LN or BLNR?

[c41006]

Originally Posted by tyler1980

don't buy a watch because its offered. Nothing in your post leads me to believe you want it.

Its close to 10k, so its not the same as the store being out of fruit loops and you deciding to bring home fruity o's instead.

I agree

[CoveWatch]

I agree that you should go try on the LN first, if you haven’t yet, incase it unexpectedly impresses you.... and if not then you have your decision

[HL65]

Blnr

[Brainh18]

Get the one you want that speaks to you. I had and LN and wasn't happy til I traded up to the BLNR. I added a Sub and now I'm set. I'd love a few more, but the checkbook won't allow it currently.

[BobDyl]

Originally Posted by DayDateDream

Hi BobDyl, when you say more versatile, how do you mean?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've had the LN for 10 years now and it basically works ... nearly everywhere and with nearly everything. Shorts & t-shirt to jeans to business casual, and with any type or color of shirt. IMHO, it's too chunky for a finely tailored suit or formal attire. Other than that, it just covers the spectrum from sporty to sophisticated with the polished center links and reflective black bezel.

Lots of BLNR fans on the forum and I think it's a fine watch but some would argue that the splash of blue keeps it slightly less flexible than the LN and total lunatics, not me mind you, argue that it looks like a toy. ;-)

I actually find the whole LN vs BLNR thing a bit ridiculous. I've been wearing GMTs for decades, primarily because I use the second and third timezones constantly for work. GMTs were never Rolex's most popular watches, they always just sat around in the display cases while the subs flew into new owners' hands. But they have always been great and highly functional. So I'm always amazed at how many "discovered" the GMT only when Rolex added a splash of blue to the bezel. It is 99.9% the identical watch to the LN and carrying a big premium, so you'd better like that blue...

But back to my original thought: try it on and see if it's for you...

[DayDateDream]

Originally Posted by BobDyl

I've had the LN for 10 years now and it basically works ... nearly everywhere and with nearly everything. Shorts & t-shirt to jeans to business casual, and with any type or color of shirt. IMHO, it's too chunky for a finely tailored suit or formal attire. Other than that, it just covers the spectrum from sporty to sophisticated with the polished center links and reflective black bezel, which changes color depending on lighting and environment.



Lots of BLNR fans on the forum and I think it's a fine watch but some would argue that the splash of blue keeps it slightly less flexible than the LN and total lunatics, not me mind you, argue that it looks like a toy. ;-)



I actually find the whole LN vs BLNR thing a bit ridiculous. I've been wearing GMTs for decades, primarily because I use the second and third timezones constantly for work. GMTs were never Rolex's most popular watches, they always just sat around in the display cases while the subs flew into new owners' hands. But they have always been great and highly functional. So I'm always amazed at how many "discovered" the GMT only when Rolex added a splash of blue to the bezel. It is 99.9% the identical watch to the LN and carrying a big premium, so you'd better like that blue...

Thanks for the history and insight, much appreciated. I now understand what you mean by versatile. As well as the fickle nature of the consumer bandwagon. I’ve never liked the Daytona or Sub, and doubt I’d buy one. I personally don’t dive nor have need of a tach, but I do find the GMT really useful.

Makes me wonder which model will be the next craze though...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Roger Lococco]

BLNR


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BobDyl]

Originally Posted by DayDateDream

Thanks for the history and insight, much appreciated. I now understand what you mean by versatile. As well as the fickle nature of the consumer bandwagon. I’ve never liked the Daytona or Sub, and doubt I’d buy one. I personally don’t dive nor have need of a tach, but I do find the GMT really useful.

Makes me wonder which model will be the next craze though...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My pleasure. You really can't go wrong, it's a first world problem! There's an old saying on the forum about getting the watch that "sings" to you. I have to say that this is true in my experience, and it's hard to predict exactly what will sing on the wrist...

[JRT]

BLNR for sure.

[zion_rasta]

You may never see a BLNR out in the wild. I have seen two since it was released. LA and Paris.

I have the LN, bought it before the super hero craziness.

If you buy the LN, you’d never need a Sub.

To me, the LN is the silent collector’s watch that will explode in value in 20 years.

Remember the “red” font Sub?

BTW, the LN is now more rare than the Batman...

[harshad4005]

Wait for the BLNR


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nycturbovr6]

I wòuld hold out

[eonflux]

I have an LN (purchased more than 10 years ago).
Prefer the BLNR. Love the blue on the 24-hour hand and bezel.
If you want the BLNR, hold out for it!

[cvera]

I'd just wait

[speedy_master1]

BLNR is a must.

[GMT Aviator]

Tried both. Bought the LN.
You either like the blue or you don’t. The LN for me was the more versatile of the two. Classic black bezel will always go with anything.
Never looked back.

[GSBC]

BLNR - it is a stunning piece. If you settle for the LN, you’ll forever yearn for what could have been.
This watch hobby is not based on “needs”, but “wants”. If you want the BLNR, then don’t ever settle for anything less.

[BadBoyR]

Go for the one you really want. I have both, prefer the LN :)

[Xxmikeyb]

Go and try the LN. I had the same dilemma last year. I always wanted a GMT. I did manage to try on both at different times but the LN sang more and I never regretted not getting the BLNR.

Over a year on and one of my customers has just purchased a BLNR, which again I tried on, this time with both pieces together and I still don't regret buying the LN.

[mattcps]

BLNR you wont regret it, i fell in love with mine as soon as i got it

[Kigan]

116710blnr.

[hai.tranhr]

BLNR is deserved to wait for!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jstan9]

Originally Posted by minute_man

Wait for the one you really want. Don't settle. Especially since you can presently only afford one.

This. And check out the trusted sellers here. They seem to have a steady flow of new and gently pre-loved Batmans.

Get the one you want. This is a big purchase of a brilliant machine built to last a lifetime. Why settle?

(And, full disclosure, I’ve had my BLNR for just over a year now. I don’t think you will be disappointed. It’s worth waiting for : )

[opawlows]

Try calling around to smaller AD's in other provinces. FWIW, I was all hyped up to buy the BLNR based on the internet pictures and countless threads about it, but when given the chance to purchase one it did not speak to me as much as I thought it would. It really is a watch you need to see in person before making the final decision. The LN is no slouch though, I was sitting next to a guy at a Jays game about a month ago who had one and I couldn't stop thinking to myself how nice it is in person!

[anastasevp]

Originally Posted by Ks6pd

The LN is no slouch. It’s a timeless classic.

You can get it and a few things will happen. 1) you’ll possibly move up on their list. 2) you’ll decide you don’t like the way the LN wears (which is the same as a BLNR) flip it and get something other than the BLNR. 3) you get the LN, fall in love with it, and decide you don’t want a BLNR. 4) you get it, enjoy it for several months, then flip it for the BLNR.

I find my LN to be more versitile than my BLNR. Food for thought.

I think that can works


Enviado do meu iPhone usando Tapatalk

[GMTSpas]

My thinking is get the LN. Forming a relationship with an AD is always a great thing. Enjoy the watch until the BLNR comes in. Also, things to consider: You may find attached to the LN and are content. By this time another watch may have caught your eye. You could also sell the LN and use those funds for the BLNR.

[Lemonvr6]

I got the BLNR first. Ended up getting the LN a few years later

[gttime]

Originally Posted by Frank McKay

You guys aren’t getting the OP’s point. He’s implying that the AD will not give him a BLNR or BLRO if he doesn’t make a purchase of a less in demand watch first. Chances of getting a call on a BLNR or BLRO as a first time customer with zero purchase history is slim to none.

OP: Best bet is to pick up tha BLNR in th Gray market. One can be had at DavidSW for 1500+ premium.

Yes this. I picked up my SD43 and new DSSD from David. The prices were reasonable.

I would like a blue SD. I don’t think the prices on those are reasonable so that’s not going to happen.

[crazyjazy]

I was in the same predicament last November. I went with the LN and never looked back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[fskywalker]

Originally Posted by DayDateDream

Hi, new to the Forum here and wanted to get some opinions from the more seasoned members.

Got the call from the AD for an LN .
I actually really want a BLNR or BLRO. However, I’m not an “established client” with the AD yet and they reserve these pieces for their preferred clients on their min 6 month waitlist. And I can only afford one at the moment.

Take it or hold out? Thoughts?

Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Few for sale on the forum, some of them brand new!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro