ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 September 2018, 05:44 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: GB
Posts: 296
|
Ideal Movement to Case proportions
I am not a WIS and thus quite perplexed when many bemoan the size of many of PP calibres to the diameter of the case size. In particular the 5524 and 5196 and sometimes even 5327. I was wondering if there is some sort of "golden rule" or is it just watch snobbery? I thought I should compare some models based on case and size of movement and here is what I discovered:
5524 : 42 mm x 31 mm (324) = 74% 5327 : 39 mm x 27.5 mm (240Q) = 70.5% 5196P: 37 mm x 21.9 mm (215PS) = 59% 5170 : 39.4 mm x 29.6 mm = 75% Considering PP designed a new movement for the 5170 it would stand to reason that 75% would seem to be the magic number. Why is the 5524 criticized so much for a case size of similar proportions? In fact AP actually increased the size of the movement (5134) to accommodate the larger 41 mm diameter of the RO Perpetual (70%) and if they increased the size and only got to 70% it proves somebody elses aesthetic is different. The AP Diver is even worse at 42 mm case and 26.6 mm movement (63%) and I don't here as many AP owners bemoan the size of movements versus PP. Then we have the PP fan favourites; 5070 : 42 mm x 27.5 mm (CH 27-70) = 65% 5970 : 40 mm x 27.5 mm (310) = 68% We tend to overlook the movement sizes in the above based purely on nostalgia knowing full well the movements were designed for a case that was some 4 mm smaller (76.38%)in the case of the 5970 and 6 mm for the 5070. The Voutuilainen Vingt 8 is a 39 mm x 30 mm = 76.9% proportion. Maybe we just find a reason to criticize a watch no matter how beautiful it is... or are their magic proportions that true WIS look out for? |
25 September 2018, 05:49 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,837
|
Wow.
And I just I thought the script on some sub dials is too big.
__________________
E |
25 September 2018, 06:37 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: GB
Posts: 296
|
|
25 September 2018, 11:15 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England
Watch: 5990
Posts: 3,341
|
Quote:
|
|
25 September 2018, 11:15 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,875
|
Not the IWC Portuguese and not the 5196
__________________
|
26 September 2018, 07:27 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: GB
Posts: 296
|
RussW you are correct it debuted in the 7071 and then 5170
|
26 September 2018, 07:31 PM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,837
|
Could just be the target age group?
__________________
E |
26 September 2018, 07:33 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
|
26 September 2018, 08:20 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: GB
Posts: 296
|
|
26 September 2018, 08:28 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,837
|
No need to get personal thank you.
__________________
E |
27 September 2018, 02:33 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
I am more focused on the proportion of dial to case.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.