The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 July 2018, 11:04 PM   #31
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,478
Short answer, no.

The look and feel of the watch is amazing. It's one of my favorite pieces (and no...i didn't spend 40k on it )

The jubilee looks out of place on it, (IMO of course), so in my mind I've got the perfect Pepsi. I may add the Tudor a little later in the year if the secondary prices drop down to reasonable. But mistake...no, I don't think so.

Like the song says, "if lovin' you is wrong, I don't wanna be right..."
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 11:39 PM   #32
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchwatcher View Post
Short answer, no.

The look and feel of the watch is amazing. It's one of my favorite pieces (and no...i didn't spend 40k on it )

The jubilee looks out of place on it, (IMO of course), so in my mind I've got the perfect Pepsi. I may add the Tudor a little later in the year if the secondary prices drop down to reasonable. But mistake...no, I don't think so.

Like the song says, "if lovin' you is wrong, I don't wanna be right..."
⬆️⬆️⬆️ Same thought. I own one, (not for $40k) and the oyster is my first choice for a modern BLRO. And I Agree wholeheartedly with Larry...except...I respectfully differ, in that I think the jubilee looks great. To each their own!
I have bought WG in the past because they’re the one that has an exclusive dial or colors that are appealing to me...other side of the coin...I’ve bought SS for the same reason (Hulk). But at the end of the day, I buy WG because it’s special to ME when I look at, and feel it....otherwise I would’ve pursued the SS version. I just feel blessed that I can make these choices.
Not a mistake by Rolex, and I hope all who acquire the SS version, enjoy the heck out of it!
rmlovett1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 July 2018, 11:39 PM   #33
Roll the Lex
"TRF" Member
 
Roll the Lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by REFZ View Post
It happend to the Skydweller as well, first the PM versions and later the TT and SS versions.

Was that also a mistake?

I think the controversy is that the pm and ss Pepsi case, bezel, dial are EXACTLY the same. The wg and ss models at least have different dials on the sky dweller.

You can make the argument that the difference is in the bracelets with the Pepsi but you can add an oyster bracelet easily.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roll the Lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 12:46 AM   #34
RichM
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
RichM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 28,166
I own the WG BLRO and like my friends above, I truly enjoy the watch. I'm not in the least bit concerned that it was released in SS. I also don't believe the WG model was a mistake and I feel the SS model was a stroke of genius on their part. Also by putting on it on the Jubilee and changing the dial to blue on the PM, helps make all three models different enough to appeal to a wider audience.

I do find it ironic that the BLRO bezel did not get a whole lot of love while it was only available on a PM model. Put the same bezel on the SS model, and it becomes one of the hottest watches out there today.

I'm pretty sure, Rolex knows what it's doing.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day"
TRF #139960
RichM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 01:16 AM   #35
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
Don't believe it to be a mistake. The Jubilee certainly differentiates the WG from SS.
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 01:53 AM   #36
Starwalker
"TRF" Member
 
Starwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,237
Why a mistake? You don’t see complaints from people that have the 116509 being overly similar to the 116520.
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds
Starwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:07 AM   #37
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
The truth that I would not sit well
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:26 AM   #38
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Mickol View Post

I do find it ironic that the BLRO bezel did not get a whole lot of love while it was only available on a PM model.
Well said, my friend. Ironic, indeed.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:27 AM   #39
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenMichael View Post
I know you don’t regret yours. It’s stunning. But how would you feel if a SS version came out that looked the same?
It won't. They will keep the two different. Look at the SkyDweller, different dials.
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 02:57 AM   #40
Vetracer
"TRF" Member
 
Vetracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Vetracer
Location: London
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 577
I much prefer the white gold Pepsi to the new jubilee bracelet version. They’re not that difference in price at them moment too.
Vetracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:06 AM   #41
FinWatch
"TRF" Member
 
FinWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,777
I just Love it—if someone thinks it is a mistake, I am fine whit that. Still loving my Blue Dial Beauty WG! ❤️❤️❤️


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FinWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:10 AM   #42
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,219
Icon20

Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
Fair point but why does it have to be about optics and poor form?

What if someone legitimately wants a 126710 for the movement but prefers the Oyster? What if someone wants the Pan-Am bezel but prefers the durability in daily wear of stainless over gold? What if someone wants all of the above but in a lighter weight configuration? Or, what if someone has wanted a stainless BLRO for four years but the white gold version was either out of their budget or they'd rather own three watches instead of one?

I'm confused why the only answer your see is that the owner must be a poser.
We are talking about Rolexes here so all of us are posers with the gen public unless we prove otherwise, so same applies here, if you genuinely prefer the Oyster and can be bothered to source/swap one over then just state that in your pic posts and it will all be cool.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:12 AM   #43
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Mickol View Post
I own the WG BLRO and like my friends above, I truly enjoy the watch. I'm not in the least bit concerned that it was released in SS. I also don't believe the WG model was a mistake and I feel the SS model was a stroke of genius on their part. Also by putting on it on the Jubilee and changing the dial to blue on the PM, helps make all three models different enough to appeal to a wider audience.

I do find it ironic that the BLRO bezel did not get a whole lot of love while it was only available on a PM model. Put the same bezel on the SS model, and it becomes one of the hottest watches out there today.

I'm pretty sure, Rolex knows what it's doing.
It's certainly hot, but in fairness, Richie, it is still getting a lot of stick for its colours so not all are convinced.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:15 AM   #44
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,741
I'm glad the new SS BLRO is on jubilee vs oyster. If Rolex does release an oyster version of it, IMO that would be just fine since the new WG BLRO comes on a blue dial. I suppose the similarities would then be between the old WG BLRO and the oyster released SS version, since they both sport a black dial, but as a WG owner myself, I really would not care much. The feel of WG is something SS is no match for. They would be similar in looks but quite different in substance.
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:21 AM   #45
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,490
Not a mistake
Buyers should know full well that Rolex might release in SS. They never said they wouldn't

And technically they didn't release exactly the same they released in a jubilee. Yes I know people have retrofitted oyster bracelet onto the new BLRO but it wasn't done by Rolex




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:23 AM   #46
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenMichael View Post
Just sitting here thinking. Was the 18K white gold GMT Master II “Pepsi” a big mistake? How will they ever release a true SS original with an oyster bracelet now without offending every who paid the better part of $40K? I like the new SS Pepsi jubilee sure, but the oyster bracelet is still better and I don’t want to have to create a Franken-Watch. Thoughts?

The upcoming COKE will probably feature an all brushed oyster bracelet. My thoughts only.
ALF61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 03:29 AM   #47
SeaAndSky
"TRF" Member
 
SeaAndSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
In that watch bezel color I prefer the white gold version. It’s not a mistake to me.
SeaAndSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 04:04 AM   #48
BT1985
"TRF" Member
 
BT1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinWatch View Post
I just Love it—if someone thinks it is a mistake, I am fine whit that. Still loving my Blue Dial Beauty WG! ❤️❤️❤️


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I absolutely love the blue dial Pepsi bezel combination. It has ruined the SS version for me. Congrats on this it looks awesome!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BT1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 04:13 AM   #49
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,122
Mistake is a big word. Rolex always introduces things in precious metal first and lets it trickle down to less expensive models. Rolex was very aware people were clamoring for the Pepsi bezel in ceramic. They could have put it on a stainless steel case with an Oyster bracelet at any time once developed. There was a media release at the time stating that making the red/blue bicolor bezel is difficult and as such Rolex was reserving it for the white gold model. That may be true, but it doesn't really matter.

The white gold BLRO with the black dial is now "relatively" rare since it was only produced for a couple of years. Personally I think the blue dial makes more sense on a white gold model anyway as Rolex tends to save blue for precious metal pieces. I doubt we will ever see a blue dial on a stainless GMT or Sub.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 04:59 AM   #50
Eric-London
"TRF" Member
 
Eric-London's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: London
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by hl65 View Post
can’t say a mistake but certainly not ideal for anyone who owns the wg. As for the jubilee it makes the watch imho and very glad they released the 126710 on it versus the oyster. If i want to wear an oyster there are lots of options. So for me what a great change up and again really makes the watch special.
+100
Eric-London is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:02 AM   #51
Eric-London
"TRF" Member
 
Eric-London's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: London
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinWatch View Post
I just Love it—if someone thinks it is a mistake, I am fine whit that. Still loving my Blue Dial Beauty WG! ❤️❤️❤️


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hey brother, you’re killing me with this watch. It looks absolutely fantastic. Congrats.

I can’t find a single piece in the UK.

My AD (WOS from Arum group) are one of the largest buyers of Rolex in Europe and they have zero in the U.K.
Eric-London is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:06 AM   #52
eco8gator
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
It's a great watch...just heavy.
eco8gator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:07 AM   #53
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,906
It was not a big mistake. It was just a mistake.
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:08 AM   #54
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
I don’t think so. The WG is special and certainly feels different on the wrist. I think the WG also has a slightly different appearance than SS does.
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:12 AM   #55
FinWatch
"TRF" Member
 
FinWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by BT1985 View Post
I absolutely love the blue dial Pepsi bezel combination. It has ruined the SS version for me. Congrats on this it looks awesome!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FinWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:12 AM   #56
Fujiman
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
That's how Rolex does it, PM models first, then TT and SS afterwards. Doesn't seem to be a mistake so far, everybody still wants them all.
Not "everybody", I certainly don't. I think Rolex has made a series of mistakes this past decade which I why I'm not interested in buying any of their new watches. But I'm sure there are plenty of people who think Rolex can do no wrong.

When I bought my three over the years, I always felt welcomed and valued. I no longer do.
Fujiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:14 AM   #57
FinWatch
"TRF" Member
 
FinWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric-London View Post
Hey brother, you’re killing me with this watch. It looks absolutely fantastic. Congrats.



I can’t find a single piece in the UK.



My AD (WOS from Arum group) are one of the largest buyers of Rolex in Europe and they have zero in the U.K.


Thanks! It is just amazing—not easy to find.. Good luck for your hunt!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FinWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:47 AM   #58
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,403
Mistake? Eh, it's only money.

Enjoy your time. :)
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 05:49 AM   #59
SG56
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
SG56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Tampa
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 2,674
I'd rather buy the wg than the SS one.
They are both gorgeous watches.

No, not a mistake imo.
__________________
Sea-Dweller 116600 - the manly one
GMT II 16710 - the manly one
Daytona 116500 - the manly-womanly one
Yacht-Master 268622 - the chick version
Speedy Mitsukoshi <3
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAF141C.BA0824 - the chick version

Thank you logan5tx!!! Have to link it. Too long for the signature.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...0&postcount=14
SG56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2018, 11:30 AM   #60
drefrank
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
drefrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 911
Not sure as to the WG Pepsi demand/availability but I do know an AD that has one. If interested please send me a message.
drefrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.