ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 September 2018, 05:53 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 141
|
Thanks everyone for the advice.
The seller was insistent that everything was original , he actually went on so say that the short-fat hands were the original and the long was the service. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 December 2018, 03:58 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Hermosa Beach
Posts: 16
|
The majority opinion is the longer minute and second hands, extending into the minute track, are original for the 1016 and the shorter Submariner hands were common service replacements (ran out of 1016 hands?). One member posted recently that short hands were original to the 1972 model year 1016 and claims back-up research as well as owning his 1972 since new!?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.