|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2016, 03:04 AM
|
#1 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,499
|
wait! what? isn't the daytona still a 39mm woman's watch with no date?
     just kidding around....it's great to see all the daytona excitement and not a SINGLE post (yet) about wishing for a 42mm butch daytona with date function.  
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:05 AM
|
#2 | |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,347
|
Quote:
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:05 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
hey hey hey lay off my 6.75 inch wrists man
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:08 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Rich
Location: Tampa
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 318
|
I wish they made it in 60mm
__________________
 "The world breaks everyone, and afterward, many are strong at the broken places." Ernest Hemingway Talent is a chisel, but hard work and effort is the hammer. God puts the chisel in your hand but expects you to pick up the hammer and swing... |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:09 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Watch: Yachtmaster & SubC
Posts: 641
|
You mean 38.5 mm ! I'll have a big smile on my face when I wear that white dial "women's" watch.
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:10 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
|
Perfect size for me at 40mm and i dont need a date ,,, i have a phone, a computer, emails, and and and ... date = clutter for me. (but to each their own)
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:12 AM
|
#7 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
|
Quote:
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a |
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:15 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,060
|
40mm is great HOWEVER would have been nice to use the Paul Newman Exotic Dial and cut off the damn crown guards
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:16 AM
|
#9 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,390
|
Ha. This one will be hot for a - very - long time. No complains on size here. But I do think the 116520 models look more chic and less sporty.
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:17 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Omega calls the updated 39.5mm Planet Ocean a ladies watch, and calls the updated, now 43.5mm Planet Ocean a gents watch. While Rolex calls the 40mm (as advertised) Daytona a gents watch. As a guy cursed with thin wrists, I'd like to think Omega's wrong and Rolex's right
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:18 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Maine
Watch: Rolex 116660
Posts: 1,602
|
wait! what? isn't the daytona still a 39mm woman's watch with no date?
Disregard
__________________
Rolex 116660 Ball EM2 Diver Casio G-Shock |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2016, 03:19 AM
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
I am so happy they didn't go 42mm. 40mm is the perfect size IMO. Well done by Rolex with the Daytona
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
