ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

tudorman8276 · 6 May 2010, 07:38 AM

...SPECIAL NOTE: SPRINGER/BAGEL/STEVE M are not allowed to play with us on this one!

...I do NOT want ANYONE to report this for several days so that EVERYONE interested can learn what I have said before on the forum about these watches.

...I am NOT going to say anything until you all have commented about this watch!

...seller: alexchun39588

ROLEX TUDOR OYSTER STAINLESS AUTOMATIC MAN WATCH

ROLEX TUDOR OYSTER STAINLESS AUTOMATIC MAN

CASE:STAINLESS,SCREW ON BACK SIGNED,

CROWN:SCREW DOWN ROLEX CROWN MOVEMENT: AUTOMATIC SIGNED TUDOR
CASE: CASE NUMBER IS 9050,CASE LOOKS GREAT,ORIGINAL ROLEX OYSTER CASE,SIGNED SCREW ON BACK MARKED TUDOR #9050
CASE MEASURES APPROX 35MM IN DIAMETER WITHOUT CROWN AND LUGS.
DIAL: DIAL IS BLACK IN COLOR

WORLD USPS EMS $15.
Least than 5 feedback,please not bid

http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-TUDOR-OYST...item19bc06c1cf

front-dial.JPG

mdl#.JPG

ser#.JPG

case back.JPG

jcherskine · 6 May 2010, 07:46 AM

Can we start with the long letter E on the caseback?

tudorman8276 · 6 May 2010, 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcherskine

Can we start with the long letter E on the caseback?

...looking/commenting.

...FORGOT to mention...SPRINGER/BAGEL/STEVE M...NOT allowed in here...

jcherskine · 6 May 2010, 07:59 AM

9050 looks as though it has been engraved by hand?

Jackxv · 6 May 2010, 08:06 AM

Wrong caseback, millgaus model number.

Wrong dial, no tritium except hands. Second hand too long, propably refinished on non original baseplate.

Case engraving is redone, engraving space should be brushed.

It looks like complete fake, propably bezel is rolex 16030.

Water resistant movement ?

Jack

Nicko · 6 May 2010, 08:11 AM

That dial is hideous Stan! Look at the size of the Rose!!!!

jcherskine · 6 May 2010, 08:12 AM

Are the hands correct for this model?

Nicko · 6 May 2010, 08:13 AM

It's a 3 million serial, and when did Tudor switch from the rose to the shield? 3 Mil is an awful high serial if it's supposed to be a rose.

tudorman8276 · 6 May 2010, 09:14 AM

...the MOST OBVIOUS has NOT been talked about yet!!

Flaxmoore · 6 May 2010, 09:31 AM

Looks like no hyphen in self-winding, and that font for Tudor on the caseback is weird.

tudorman8276 · 6 May 2010, 09:39 AM

...keep looking/commenting.

...for a moment, I thought Nicko had it.

Jackxv · 6 May 2010, 10:17 AM

Serials don't come up to 3 million.

Jack

Safetrends · 6 May 2010, 10:25 AM

The rose looks wacked.
T SWISS T
Is this a Rolex with a Tudor

tudorman8276 · 6 May 2010, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackxv

Serials don't come up to 3 million.

Jack

...this seller was stupid enough to SHOW the SN - SEVEN digits.

...Rolex/Tudor, has NEVER used MORE than six NUMERIC digits!!! The earliest Tudors used 5 digits.

...the large Rose dial is good. There were BOTH small and large.

...I own a couple large Rose dialed Tudors-BEAUTIFUL watches.

...the dial may be a refi, but it IS genuine. I have actually seen sellers GLUE dials to the front of otherwise genuine movements (mix-match) and then stuff it all into a case and sell it.

...that is what has happened here. genuine guts out of a worn out case into a COUNTERFEIT case!

...NOW you all can R E P O R T away!!!

Safetrends · 6 May 2010, 10:45 AM

I am going back to Rolex.

Nicko · 6 May 2010, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackxv

Serials don't come up to 3 million.

Jack

That's what I was trying to say...

blaine mattison · 6 May 2010, 04:34 PM

yes the 7 number serial number but to include the following

1. the rose on the dial is to low. out of position
2. the arrow hour markers painted. applied type is correct
3. the big rose dial is before the 9050 ref number of tudor
4. 9050 is a ref number for a date
5. wrong script/style on the numbers inbetween the lugs
6. marking of the number to deep
7. the movement is not a eta 2784
8. movement marked "water resistant"
9. the case back is fake
10. the 1019 ref. on case back (rolex milguass)
11. the case back doesn't not say stainless steel
12. the crown is fake/aftermarket
so if this discovered. i am sure that the hands, crystal, case
and all parts down to the last screw not geniune

BASSETHOUNDS · 6 May 2010, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaine mattison

yes the 7 number serial number but to include the following

1. the rose on the dial is to low. out of position
2. the arrow hour markers painted. applied type is correct
3. the big rose dial is before the 9050 ref number of tudor
4. 9050 is a ref number for a date
5. wrong script/style on the numbers inbetween the lugs
6. marking of the number to deep
7. the movement is not a eta 2784
8. movement marked "water resistant
9. the case back is fake
10. the 1019 ref. on case back (rolex milguass)
11. the case back doen't not say stainless steel
12. the crown is fake/aftermarket
so if this discovered. i am sure that the hands, crystal, case
and all parts down to the last screw not geniune

I guess we can safely say it is FUNGUS

tudorman8276 · 6 May 2010, 10:38 PM

...forgot that he lurks here sometimes...W E L L - D O N E.. guys...

springer · 6 May 2010, 11:57 PM

Wow. Can I say that at least!

tudorman8276 · 7 May 2010, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by springer

Wow. Can I say that at least!

...didn't want you guys to spoil the fun for the others...

wildsidemtb · 7 May 2010, 12:09 AM

Are you sure it's fake? I'm still not sure! Lol

springer · 7 May 2010, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tudorman8276

...didn't want you guys to spoil the fun for the others...

Roger that Stan. That thing had a lot going for it, going to the can that is...

tudorman8276 · 12 May 2010, 02:03 AM

6 May 2010, 07:38 AM	#1
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...C L A S S...is in session...COMMENTS, please... ...SPECIAL NOTE: SPRINGER/BAGEL/STEVE M are not allowed to play with us on this one! ...I do NOT want ANYONE to report this for several days so that EVERYONE interested can learn what I have said before on the forum about these watches. ...I am NOT going to say anything until you all have commented about this watch! ...seller: alexchun39588 ROLEX TUDOR OYSTER STAINLESS AUTOMATIC MAN WATCH ROLEX TUDOR OYSTER STAINLESS AUTOMATIC MAN CASE:STAINLESS,SCREW ON BACK SIGNED, CROWN:SCREW DOWN ROLEX CROWN MOVEMENT: AUTOMATIC SIGNED TUDOR CASE: CASE NUMBER IS 9050,CASE LOOKS GREAT,ORIGINAL ROLEX OYSTER CASE,SIGNED SCREW ON BACK MARKED TUDOR #9050 CASE MEASURES APPROX 35MM IN DIAMETER WITHOUT CROWN AND LUGS. DIAL: DIAL IS BLACK IN COLOR WORLD USPS EMS $15. Least than 5 feedback,please not bid http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-TUDOR-OYST...item19bc06c1cf front-dial.JPG mdl#.JPG ser#.JPG case back.JPG

6 May 2010, 08:06 AM	#5
Jackxv "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 969	Back Wrong caseback, millgaus model number. Wrong dial, no tritium except hands. Second hand too long, propably refinished on non original baseplate. Case engraving is redone, engraving space should be brushed. It looks like complete fake, propably bezel is rolex 16030. Water resistant movement ? Jack

6 May 2010, 09:39 AM	#11
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...the MOST OBVIOUS guys...on the CASE... ...keep looking/commenting. ...for a moment, I thought Nicko had it.

6 May 2010, 10:17 AM	#12
Jackxv "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 969	Serial Serials don't come up to 3 million. Jack

6 May 2010, 10:38 PM	#19
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...dadgummitt...forgot about BANNING Blaine from this... ...forgot that he lurks here sometimes...W E L L - D O N E.. guys...

6 May 2010, 07:46 AM	#2
jcherskine "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: John Location: Scotland Watch: DJII 116300 Posts: 1,970	Can we start with the long letter E on the caseback?

6 May 2010, 07:59 AM	#4
jcherskine "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: John Location: Scotland Watch: DJII 116300 Posts: 1,970	9050 looks as though it has been engraved by hand?

6 May 2010, 08:11 AM	#6
Nicko Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Not here anymore Posts: 4,787	That dial is hideous Stan! Look at the size of the Rose!!!!

6 May 2010, 08:12 AM	#7
jcherskine "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: John Location: Scotland Watch: DJII 116300 Posts: 1,970	Are the hands correct for this model?

6 May 2010, 08:13 AM	#8
Nicko Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Not here anymore Posts: 4,787	It's a 3 million serial, and when did Tudor switch from the rose to the shield? 3 Mil is an awful high serial if it's supposed to be a rose.

6 May 2010, 09:14 AM	#9
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...you guys are doing good...CONTINUE... ...the MOST OBVIOUS has NOT been talked about yet!!

6 May 2010, 09:31 AM	#10
Flaxmoore Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Casey Location: Toledo, Ohio Watch: Alpha Milsub Posts: 704	Looks like no hyphen in self-winding, and that font for Tudor on the caseback is weird.

6 May 2010, 10:25 AM	#13
Safetrends Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: David Walz Location: San Diego CA USA Watch: my hand. :) Posts: 9,156	The rose looks wacked. T SWISS T Is this a Rolex with a Tudor

6 May 2010, 10:45 AM	#15
Safetrends Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: David Walz Location: San Diego CA USA Watch: my hand. :) Posts: 9,156	I am going back to Rolex.

6 May 2010, 04:34 PM	#17
blaine mattison "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: blaine Location: memphis Watch: my next find Posts: 1,060	yes the 7 number serial number but to include the following 1. the rose on the dial is to low. out of position 2. the arrow hour markers painted. applied type is correct 3. the big rose dial is before the 9050 ref number of tudor 4. 9050 is a ref number for a date 5. wrong script/style on the numbers inbetween the lugs 6. marking of the number to deep 7. the movement is not a eta 2784 8. movement marked "water resistant" 9. the case back is fake 10. the 1019 ref. on case back (rolex milguass) 11. the case back doesn't not say stainless steel 12. the crown is fake/aftermarket so if this discovered. i am sure that the hands, crystal, case and all parts down to the last screw not geniune

6 May 2010, 11:57 PM	#20
springer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,212	Wow. Can I say that at least! __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

7 May 2010, 12:09 AM	#22
wildsidemtb Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Australia Watch: Sea Dweller, 5512 Posts: 602	Are you sure it's fake? I'm still not sure! Lol

12 May 2010, 02:03 AM	#24
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...class is now OVER...so is this listing...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)