ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2016, 02:04 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
No Oysterflex??????
Just wondering if anyone other than me was surprised about this. I know Rolex spent a lot developing this and to only offer it on 1 model (2 sizes)???? It's very comfortable and I was hoping to see it on something else I guess.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 March 2016, 02:07 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: U.K
Posts: 677
|
I'm with you on this, very suppressed by the lack of oyster flex.
__________________
Rolex/Tudor/AP/VC/Panerai |
17 March 2016, 02:12 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Abram
Location: NorCal
Watch: Rolex & Patek
Posts: 513
|
Yeah--very disappointed we didn't get to see an expansion of the oysterflex. I was sure it was going to happen. Rolex typically moves pretty slow but I think this was highly anticipated. it's possibly due to production concerns--not enough capacity or a combination of low yields that are preventing larger scale production. Pure speculation. Could also be they didn't want to compete with sales from the new ceramic Daytona. Maybe next year...
|
17 March 2016, 02:14 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: U.K
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex/Tudor/AP/VC/Panerai |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.