ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 December 2012, 03:36 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Me too. I just can't stand the thought of having to get rid of a watch I like so that I can pick up another one. I find collecting to be much more enjoyable than flipping.
|
3 December 2012, 10:30 AM | #32 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Jim
Location: Westchester NY
Watch: 116500 116518LN
Posts: 5,876
|
The Explorer I has something that the Omega just can't compete with: history. The history that goes with the Explorer I and what it represents to Rolex is just fantastic. I will say that the Omega is a great watch and the design is modern and fantastic, it would be a great addition to anyone's collection just not the sole entity .
__________________
Remember what matters. Value everyday |
4 December 2012, 12:41 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 157
|
If you are open to another possibility, may I suggest the Grand Seiko?
Absolutely outstanding in every way. (photo from the web) |
4 December 2012, 01:42 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Kyle
Location: PA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 404
|
IMO, on the wrist, the Explorer blows the AT out of the water.
Off the wrist, the watches look very similar. One big turnoff for me is the pointy hour markers combined with the dial texture is too much for me. The EXP on the wrist is pure perfection. I totally understand your lack of date situation, but I would NOT give up the EXP for the Omega. The Omega just looks awkward on the wrist IMO!
__________________
Rolex Datejust II 116300 (new watch swagger in full effect) |
4 December 2012, 01:56 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern CA.
Watch: JLC~AP~RLX~PAM~UN
Posts: 360
|
That explorer is pure perfection...if it was a bit bigger, the entire forum would be all over it, just like the GMT II C I would not do the trade.
|
4 December 2012, 07:35 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: M
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex CHNR
Posts: 186
|
The omega AT is the superior watch in every way. From the finish and details.. to the movement. You only need to see the above pictures with both the watches to see the difference. And that pic of the AT on the OEM leather is just beautiful.
|
5 December 2012, 11:54 AM | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Just went to Boca Raton. The Rolex watches, as much as I try to be objective, indeed do not have the wrist presence compared to any modern day Omega. The Rolexes are too small and too shiny and just don't compare in curb appeal. You photo captures my point. Not all will agree, I understand. |
|
12 December 2012, 11:17 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Both are very nice watches. If you love your Exp. I would not part with it. The teck stripes on the AT are subtle in most lights.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
13 December 2012, 04:30 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Toronto
Posts: 171
|
Curious which watch you all would consider a better choice for a 65th birthday present for my Dad. He, like most people, recognizes a Rolex as a quality watch but not so sure he's all that familiar with Omega.
I'm leaning towards the Explorer for him. Opinions? |
13 December 2012, 05:59 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,031
|
I ended up purchasing an Explorer I after trying one on, and had admired it in photos for some time. I tried to like the Aqua Terra, but it never grew on me now matter how many times I tried it on. I really dislike the arabic minute markings which I find to be busy. Yet I really like the hour markings on the Explorer I. Something about the symmetry The legibility of the AT is much better due to the size and shape of the hands as well as the layering of the dial elements, not to mention the excellent anti-reflective coating Omega uses. But it all just feels too busy to my eye, which of course is a personal thing. While the 8500 is more modern, the ExpI movement has proven to be amazingly accurate if I rest it crown down at night. For what it's worth, my other nice watch is a POC 9300.
|
5 February 2013, 03:58 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 51
|
Impressive!
__________________
Explorer 39mm |
5 February 2013, 05:21 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,307
|
The Exp is a great looking watch... but... the styling and design that has gone into the AT is, IMHO, far superior to Rolex's offerings. The level of detail throughout the watch makes the Explorer very plain. Rolex is big on history with their design and real lack of modern style updates. Omega has been referred to as more "blingy" with their styling. It just depends on which style sings to you. As for the teak dial, you really need to see it in person to appreciate it. Very similar to the DJ tapestry dials... now those I love... bottom line, I would personally do it. But if you like owning and wearing a Rolex, keep and save. I don't think you can go wrong.
__________________
Waiting for Arrival... Omega Seamaster 120 Automatic Luminox 3950 Orange Luminox Field Watch Day-Date Casio G-Shock Analog/Chrono |
5 February 2013, 06:32 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: Ohio
Watch: 1680
Posts: 340
|
You have a beautiful Explorer. I too have an Exp. I and miss the date feature terribly. But, if anything, I would save up/trade for a EXP. II and not trade for an Omega. I currently have two Omega's (Moon watch & Seamaster Pro 300) and love them, but definitely not the same pedigree.
|
8 February 2013, 07:25 PM | #44 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Well stated. Omegas are smoking the Rolex line up these days. |
|
19 February 2013, 01:23 PM | #45 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 118
|
I'm an Omega fan but if you own an Explorer I wouldn't give it up. It is a beauty. The date is overrated. :P
|
19 February 2013, 07:52 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: A.J.
Location: USA
Watch: TT Yachtmaster II
Posts: 347
|
Explorer 39mm by synth19, on Flickr[/QUOTE] Beautiful and have never seen this model. I really like the larger than usual numbers.. |
21 February 2013, 03:19 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 182
|
Keep the explorer. Outside of the speedmaster and Seamaster/planet ocean lines, Omega's designs aren't as classic.
And just use your smart phone for the date ;) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.