ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 May 2008, 01:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Omega or TAG?
Hi Guys,
I was looking at some Automatic Chronograph watches today. I am not sure what one I want to get. I looked at a TAG Link Automatic Chronograph (Gold and Steel) it was $4200 CAD and an Omega Speedmaster Automatic Chronograph (Gold and Steel) it was 5500 CAD. The features seem to be the same. Should I pay the extra $1300? and if so why? I would like to get a Rolex Daytona but I don't want to blow that much cash right now. Thanks, Eric |
15 May 2008, 01:57 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Vegas, baby!
Watch: one from ShopNBC!
Posts: 436
|
I would get the Omega, because I think the fit and finish is a bit better.But more importantly, I think the Omega looks nicer. Which one do you like better?
__________________
SeaDweller "Z" Yachtmaster "Z" Oyster Perpetual "M" |
15 May 2008, 02:03 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
Do a search because there are plenty of these threads around.
OMEGA is generally considered to be the more reputable manufacturer, and with its recent in-house movements, can be considered a true manufacturer. TAG is a brand.
__________________
|
15 May 2008, 02:56 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Greg
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Watch: Polar Club Founder
Posts: 434
|
I am a big Omega fan. Just buy holding the two watches, the Omega's always talk back to me. The braclets on the Omegas also seem to be a little more heavy duty. You should be able to get 25% OFF on either brands. Check around...
__________________
Rolex Explorer II ~Polar Dial Original Founder Rolex Sub C 116610 Rolex YM 116610 Rolex DJ TOG 116264 Rolex DJ Roman 126200 |
15 May 2008, 02:58 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: So. California
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 382
|
INMO, the best move is to go with Omega. However, for roughly the same amount of money you could get a Rolex Explorer?!? Not a bad watch :)
|
15 May 2008, 04:45 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Petros
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 370
|
Hi there Eric!
Comparing the companies you mentioned, I'd choose Omega w/o any further thought!!! History alone speaks volumes for Omega! Quality-wise I'd also pick Omega... It is a company still much closer to its own roots than TAG! My reasons for choosing Omega are far beyond the scope of this reply, so I'll leave it at that... -->But: Quote:
wait a bit. I understand your point about the cash... but there is one basic thought you might consider: when it comes to automatic chronographs of "today's" production, there is (almost) no finer chronograph than the Daytona!!!! (well, my 2c again) The Rolex 4130 is the most sturdy & well constructed automatic chronograph movement out there... Not even the coveted El Primero (or the Rolex 4030) comes close to it in regards of sheer technical & horological quality. Rolex gave birth to an absolute winner with their 4130 that powers the Daytonas from 2000 onwards! I know that the older 4030 - El Primero based - Daytonas are valued higher as being more collectible, but when it comes to sheer technical achievements, the new - and original - 4130 is unbeatable! (IMHO) For as much as I love the Speedy (and you all know by now that I do ) for example, I'd go as far as this: hypothetically, if NASA were to conduct new tests and the entries would be automatic chronographs, the 4130 would win! Hands down & flat out!!!!! Period!!!! (So now you all know how much I love the 4130 too... ) When it comes to SS (the 116520), we all know what it takes to get a Daytona at (or at near) list price... So, maybe a TT speaks to you as well? Or just try to get yourself on one of the lists at your AD... That way, you'll have time with the cash as well... Well... what I simply mean with my (much too "wordy") reply above is this: if it is the Daytona that speaks to you, then don't spend parts of the money a Daytona would cost you on a watch that just wouldn't be 100% to you. It'd be better to wait a bit and save the money... so, in the end you'll get the watch that you like the most... and the wait will have been worth it all the way! Just my (many) 2c... B/R Petros
__________________
This is gold, Mr. Bond. All my life I've admired its color, its brilliance, its divine heaviness. I welcome any enterprise that will increase my stock...which is considerable! |
|
15 May 2008, 07:38 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Watch: Omega Speedmaster
Posts: 467
|
|
15 May 2008, 08:15 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 105
|
Totally agree with applebook. Tag is a brand. A very strong brand here in Asia. Tag plan to launch their new mobile phone watch. Maybe later Tag will be the brand for anything. You buy Tag for the life style and buy Omega for a real watch. Depend on what you need and your personality.
|
15 May 2008, 09:34 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
It is simply not possible to compare these two brands!
Omega Tag
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual GMT-Master ll Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Omega Seamaster Professional Chronograph |
15 May 2008, 10:16 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,554
|
I'm not familiar with Tag, but I love my three Omegas. Tag just seems like a mall watch to me. I know they have a following, but I wouldn't compare them with an Omega.
|
15 May 2008, 10:37 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 35,799
|
Overall Omega is the better brand. Tag Heuer went "mall" in the 80's and early 90's but has recently come back with great designs an innovations. Both have classic references with rich history. Omega seems more "steak" and Tag Heuer seems more "sizzle".
Although I love the Speedmaster my favorite from both brands in the "Steve McQueen" Monaco. dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
15 May 2008, 11:55 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Thanks for all your feedback, I am leading towords the Omega Speedmaster (but I still thinking about Rolex Daytona:).
|
15 May 2008, 11:58 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Hi Petros,
I only seen a Daytona TT on there website. How much is a Daytona SS? Thanks, Eric Quote:
|
|
16 May 2008, 01:02 AM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,082
|
Omega is recognized throughout the world and is only second to Rolex for a "Dream Watch".
Tag is further down the list but ranks higher in the USA (probably right after Omega) than other countries; probably because of the US athletes they get as ambassadors such as Tiger Woods. The Heuer watch company has a long history of achievements including micro timer stop watches, the first quarts chronograph, and was named as the official timekeeper for Formula One Racing throughout the 70's. TAG and Heuer joined in 1985 to form TAG-Heuer and is recognized for association with skiing, auto racing, golf, etc.. Quite a loyal following. TAG is not a bad watch at all so get the one you want to wear without fear, but as for me....I would get the Omega..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
16 May 2008, 01:11 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Quote:
A. It's a Rolex B. It's a coveted luxury accessory, known by many outside the WIS community as a must-have, hard-to-find watch. Don't get me wrong, the Daytona is a great watch, but for my money, I would buy the Speedmaster which also has a rich history in horology, and, IMO, looks better. That's just me. You'll have enough money left over for a Submariner or GMT! If I was to start my watch collection all over again, it would probably look like one of these: 1. White dial DD Speedmaster, SS Submariner, TT GMT2C (or TT DJ) 2. White dial DD Speedmaster, Bluesy, SS GMT2C You can see I'm not even discussing TAG Heuer here, as it's not even comparable to the other two, IMO.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
|
16 May 2008, 01:27 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 92
|
While I've got 2 Tags and 2 Omegas right now, I'd have to agree with everybody else....Omega.
|
16 May 2008, 02:20 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Personally, I prefer the gold/steel Speedmasters over the Daytona.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
16 May 2008, 02:36 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: *
Posts: 10,196
|
Two totally leagues, in my opinion. I'd go Omega all the way
__________________
Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there |
16 May 2008, 02:57 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NoVa
Posts: 91
|
I'd go Omega and go back in a few weeks and get the Tag. lol!
|
16 May 2008, 04:19 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Domingo
Location: Dublin, CA
Watch: TT GMT-Master IIc
Posts: 40
|
I'd go for the Omega Speedmaster. I have an older Tag Link, and IMO the link series seems trendy, but still nice watches.
|
16 May 2008, 04:26 AM | #21 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Some of the new TAGs are very nice to look at with some great functional features....but if I were to buy brand new, OMEGA would be the way to go.
How the hell can you ever go wrong with ANY Omega?
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
16 May 2008, 05:47 AM | #22 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Petros
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
Well... all in all... that's what I wanted to say too... my complicated self just wrote it... err... more complicated!!! Yessss!!! x2 Quote:
for some time now... some people will say that it was never there in the first place... but I do remember that it was up... just a week or so prior to this year's Baselworld... In any case, the 2008 list price of the SS Daytona is $ 9,200, but as David (DJS) has pointed out, the 116520 may also be regarded as "over-hyped". Hype or no hype, it still is a great chronograph. And this out of the mouth (keyboard that is) of a true Omega lover! So in MHO, there's still nothing comes close to a classic Speedmaster, especially when it comes to history, heritage and horological importance! So, to sum it all up (in a nice and "Petros-like" complicated manner ), I'd say this: Regarding your first "dilemma": Omega all the way!!!!! Regarding your 2nd "dilemma" (that is, Daytona or not): if the Daytona speaks to you louder than any other watch, you might want to delay your purchase of a different watch (for as great a watch an Omega is), and go for the one that you like the most. If in the end it is not an Omega but the Daytona... well... then you should try to get one, instead of spending parts of its cost on another watch that would only be 75% for you... Well... did I express myself complicated enough????? & all the best Petros
__________________
This is gold, Mr. Bond. All my life I've admired its color, its brilliance, its divine heaviness. I welcome any enterprise that will increase my stock...which is considerable! |
||
16 May 2008, 07:07 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
I just went to vist my AD and the Daytona SS is back ordered and if I want one there is a 3 year delay. So I will have to hold off on the Daytona SS.
I looked at the speedmaster omega again. I think it is this model323.21.40.40.01.001. It is a real nice watch. Thanks, Eric Quote:
|
|
16 May 2008, 08:38 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
That Speedmaster model will never compete with the Daytona in accuracy or performance. You may luck out with a good one, but its movement is not in the same league as the Rolex.
When we're referring to the historic value of the Speedmaster, we're referring to the Moon watch, and to a lesser extent the Lemania day-date models, not the other models. Consider the Broad Arrow Speedmasters if you want something that can compete with the Daytona.
__________________
|
16 May 2008, 04:16 PM | #25 | |||||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Petros
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
Said automatic Speedmaster uses the cal. 1164, and that is based on the Valjoux (now ETA) 7750. The 7750 is a good workhorse, but that's just about it. It is definitely not even close to being in the same league as the 4130 of the Daytona. Quote:
Eric, I was under the impression that you were looking at a variation of the Moon Watch and not any of the other models... The "true" Speedmaster Moon Watch would be a 105.012 or a 145.012 (both with cal. 321)(so they are "vintage" and you'd need to look for them in the 2nd-hand-market) or the 145.022 with the cal. 861 (also "vintage"). It is in production today under the model#: 3570.50.00 You can find it here: Speedy Pro 3570.50.00 @ omega That is today's classic & historic Speedy...! Quote:
Look at the # 321.10.42.50.01.001 Gorgeous, isn't it? You can find it here: BR Black dial @ omega Quote:
like doing this: Quote:
The real Speedmaster Professional manual wind # 3570.50.00 is the way to go, when we talk about current production Speedys... Or else, go vintage & all the best Petros
__________________
This is gold, Mr. Bond. All my life I've admired its color, its brilliance, its divine heaviness. I welcome any enterprise that will increase my stock...which is considerable! |
|||||
19 May 2008, 12:50 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
The Omega is a much better watch imho. As many have said previously, Omega has and excellent history as a watch brand while Tag much less so. While I don't think anyone here would say a Tag wouldn't be an OK watch to own, but in comparison, Omega is much nicer.
|
19 May 2008, 02:30 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Greg
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Watch: Polar Club Founder
Posts: 434
|
The last TAG I owned ended up being ripped out my wrist and went flying against a brick wall when I got into a scuffle at a bar in College. It shattered into pieces... It was an inexpensive 3000 model, though. That was that last TAG I bought for myself.
I did recently purchase a TAG Diamond Chrono Links (Uma Thurman) for my wife. She wanted diamonds and didn't like the Omega Constilation or Rolex DJ with diamonds. She thought they were to old lady looking... she's only 24.
__________________
Rolex Explorer II ~Polar Dial Original Founder Rolex Sub C 116610 Rolex YM 116610 Rolex DJ TOG 116264 Rolex DJ Roman 126200 |
3 June 2008, 08:34 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Barry
Location: Scotland
Watch: Omega Seamaster
Posts: 1
|
Hi, Had two tag before but sold them to get me seamaster and just got me new speedmaster broadarrow, far superiour watch maker
|
3 June 2008, 09:03 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 60
|
Sorry, just found this thread. I was just comparing the TAGs and Omegas myself. I'm thinking Speedmaster all the way. Just did a quick search, but lots of them are 20% to 30% off at Amazon.
|
3 June 2008, 09:42 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 8,986
|
When it comes between those two brands without a doubt it has to be Omega. I own one, it is not my favourite brand (of course Rolex is) but in comparison I feel you may like the Omega better so take the advice of all those who suggested it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.