The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 April 2021, 02:06 AM   #61
Stan Cooper
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Stan Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Stan Cooper
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 2,704
I have no experience with Glidelock, but it looks pretty bulky for what it does. I have an Easylink clasp on my DJ Turn-O-Graph bracelet and it works well for me.
__________________
♛16710 GMT-Master II, ♛1915 Rolex WW1 Trench Watch, Zelos Thresher 500m GMT Meteorite, Zelos Swordfish 40 200m Ti Blood Moon Meteorite, Hamilton Pilot Chronograph, Ball Roadmaster Pilot GMT COSC Chronometer, Zelos Mako 300M True GMT Meteorite
It's weird being the same age as old people.

- Stan
Stan Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 03:29 AM   #62
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
If you need something to go over a dive suit like the glide lock was intended, then that’s the obvious choice.

When I had my Sub I always messed around with the glidelock, constantly looking for that “perfect” fit. It was nice to have, but did I need it…not really, not to that variance in change at least.

Now that all I have is the easy link on my BLRO, I more or less set it and forget it…I might open up the clasp in the summer and close it back in the winter but there is much less fiddling. I also very much prefer how small the easy link is vs the glidelock, think it feels a lot better on the wrist.
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 06:04 AM   #63
KBM
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,386
The glidelock is much more precise and allows for a perfect fit every time. Can't say the say for the easy link, imo.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 06:29 AM   #64
ap1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,029
No way, GL
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 06:42 AM   #65
London88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: London
Posts: 87
With the easy link sometimes I'm not sure I even got it work until I put the watch back on and can feel the bracelet has been shortened.

With the glide lock the visual confirmation is reassuring to me.
London88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 06:45 AM   #66
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by London88 View Post
With the easy link sometimes I'm not sure I even got it work until I put the watch back on and can feel the bracelet has been shortened.

With the glide lock the visual confirmation is reassuring to me.
It should have a pretty satisfying snap into place.
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 07:07 AM   #67
dontbeshort
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: Henri
Location: @ the golf club
Watch: LN LV BLRO BLNR
Posts: 274
Easy lock is great and glide link is marginally similar
dontbeshort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 07:10 AM   #68
London88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: London
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSolution View Post
It should have a pretty satisfying snap into place.
This is true. I do await the snap. However, I can't often tell if I've merely just re-snapped the link back into the same position it was. But I'm sure I'm in the minority here :).
London88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 07:13 AM   #69
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,485
I can't find a good fit with my Daytona easylink. It's too loose and if I adjust the clasp in one its' too tight. If I add another link and adjust the clasp either way it's too tight or too loose.
I much prefer the Glider on my Sub, I can get a perfect fit.
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 09:36 AM   #70
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,158
I like my EZ link. It's more comfortable I guess im lucky as the 5mm difference works just the way it's supposed to for me. Glidelock is too long and heavy. If it could be shortened some that might make it better. I can't speak for folks who actually use it over a dive suit. I would imagine it's perfect for it's real intention.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 09:39 AM   #71
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,456
In what universe can someone prefer the easy link over glidelock? It is useless and I LOVE my explorer.

Unless you need to wear it over a shirt, 5mm is too much. If it is humid and my watch gets tight I need barely one adjustment on the SubC. When I pop open the easy link it falls literally inches down my wrist. Literally useless.

I am not triggered easily! But I can’t imagine using my easy link for anything, let along preferring it to glidelock.
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 11:53 AM   #72
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikrnic View Post
I like my EZ link. It's more comfortable I guess im lucky as the 5mm difference works just the way it's supposed to for me. Glidelock is too long and heavy. If it could be shortened some that might make it better. I can't speak for folks who actually use it over a dive suit. I would imagine it's perfect for it's real intention.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
The abbreviated Glidelock will eventually replace the EasyLink. Fair to say 3 versions of the Glidelock now. DSSD, Sub/SD, and the newer Abbreviated GL. That latter from my experience, is indistinguishable from the EasyLink on the wrist. It would probably fit exactly what you're looking for.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 11:55 AM   #73
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brny11 View Post
In what universe can someone prefer the easy link over glidelock? It is useless and I LOVE my explorer.

Unless you need to wear it over a shirt, 5mm is too much. If it is humid and my watch gets tight I need barely one adjustment on the SubC. When I pop open the easy link it falls literally inches down my wrist. Literally useless.

I am not triggered easily! But I can’t imagine using my easy link for anything, let along preferring it to glidelock.
Lol I agree about the 5mm adjustment. It's way too large of an incremental adjustment. I never use the actual EasyLink on my watches with it. Should be 2 notches at min spaced 2.5mm apart.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 12:05 PM   #74
cvo
"TRF" Member
 
cvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: C Vo
Location: Georgia
Watch: 117610LN 116610LN
Posts: 1,012
Glidelock all the way.
cvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 12:39 PM   #75
Rori
"TRF" Member
 
Rori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Middle East
Watch: Rolex / Tudor
Posts: 3,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSolution View Post
I train hard 6 days a week and I’m always Bulking/cutting my weight so I know how you feel. The easy link is much more of a better setting it’s a perfect click one way or the other - definitely recommend if you haven’t owned one.

Good to know. Thank you. To Rolex boutique soon :-)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.
Rori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 12:56 PM   #76
toneafficianado
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
toneafficianado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,201
I way prefer the EZ and I have owned both. It’s a shorter less cumbersome clasp too and can be adjusted fast without looking. Wish I could put one on my old “ tuna can “ bracelet on my 14060M
All watches need adjustable clasps in my opinion.
What is the Abbreviated Glidelock?
I hadn’t heard of that till reading this post.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
toneafficianado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2021, 11:56 PM   #77
jaisonline
2024 Pledge Member
 
jaisonline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
Too bad Rolex doesn’t make a GlideLock clasp close to the EasyLink size for non-dive models
jaisonline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 01:15 AM   #78
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by toneafficianado View Post
I way prefer the EZ and I have owned both. It’s a shorter less cumbersome clasp too and can be adjusted fast without looking. Wish I could put one on my old “ tuna can “ bracelet on my 14060M
All watches need adjustable clasps in my opinion.
What is the Abbreviated Glidelock?
I hadn’t heard of that till reading this post.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaisonline View Post
Too bad Rolex doesn’t make a GlideLock clasp close to the EasyLink size for non-dive models

First introduced on the YM42. More than likely coming to other models in the future unless negative feedback.

https://www.rolex.com/watches/yacht-...6659-0002.html
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 01:16 AM   #79
JodyHighroller
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by 904VT View Post
First introduced on the YM42. More than likely coming to other models in the future unless negative feedback.

https://www.rolex.com/watches/yacht-...6659-0002.html
Thank you. I’ve lost count on providing proof on here how Rolex makes a mini glide lock.
JodyHighroller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 01:26 AM   #80
Daytonaboy1977
"TRF" Member
 
Daytonaboy1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Uk
Watch: Various
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSolution View Post
My two goto watches atm are a sky dweller and a sea dweller.

For adjustment purposes I’ve come to the conclusion I prefer the easy link, seems to be just the right amount and one simple click out and it’s perfect either way.

I find myself fiddling with the glide lock a little too much I think just because the option is there and it is also a little more fiddly to get it onto the actual notch you want.

Both are great just a personal preference.

I have heard the deep sea glide lock works a little differently but I’ve not owned one myself.
Love the glidelock on my LV, always get a perfect fit after a little fiddling about. The easy link is great but doesn't quite match up to the glidelock in my opinion. I always find its in-between fits somehow.
Daytonaboy1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 08:48 AM   #81
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by JodyHighroller View Post
Thank you. I’ve lost count on providing proof on here how Rolex makes a mini glide lock.
It's interesting how unknown it still is. I guess the WG YM42 isn't a mainstream release though.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 08:57 AM   #82
GMT Aviator
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GMT Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,270
Glidelock is great apart from the size of the clasp cover. It’s just too big, except for the newer version on the YM42. That’s just perfect.

Easylink is quick, simple and effective. It’s satisfactory for its purpose.
GMT Aviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 12:12 PM   #83
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMT Aviator View Post
Glidelock is great apart from the size of the clasp cover. It’s just too big, except for the newer version on the YM42. That’s just perfect.

Easylink is quick, simple and effective. It’s satisfactory for its purpose.
Agreed about the smaller being great, though I don't mind the larger on the dive watches. Unless you're a diver and need a ton of extension to go over a dive suit, the smaller version imo really is perfect. Can't wait to see it come to the GMT Master and Daytona especially. Could be nice on the Milgauss too with its thicker case back. Also, would be nice if Rolex moved the DSSD GlideLock to the SD43 along with the titanium case back. A few moves imo that can really increase the comfort and usability of the sports watches.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 12:16 PM   #84
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
glidelock, esp the smaller one on the YM40 OF.
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 April 2021, 12:20 PM   #85
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by JodyHighroller View Post
Thank you. I’ve lost count on providing proof on here how Rolex makes a mini glide lock.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 May 2021, 10:28 PM   #86
jaisonline
2024 Pledge Member
 
jaisonline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by 904VT View Post
It's interesting how unknown it still is. I guess the WG YM42 isn't a mainstream release though.

Exactly. Rolex doesn’t advertise it being a different glide lock (don’t blame them) & I haven’t read about the “mini” clasp in many WG YM42 reviews.
jaisonline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 May 2021, 10:43 PM   #87
JSol1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New England
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaisonline View Post
Exactly. Rolex doesn’t advertise it being a different glide lock (don’t blame them) & I haven’t read about the “mini” clasp in many WG YM42 reviews.
It’s also on the 12 series Everose YM OF...
JSol1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.