ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: SD vs SD | |||
Sea Dweller 116600 40mm | 284 | 50.62% | |
Sea Dweller 126600 43mm | 277 | 49.38% | |
Voters: 561. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29 November 2020, 10:14 PM | #121 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 12,810
|
|
29 November 2020, 10:15 PM | #122 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: -
Posts: 351
|
Sea Dweller vs. Sea Dweller?
Quote:
I agree with you, they are both good watches. I'm part of the "very few" who use them for their "intended role" ... underwater Sea-Dweller 126600 Mk1, Dec. 2017, Raja Ampat, Indonesia |
|
30 November 2020, 06:05 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 198
|
Good to see,feel a fraud, as a non swimmer wearing a watch like this! Really good picture of a great piece in correct environment. Use and enjoy!
|
30 November 2020, 06:53 PM | #124 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 8,801
|
All Sea-Dwellers are excellent watches. My wife has 16600. I have 126660, but used to own 126600, so I've had quite a few of them. All great pieces. Wish I had a 116600.
|
1 December 2020, 08:46 AM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 161
|
I voted for the 16600 which is my first Rolex. I absolutely love it!
The Sea Dweller model went from 40mm to 43mm with no added depth rating. The Deep Sea is very large but it comes with added capabilities. You add the cyclop and the two-tone version on the 126600 than did not exist prior on the Sea Dweller line. Rolex gave us a quality watch as always with a new movement but it feels like a fashion watch |
11 December 2020, 05:11 PM | #126 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,102
|
|
12 December 2020, 09:23 AM | #127 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: christos
Location: GR
Watch: datejust
Posts: 15
|
Sd 43
|
12 December 2020, 10:13 AM | #128 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,614
|
I hardly ever go for a watch larger than 40 - 41mm
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
13 December 2020, 03:12 AM | #129 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,906
|
Of course sd43 is a real sea-dweller
Some think seadweller is all about lack of cyclops. Seadweller is a seadweller due to the deeper depth rating via hev. And they are all super-submariner, as they should be. Where were all these sd4k lovers 3-5 years ago when they were just sitting in the store display due to lack of interest in them?
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.