ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 June 2020, 01:37 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 129
|
sub C for 14060m 2 liner or 4?
Ok, so I now have an opportunity to trade my Sub C for a 14060m 2 liner or 4 liner. Looking to the collective wisdom of the forum to help me decide. Here are the details....2 liner is a 2003 model, with uncertain service history. Comes with box/papers. Deal would be trade + some cash to me. The 4 liner is from 2010 and has just been serviced but no box/papers. Deal would be straight trade. Let me know what you think!
|
2 June 2020, 01:49 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
|
|
2 June 2020, 01:54 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,412
|
Nope to both.
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk |
2 June 2020, 01:58 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Keep your Sub C
__________________
|
2 June 2020, 02:34 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,372
|
Quote:
I'll take 10 of those deals please. |
|
2 June 2020, 03:18 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
|
sub C for 14060m 2 liner or 4?
Quote:
I‘ve had this itch on more then one occasion. Each time trying on the 16610 (vs my 116610), I couldn’t do it. Other than case proportions (which look worse in pics on maxi case than in person), the SubC is better in every way. Normally I’d say IMO, but not sure it can be argued - ceramic, solid links and glidelock. I’d no not trade yours. |
|
2 June 2020, 03:34 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
|
I wouldn’t, I’d keep the SubC. And this is coming from a longtime owner and lover of the 14060 2-liner.
|
2 June 2020, 03:50 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,364
|
Keep the sub C.
__________________
Instagram @dcash0615 2FA security active |
2 June 2020, 04:45 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Marc
Location: Germany
Posts: 727
|
As I wrote elsewhere, your Submariner looks perfect on your wrist. Wouldn't do it.
Cheers Marc |
2 June 2020, 04:47 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,355
|
really ?
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
2 June 2020, 04:47 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 44
|
Agree with all above. Keep the SubC
|
2 June 2020, 05:22 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
|
I would pass on those and find a better example
|
2 June 2020, 08:33 PM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,463
|
Keep the SubC. Would trade for a 4-Liner complete set with watch in good condition ... some cash ought to come back your way, but not a lot.
|
2 June 2020, 08:35 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,713
|
What’s your reasoning for the trade OP?
|
2 June 2020, 08:39 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 564
|
In my opinion you either love the 5 digit case or you love the 6 digit. I went with a 16600 sea dweller for a while but came back to the 114060 as I love the maxi plots and hands better.
I would suggest really taking some time to look at the 5 digit over 6 and see what sings to you. From a value standpoint I don’t like what your trade offers are at as the ceramic sub has a value of well over $8k. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2 FACTOR AUTHENTICATION ENABLED. |
2 June 2020, 08:48 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: texas
Posts: 46
|
Keep the C
|
2 June 2020, 08:49 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,262
|
I’ll go against the grain and say go for the 5 digit. The looks, feel and proportions are just so much better than the 6 to me.
If you shop around you should be getting some cash back in the deal rather than a straight swap. A couple of grand at least. Maybe just sell the SubC and then buy a 14060M. Definitely a 2-Liner. It’s an elegant and well balanced dial. Subs with 4 lines of blurb are way OTT. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 June 2020, 11:35 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belmont, CA
Posts: 129
|
Thanks all, but have to say I am surprised by the overwhelming support for keeping the SubC. Thought I’d made the decision to trade but now I’m back on the fence! Someone asked about my rationale for trading. It really boils down to 2 things...heft and bling. I like that the 5 digits are a bit Under the radar. Also, the Sub C is a bit top heavy and just not as comfortable on my wrist as the 5 digits that I’ve tried on. On the flip side, the SubC glide lock can’t be beat. Seems I really need to think this through a bit more. Thanks for all the advice!
|
2 June 2020, 11:40 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,262
|
I was surprised too. You can ask the same question on another day and get a totally different response. It just happens there’s a lot of 6 fans about today. There’s no shortage of love for the 5s if you do a quick search though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 June 2020, 11:41 PM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,849
|
I always ran my 2-line 14060M with a glidelock clasp and a half link, it was the perfect fitting sub with its thinner case and lugs but then I traded it off for an SD43 because I have big wrists. The SD43 fit my bigger wrist size in diameter better but the case was just too thick and bulky, so I recently sold it as well. I wish I had my 14060M back.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
2 June 2020, 11:45 PM | #21 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,061
|
Keep the SubC and if possible add the 5 digit Sub. Short of that I would keep the SubC and enjoy.
If you feel the SubC is top heavy have you tried adjusting the links (#of links on 6 and 12 side), and also how do you wear the watch (loose, tight). I don't have much experience w/ 5 digit watches (I have a Tudor Sub on a strap, and I've worn my dad's 5 digit DJ). While overall a 5 digit is lighter than a 6 digit, the bracelet is also significantly lighter as well so my thought is it would be about the same (again not much experience with 5 digit models) so perhaps someone with both can more accurately help. |
2 June 2020, 11:49 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,102
|
Me too. I wish I had it back for what I sold it for 6 years ago...
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
2 June 2020, 11:52 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
I've also owned a 14060m 4-liner and they wear smaller and much more under the radar. They also use the older hollow-end link bracelets which give it a more narrow stance than the solid end-links. As some others have stated, that's one of the ones I'd like back. |
|
3 June 2020, 01:17 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
If someone offered me a naked 5 digit 14060m as a straight trade for my SubC, full kit, I'd laugh in their face. Maybe it'll change in the future, but as of right now that's a terrible deal for you. If you really want to go from a 6 digit to 5 digit, you're better off to sell your SubC and find a 5 digit sub to buy. You'll end up much better financially that way. |
|
3 June 2020, 01:47 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Scott
Location: Texas
Posts: 280
|
the 5 digit vs 6 digit is personal preference. Only you can decide.
Straight up, is a bad trade. |
3 June 2020, 03:43 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 560
|
I would do the deal for as new unpolished with box and papers not for those mentioned. Especially if 2007 4-liner as new full set. Likewise for the 16610 over 116610.
|
3 June 2020, 03:44 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Andy
Location: London
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 560
|
I absolutely love the sub C. I think just go with your gut feeling and what you've given the most wear
|
3 June 2020, 04:21 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: United states
Posts: 118
|
Skinny wrist nation.. 5 digit all day long
|
3 June 2020, 04:33 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 160
|
2 liner was my decision
|
3 June 2020, 04:36 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,997
|
I prefer the 4 line 14060, wearing mine now.
But I wouldn’t do that trade.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.