The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 April 2020, 01:47 PM   #5221
Solo118
"TRF" Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Yeah, so here is my opinion, my hope, and what I pray for. I have heard a lot of people (some on this thread) with extremely... Pessimistic views. First, I completely understand this is a very serious situation, and I have no knowledge of medicine or (very much) science. If this thread were about flying fighter jets in combat, then I would be a good knowledge base, but it’s not. Joey Chitwood forgot more about medicine and science before breakfast this morning then I will know in my whole life. Heck, anyone that got a B in high-school science knows more then me; I fully admit. People have posted here some high-level sources as stating there will be 250,000 deaths from this virus. I choose not to believe it. Here are my reasons.

First, Spanish Flu killed (around) 600,000 in the early 1900s in my country (all of this relates to the US). That was over 100 years ago. Medicine has progressed thousands of times in the last 100 years. If I am correct, there were no antibiotics to fight this with, no ventilators, nothing compared to what we have today. Technology and knowledge are incredibly advanced from that time. I have faith our efforts will pay off.

Second, (about) seven thousand American’s deaths have been attributed to Corona. My question, how many of these would have succumbed to another flu? Or a pre-existing condition? The most vulnerable are the elderly, and those that have underlying medical issues. I DO NOT BELITTLE ANYONE’S PASSING, I will pray for all those that left us to Rest In Peace, but strictly speaking numbers, how many of those 7,000 would have succumbed to factors other then Corona? I don’t think anyone will ever know but it has to be a number.

Lastly, our efforts are unprecedented. In my 50+ years on this planet I have never seen anything like this, stay at home, other methods.

So, I don’t believe those numbers of 250,000 deaths. Will I be proved wrong? Very possibly, but until then I’ll continue to have faith and pray those numbers are over-blown. You may agree, or disagree, some on this very thread have called me naive (and worse) and maybe they are correct; but that is what I believe. So, everyone stay safe, take your precautions, and let’s all look forward to when this is a memory.
The population was much lower 100 years ago. Let's say roughly 1.8 Billion vs 7.5 billion today. Percentage-wise, let's just hope it does not reach the percentage that the Spanish flu killed.

Other than that, I am hoping and praying that we get nowhere near the expected numbers of 100-250k deaths. I get your point that the 7,000 lives we lost many of which had pre-existing conditions, but they have been taken early from us for no good reason.
Solo118 is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 01:50 PM   #5222
makak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knappo 1307 View Post
At high risk people need to shelter in, everyone else needs to go back to normal activity. Sheltering in is just prolonging this and spreading it out further in time. The majority of the population who test positive will not be going/needing to stay in the hospital. Whether you do what we're doing now, or go back to normal operation the same amount of people needing hospital beds is gong to be the same. Just my opinion, but then again I'm an idiot...
In response to your last sentence, whilst you could be right, it's just about flattening the curve so not all those who will need hospitalisation, require it at the same time and overload those medical staff and resources. It's not about keeping us from contracting the virus, it's about limiting the numbers that have it at any one time. I could be wrong, I too am an idiot at times
makak is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 01:57 PM   #5223
makak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 136
I read on CNN this morning, and I know you can't believe everything you read, especially when it comes to news reporting. The article stated that front line medical staff were wearing ponchos for protection and didn't have any N95 masks for staff. A few people here have stated they have family members in the medical field. Is this really true?
makak is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 01:57 PM   #5224
DJ39
"TRF" Member
 
DJ39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: South Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 348
Look I am positive and this will end sooner rather than later but the exponential death rate is for real 6k A DAY 3 months into a pandemic is insanely high; unchecked this would have killed millions around the world

This is the REAL DEAL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DJ39 is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 02:04 PM   #5225
gtnator
2024 Pledge Member
 
gtnator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knappo 1307 View Post
At high risk people need to shelter in, everyone else needs to go back to normal activity. Sheltering in is just prolonging this and spreading it out further in time. The majority of the population who test positive will not be going/needing to stay in the hospital. Whether you do what we're doing now, or go back to normal operation the same amount of people needing hospital beds is gong to be the same. Just my opinion, but then again I'm an idiot...

You’re half right and half wrong, which in life/death situations makes it 100% wrong. Yes whether we spike the curve straight up by getting everyone sick all at once, or bend the curve by spreading it out, the SAME number of people will get sick. The number of people below the curve remains the same regardless of the shape. But the problem with spiking the curve is those people that do end up needing an ICU bed or ventilator, will not get one because we will have run out. That’s the problem. But if people could space out when they get sick, those that require ICUs will get them. Make sense???

The other advantage of stretching this out slowly is we may get a vaccine in time to actually REDUCE the numbers below the curve.

These are the two primary reasons for physical and social distancing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gtnator is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 02:05 PM   #5226
Kowaco
"TRF" Member
 
Kowaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Clemson
Watch: G Shock
Posts: 608
Numbers are getting better everyday.

This reminds me of an old cartoon where the guy destroys his whole house to kill a fly and while he’s sitting in the ruins the fly lands on his nose


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Kowaco is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 03:23 PM   #5227
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kowaco View Post
Numbers are getting better everyday.

This reminds me of an old cartoon where the guy destroys his whole house to kill a fly and while he’s sitting in the ruins the fly lands on his nose


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
What “numbers” are getting better?

The number of masks the general public are donning?

These numbers?

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...n-coming-days/
Fleetlord is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 03:44 PM   #5228
gtnator
2024 Pledge Member
 
gtnator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,062
Maybe he means these numbers??? :

“This will be probably the toughest week between this week and next week -- and there will be a lot of death, unfortunately,” the president said at a White House briefing.

Trump’s language echoed New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who said earlier in the day the state has just seven days to prepare for coronavirus apex as it struggles to expand hospital capacity and access to medical equipment.


Trump says 1,000 military personnel deploying to NYC, warns coming week toughest yet in virus fight https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/04/trum...pyToPasteboard


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gtnator is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 03:50 PM   #5229
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtnator View Post
Maybe he means these numbers??? :

“This will be probably the toughest week between this week and next week -- and there will be a lot of death, unfortunately,” the president said at a White House briefing.

Trump’s language echoed New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who said earlier in the day the state has just seven days to prepare for coronavirus apex as it struggles to expand hospital capacity and access to medical equipment.


Trump says 1,000 military personnel deploying to NYC, warns coming week toughest yet in virus fight https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/04/trum...pyToPasteboard


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even Singapore is showing worse numbers...Japan is looking the same way..

I really don't know where the numbers, or specifically what numbers are better..
Fleetlord is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 03:51 PM   #5230
gtnator
2024 Pledge Member
 
gtnator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,062
Totally agree. It’s definitely getting worse. Even our President says so, and that’s not easy for him to say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gtnator is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 04:13 PM   #5231
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knappo 1307 View Post
At high risk people need to shelter in, everyone else needs to go back to normal activity. Sheltering in is just prolonging this and spreading it out further in time. The majority of the population who test positive will not be going/needing to stay in the hospital. Whether you do what we're doing now, or go back to normal operation the same amount of people needing hospital beds is gong to be the same. Just my opinion, but then again I'm an idiot...
I'm not singling your post out as there are many on this thread who share your opinion..

So, the issue is that even non "high risk" individuals will need medical treatment. Quite a few of those in ICU aren't high risk at all. By going back to normal, health care workers are exposed to more cases than they would be by having limitations. This means more personal risk to them, which can be lethal. Why would they want to work under that duress, especially when they are understaffed and don't have enough PPE.

Is that fair to them?

You get to go to a rock concert with 20,000 other people and they get to deal with the illness that propagates afterwards? Virus is still out there and it loves gatherings of people. It's clear that in the weeks following big gatherings, the medical system in the vicinity gets hammered.

So, here is, potentially, a way through this.

There is a waiver attached to a drivers license or other State ID, identifying a person as a "free participant", meaning they can do whatever they want to...but if they test positive for COVID-19 there will be no medical treatment available through the hospital system. The healthcare workers won't be exposed to huge caseloads due to people's decisions. If you want to go out, then go. Get sick?..it's on you.

On the flip side, if you don't sign the waiver, then you must shelter in place with the exception of grocery store runs and doctor / pharmacy. That's pretty much it.

NO restaurants, bars, churches, concerts, No shopping. No flying around. ..etc. Scanning the ID card will either let people in who have agreed to the terms or deny entry to those who don't.

If these individuals test positive, then they can get treatment.

Then when the cases drop out due to herd immunity or a vaccine...the waiver program stops.
Fleetlord is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 04:25 PM   #5232
Andad
2024 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I'm not singling your post out as there are many on this thread who share your opinion..

So, the issue is that even non "high risk" individuals will need medical treatment. Quite a few of those in ICU aren't high risk at all. By going back to normal, health care workers are exposed to more cases than they would be by having limitations. This means more personal risk to them, which can be lethal. Why would they want to work under that duress, especially when they are understaffed and don't have enough PPE.

Is that fair to them?

You get to go to a rock concert with 20,000 other people and they get to deal with the illness that propagates afterwards? Virus is still out there and it loves gatherings of people. It's clear that in the weeks following big gatherings, the medical system in the vicinity gets hammered.

So, here is, potentially, a way through this.

There is a waiver attached to a drivers license or other State ID, identifying a person as a "free participant", meaning they can do whatever they want to...but if they test positive for COVID-19 there will be no medical treatment available through the hospital system. The healthcare workers won't be exposed to huge caseloads due to people's decisions. If you want to go out, then go. Get sick?..it's on you.

On the flip side, if you don't sign the waiver, then you must shelter in place with the exception of grocery store runs and doctor / pharmacy. That's pretty much it.

NO restaurants, bars, churches, concerts, No shopping. No flying around. ..etc. Scanning the ID card will either let people in who have agreed to the terms or deny entry to those who don't.

If these individuals test positive, then they can get treatment.

Then when the cases drop out due to herd immunity or a vaccine...the waiver program stops.
But people out in the community would be?

Could this increase the spread of the virus and the load on the health care workers?
__________________
E

Andad is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 04:33 PM   #5233
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
But people out in the community would be?

This would increase the spread of the virus and the load on the health care workers?
People who sign the waiver can be out in the community...the key is if they contract COVID-19, then they won't be eligible for medical treatment for it, so the the medical system won't have to deal with them. Sounds very harsh, I know...but that way they can do as they please and not burden or endanger medical workers due to their choices...

The people who don't sign the waiver, have to stay home and not mess about. That way they don't co-mingle with the the others who want to get moving on with it.

This way people who want to get moving and grooving can, people who want to steer clear of the virus, can and the medical workers aren't overly exposed.

Just an idea to get people what they want and some movement in the economy. This is just an outline...needs some tweeking for different contingencies...such as people who work directly in the service or retail industry would need some kind of exemption or modification of the waiver. They are essentially the next level of exposure to the public below healthcare workers...
Fleetlord is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 04:40 PM   #5234
michaelodonnell123
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Michael
Location: NJ
Watch: Panerai 112
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patton250 View Post
I never in my lifetime have seen National Guard troops or any troops take anything from any American by force.
The IRS takes your money by force.
michaelodonnell123 is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 04:46 PM   #5235
Andad
2024 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
People who sign the waiver can be out in the community...the key is if they contract COVID-19, then they won't be eligible for medical treatment for it, so the the medical system won't have to deal with them. Sounds very harsh, I know...but that way they can do as they please and not burden or endanger medical workers due to their choices...

The people who don't sign the waiver, have to stay home and not mess about. That way they don't co-mingle with the the others who want to get moving on with it.

This way people who want to get moving and grooving can, people who want to steer clear of the virus, can and the medical workers aren't overly exposed.

Just an idea to get people what they want and some movement in the economy. This is just an outline...needs some tweeking for different contingencies...
People who sign that waiver would not care about the affect on others and would do what they want to do. This is the main problem we have now.
If all the distancing and other requirements were being carried out by everyone things would be very different.
__________________
E

Andad is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 04:55 PM   #5236
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
People who sign that waiver would not care about the affect on others and would do what they want to do. This is the main problem we have now.
If all the distancing and other requirements were being carried out by everyone things would be very different.
That’s correct, but there would no treatment for them if they contract the virus.

I agree with you, btw....I would hope it wouldn’t come to any of that, but as long as the virus is about, there is no normal, so if people really want to choose to do what they want, they can’t ask healthcare workers to bear the brunt of their choices.
Fleetlord is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 05:55 PM   #5237
Moggo
"TRF" Member
 
Moggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Watch: 16610, SD4K, Exp 1
Posts: 1,098
Unbelievable, 3000 people apparently attended Richmond Park in London yesterday in gatherings to sunbathe and barbecue! It annoys me so much that the headlines are then ‘U.K. Ignores Lockdown’!

Most of the U.K. abided by the guidelines, why tar us all with the same brush?! My area was like a ghost town, even the parks. I guess media and facts just don’t mix.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moggo is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 06:34 PM   #5238
Andad
2024 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moggo View Post
Unbelievable, 3000 people apparently attended Richmond Park in London yesterday in gatherings to sunbathe and barbecue! It annoys me so much that the headlines are then ‘U.K. Ignores Lockdown’!

Most of the U.K. abided by the guidelines, why tar us all with the same brush?! My area was like a ghost town, even the parks. I guess media and facts just don’t mix.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I feel sorry for the price that the some will pay for the bad decisions of others.
__________________
E

Andad is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 06:36 PM   #5239
Zakalwe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Sal
Location: London
Posts: 2,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moggo View Post
Unbelievable, 3000 people apparently attended Richmond Park in London yesterday in gatherings to sunbathe and barbecue! It annoys me so much that the headlines are then ‘U.K. Ignores Lockdown’!

Most of the U.K. abided by the guidelines, why tar us all with the same brush?! My area was like a ghost town, even the parks. I guess media and facts just don’t mix.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Outrage sells papers.

I’ve been heartened by the national reaction to the pandemic. Hundreds of thousands volunteering to help the NHS; the vast majority abiding by measures that restrict their freedom purely for the greater good and in the main doing so with good grace. It seems that there really is such a thing as society after all.
__________________
“Never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
Zakalwe is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 06:38 PM   #5240
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
I wonder how many ventilators are in the rural county hospitals where folks still feel safe?
Brew is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 07:24 PM   #5241
Rolexatlast
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeychitwood View Post
Here’s a possibility. Maybe social distancing and other measures to prevent the spread of Covid are working. Not as much fun as a conspiracy theory though, huh?
What I don’t understand is that countries have been quick to lock down their people, yet have been very very reluctant to close down airlines. Earlier this year, we saw China imposing restrictions on movement, with Wuhan locked down completely, yet 40 flights a day were arriving in the UK from China, with no checks other than a vague request to self isolate if unwell. Similarly a few weeks later with Northern Italy - major breakout of cor9na virus, yet the skiing season in full swing with flights across Europe

As if governments wanted to spread it around
Rolexatlast is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 07:28 PM   #5242
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexatlast View Post
What I don’t understand is that countries have been quick to lock down their people, yet have been very very reluctant to close down airlines. Earlier this year, we saw China imposing restrictions on movement, with Wuhan locked down completely, yet 40 flights a day were arriving in the UK from China, with no checks other than a vague request to self isolate if unwell. Similarly a few weeks later with Northern Italy - major breakout of cor9na virus, yet the skiing season in full swing with flights across Europe

As if governments wanted to spread it around
Maybe for the same reason we saw beaches open for spring break here . . . . $$$?
Brew is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 08:08 PM   #5243
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
People who sign the waiver can be out in the community...the key is if they contract COVID-19, then they won't be eligible for medical treatment for it, so the the medical system won't have to deal with them. Sounds very harsh, I know...but that way they can do as they please and not burden or endanger medical workers due to their choices...

The people who don't sign the waiver, have to stay home and not mess about. That way they don't co-mingle with the the others who want to get moving on with it.

This way people who want to get moving and grooving can, people who want to steer clear of the virus, can and the medical workers aren't overly exposed.

Just an idea to get people what they want and some movement in the economy. This is just an outline...needs some tweeking for different contingencies...such as people who work directly in the service or retail industry would need some kind of exemption or modification of the waiver. They are essentially the next level of exposure to the public below healthcare workers...
But the problem is the asymptomatic spread... Just because people sign a waiver to be free to roam, doesn't mean they won't necessarily bring the virus back to others who chose to shelter in place.
gnuyork is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 08:12 PM   #5244
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kowaco View Post
Numbers are getting better everyday.

This reminds me of an old cartoon where the guy destroys his whole house to kill a fly and while he’s sitting in the ruins the fly lands on his nose


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This guy... what numbers are you referring to? Can you please elaborate?
gnuyork is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 08:13 PM   #5245
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolexatlast View Post
yet the skiing season in full swing with flights across Europe

As if governments wanted to spread it around
You may want to check your sources, because both is totally wrong!
bondtoys is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 08:43 PM   #5246
Horosopher
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Chicago; NYC
Posts: 14
Did we hijack those masks intended for Europe? Germany and France now seem to accuse us for "modern piracy".


https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...bidding-demand




Horosopher is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 08:50 PM   #5247
SkyJuice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Land of OZ
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighlandWatch View Post
People laughing at me would be the least of my concerns!
Agree. I chose ignore them. However my encounter just goes to show there are still people who are not taking this seriously!
SkyJuice is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 09:31 PM   #5248
Watch This
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: In your head
Watch: SS YMII
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I'm not singling your post out as there are many on this thread who share your opinion..

So, the issue is that even non "high risk" individuals will need medical treatment. Quite a few of those in ICU aren't high risk at all. By going back to normal, health care workers are exposed to more cases than they would be by having limitations. This means more personal risk to them, which can be lethal. Why would they want to work under that duress, especially when they are understaffed and don't have enough PPE.

Is that fair to them?

You get to go to a rock concert with 20,000 other people and they get to deal with the illness that propagates afterwards? Virus is still out there and it loves gatherings of people. It's clear that in the weeks following big gatherings, the medical system in the vicinity gets hammered.

So, here is, potentially, a way through this.

There is a waiver attached to a drivers license or other State ID, identifying a person as a "free participant", meaning they can do whatever they want to...but if they test positive for COVID-19 there will be no medical treatment available through the hospital system. The healthcare workers won't be exposed to huge caseloads due to people's decisions. If you want to go out, then go. Get sick?..it's on you.

On the flip side, if you don't sign the waiver, then you must shelter in place with the exception of grocery store runs and doctor / pharmacy. That's pretty much it.

NO restaurants, bars, churches, concerts, No shopping. No flying around. ..etc. Scanning the ID card will either let people in who have agreed to the terms or deny entry to those who don't.

If these individuals test positive, then they can get treatment.

Then when the cases drop out due to herd immunity or a vaccine...the waiver program stops.
It must be exhausting to be an expert authority on so very many subjects.
Watch This is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 09:31 PM   #5249
mannyv11
"TRF" Member
 
mannyv11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kowaco View Post
Numbers are getting better everyday.

This reminds me of an old cartoon where the guy destroys his whole house to kill a fly and while he’s sitting in the ruins the fly lands on his nose


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not sure what numbers you are seeing that are getting better.
mannyv11 is offline  
Old 5 April 2020, 09:55 PM   #5250
Moggo
"TRF" Member
 
Moggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Watch: 16610, SD4K, Exp 1
Posts: 1,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by mannyv11 View Post
Not sure what numbers you are seeing that are getting better.

Not sure about the US but deaths are trending down in France, Italy and Spain in the last few days. Long may it continue


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moggo is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.