSW
Watch: Rose Gold
Posts: 1,675
Bluetooth can be pretty rough on battery capacity. I'm sure that they will tune it. It doesn't have a sleep monitor on the health side and this could explain why. It needs to charge at night, not to be working at monitoring your sleep.
watchdog507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:49 AM   #8
Pix
"TRF" Member
 
Pix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: midwest
Watch: SS Datejust
Posts: 1,288
I would wait for the 3rd or 4th generation, thats when they get the products right. I don't want to hear "you're wearing it wrong" as an excuse!
Pix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:56 AM   #9
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Very detailed analysis. Good pick-up about the battery life: when manufacturers omit a key area of interest, there is usually a reason and it is seldom positive.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:45 AM   #10
tfly212
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Terry
Location: New York City
Watch: Daytona or BLNR
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
Very detailed analysis. Good pick-up about the battery life: when manufacturers omit a key area of interest, there is usually a reason and it is seldom positive.
Absolutely. If it lasted a week they would have been touting it like crazy.
tfly212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 05:11 AM   #11
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
I wasn't too blown away. I'm keeping my Rolex and AP's.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
apple , watch


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.