ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Pam 372 47mm or pam 127 47mm | |||
Pam 372 | 60 | 63.83% | |
Pam 127 | 34 | 36.17% | |
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31 August 2013, 11:44 PM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,848
|
I've been asking myself the same thing. It seems inversely proportional to the price tag. The cheapest, 372, is worn most. The more expensive is worn least and the 233 is somewhere in the middle. I don't know if I'm just more comfortable dinging up the 'cheapy' as an everyday watch? I don't even care about scratches or dings when I strap it on. I've not even had the urge to Polywatch the plexi. I wonder if I'd feel the same way if i had a 6152-1?
|
1 September 2013, 12:27 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Jimmy
Location: La Crescenta
Watch: AP Diver
Posts: 792
|
|
1 September 2013, 12:42 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,848
|
|
1 September 2013, 01:42 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: AP Schumacher
Posts: 218
|
127 prices came down due to release of 372
|
1 September 2013, 02:38 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SP-SP-BRAZIL
Posts: 71
|
At the same price I would choose the 372, being cheaper...
|
1 September 2013, 04:00 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,958
|
Quote:
I wear my 127 in rotation without regard for the activity. Occasional home construction projects excluded I guess its all perspective, as a 372 cost considerably more than my first rolex, and i never took the rolex off. If things were relative, the Pams really should be in the 3-4K range... But nobody is listening to me
__________________
|
|
3 September 2013, 05:54 AM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,063
|
No, changed my mind...
... 267!!! Now all I have to do is find one of the six owners and mug him...
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
3 September 2013, 07:49 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
372 for me.
|
8 September 2013, 01:32 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
Nothing beats 372
|
25 September 2013, 02:02 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
127 for me, I can't stand having a watch which doesn't have the second hand, having no date is not a problem, but no seconds hand no way... Even if the 372 is nice, but not for me, of course the price of the 127 is too much in my opinion, I got the 217 which is basically the same price, but the Marina Militare makes the whole difference in my opinion. For the price of the 127 there are many other models that I would prefer to buy...
|
25 September 2013, 02:06 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
I forgot to add that polished case is also not in my taste, brushed all the way for me...
|
25 September 2013, 02:15 PM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Quote:
|
|
25 September 2013, 08:10 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Marc
Location: France
Watch: 116710 & PAM372
Posts: 1,019
|
I like both !!!!
217 is also very nice indeed ! With its "marina militare" writing.
__________________
Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict... |
16 January 2014, 11:52 AM | #44 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,063
|
Well guys, I got one step closer today...
...I reserved this one and now it's time to "sleep on it"...
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
16 January 2014, 02:19 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
The 127 with domed sapphire still rocks. Nothing like it!
|
16 January 2014, 02:52 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Khalid
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,328
|
I'd say 127
__________________
Life is too short, to waste time hating anyone!. Instagram: @PatekCollector |
16 January 2014, 08:01 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 32
|
|
16 January 2014, 09:37 PM | #48 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,322
|
372 for me.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
16 January 2014, 09:37 PM | #49 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 49,178
|
a lot members voted for pam 372? just because of the huge difference of the price?
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
20 January 2014, 08:03 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
Thanh Do, maybe, if you put into comparison a 36 with any other, It will be always the 36, even if the price is so high that I will probably never get one, of course in the question il there was added "and if you have the cash to buy any of the 2", the answers might be different…
|
21 January 2014, 01:11 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: BNE, AUST
Watch: 587 & 5205G
Posts: 35
|
Fiddy wil be my vote
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.