ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 June 2011, 07:13 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
1998 rolex submariner 2-tone stainless/18kt blue face
Just wondering what to expect to pay for 1 of these in very good condition, with very little flex in the band. No Box or Papers, but purchasing from a respected Used Rolex dealer in Florida. I checked e-bay and they go between $5000-$6000.
I was also wondering if there was anything Unique about the year 1998 since I think Rolex made some detailed changes the following year. Is a 1998 a desirable year? Or is it just as good as any other previous years? Thanks for the help in advance. |
22 June 2011, 08:30 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
1998 is not special. The late A series, mid 2000, is when the SEL bracelet started along with the gold through clasp and also had tritium. There are many of these watches for sale on the second hand market. If it were me I would be looking for anything past that with box and papers. Prices are usually around 6k or so for those.
|
22 June 2011, 10:00 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
bracelets are expensive to replace so make sure that you get an unstretched one.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
23 June 2011, 12:10 AM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
I'm just curious, can you actually tighten up a loose/flexed bracelet or do you replace it out right. So if there are No papers or Box, I should expect to pay $4000 or $4500?? How important are the box and papers anyways. I don't plan to resell it, maybe pass it on to my kids 1 day. |
|
23 June 2011, 12:11 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
|
23 June 2011, 12:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
I have seen blusey go for 4500 range without box and paper. You can prob buy one from the for sale forum here in the 5-6k range easily. Those braceletes are prob at least 1500 a pop, just a guess.
|
23 June 2011, 03:47 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,514
|
i would be looking for a post 2000 model with gold clasp and solid endlinks (93253 bracelet). these are more desirable to most. i would also look to spend as much as you can afford on one... you will get what you pay for with a cheaper one- stretched band, used marks- then the things you cant see- probably in need of a very expensive overhaul inside.. cheap for a reason.
|
23 June 2011, 04:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,688
|
1998
I would be surprised if a 1998 bracelet showed much wear other than scuff marks. I would expect a tt oyster bracelet to look almost new once it's polished a little bit.
|
23 June 2011, 05:02 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Albany NY
Watch: Blue Bezel SubC
Posts: 1,511
|
Quote:
__________________
K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC |
|
23 June 2011, 07:19 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I'd say paying retail around 5K but from and individual about 4-4.5K would be about right.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
24 June 2011, 04:17 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
Thanks for all the comments. I will be acquiring this watch, 1998 submariner 2-tone (No box or papers) from a friend of mine for under $4k. It's in Very good condition and he hardly wore it. I don't know the exact history of the watch, but will find out if it was serviced recently.
|
24 June 2011, 04:19 AM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
Quote:
|
|
24 June 2011, 04:20 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
Nice looking watch. I don't have an extra $1500 to pay for a newer, more recent model.
|
24 June 2011, 04:21 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
|
24 June 2011, 04:22 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Watch: PAM Luminor Destro
Posts: 27
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.