The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 December 2018, 10:22 AM   #91
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,341
Rolex will never beg anyone to buy a watch. Those days, if ever existent are long gone. They can easily control supply/production to maintain brand value. They have already started to do that regardless of the current economic climate. Additionally, no one knows for certain what is in store for the economy in the future.
GoingPlaces is offline  
Old 7 December 2018, 10:23 AM   #92
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager135 View Post
You know none of that for a fact. The middle class shrinking is a fact. Proven many times over. It has been happening for many years now prior to the current "shortage." Neither Rolex nor you knows anything about the tax brackets of the people purchasing their product. No one even knows how many watches Rolex actually makes. We make estimations. This idea that a sizeable portion of people in the US are floating on this economic bubble and that is directly tied to the availability of Rolex watches is tenuous at best. Getting a Rolex watch is only becoming a more difficult endeavor for most and this has been happening for a lot longer than 2 years.

We may need to agree to disagree here.
Correct, you know none of this as fact either. Let’s agree to disagree.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 7 December 2018, 10:56 AM   #93
Fort Rolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 586
I think the Daytona, SkyD, SS BLRO will still be impossible regardless of downturn. Would be more felt in the other lines imo
Fort Rolex is offline  
Old 7 December 2018, 12:50 PM   #94
Ichiran
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ichiran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Dotonbori
Watch: Mostly blue dials
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
I see it as apples to apples, because all authentic Rolexes in the market originate from ADs. If ADs don't get stock, ultimately that means the grays don't get stock. If grays have stock, that means ADs had it first. Even if it's coming from a different country, it still shows availability globally. If Rolex is shorting US ADs of stock in order to send it to different markets, that would explain a "shortage" domestically, but it doesn't mean Rolex is reducing supply globally to spike demand.

Additionally, we saw publication of Rolex UK's revenue for 2017, and it was at an all-time high, indicating there is no lack of sales. If supply were substantially down, why would sales be up? It can't all be Datejusts.
Agreed.
Ichiran is offline  
Old 7 December 2018, 01:26 PM   #95
SBC1986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 146
I am surprised that so many on the forum don't realize the economy goes up and down. And it has been going up for a very long time so what do they say about things that go up...?

Contrary to popular belief luxury goods do get hit in recessions; but most luxury companies are clever enough, and have enough cash stocked, to hold back supply so that they still seem in demand. Luxury type items are often hit in price point not volume. People go on vacation but cheaper vacations, they eat out but their check average drops because they bring their own wine. They buy Christmas gifts but don't go crazy. etc...

Rolex wont go under but gray sellers (who are currently hoarding stock and speculating), and small ADs will suffer. And maybe Rolex will go back to treating their customers well.

Also, many people who 'invested' in watches will have a bit of an awakening.
SBC1986 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 02:42 AM   #96
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Those who “invested” in stocks too. Under that set of circumstances Rolex will probably hold up their value just as good as Gold.
ALF61 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 02:49 AM   #97
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALF61 View Post
Those who “invested” in stocks too. Under that set of circumstances Rolex will probably hold up their value just as good as Gold.
Stocks go up and down but for those who have invested correctly, those values have far surpassed the potential increased financial value of a Rolex.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 02:59 AM   #98
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBAY View Post
Stocks go up and down but for those who have invested correctly, those values have far surpassed the potential increased financial value of a Rolex.
If you have a crash like 2008 everything will halve in value and there will be no way you will say correctly invested at current levels, which is where we are at right now no matter what. Your 10K Rolex will hold its value better than any stock I am certain. A valuable good is better than any overpriced self fed paper stock, especially in companies that do not hold tangible assets.
ALF61 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 03:03 AM   #99
Sublovin
"TRF" Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
My portfolio and my job have nothing to do with the price or availability of high end luxury jewelry.

And who will AD's be "begging"? Those who have no money? Your premise is deeply flawed.
That’s great for you, but to think luxury goods are not affected by the economy is foolish at best.
Sublovin is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 03:06 AM   #100
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALF61 View Post
If you have a crash like 2008 everything will halve in value and there will be no way you will say correctly invested at current levels, which is where we are at right now no matter what. Your 10K Rolex will hold its value better than any stock I am certain. A valuable good is better than any overpriced self fed paper stock, especially in companies that do not hold tangible assets.
It may have halved in 2008 but it’s multiplied since.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 03:06 AM   #101
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Icon15

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublovin View Post
That’s great for you, but to think luxury goods are not affected by the economy is foolish at best.
What he said
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 03:09 AM   #102
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBAY View Post
It may have halved in 2008 but it’s multiplied since.

OK, hold on to your Rolex, it has multiplied as well, only not as much.
ALF61 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 03:12 AM   #103
ROLMARINER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublovin View Post
That’s great for you, but to think luxury goods are not affected by the economy is foolish at best.
The correct point of view is that some luxury goods are affected by the economy, not all.

Would a Rolex Datejust 41 with an MSRP of $9,500 currently from greys at $9,000 be offered at MSRP plus a 15% discount? Yes.

Would a Rolex BLRO with an MSRP of $9,050 currently from greys at $18,000 be offered below that or down to MSRP? No.

While most Rolex models would see discounts if the economy slips, the demand for certain Rolex references will remain high because the supply will remain low and there are plenty of rich people who don't blink at a $18,000 ask.
ROLMARINER is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 03:15 AM   #104
Calatrava r
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 10,582
I think the current demand for Rolex steel sports is driven by an artificial shortage of supply by Rolex to respond to the very soft watch market we are in. (Patek is doing the same thing on all their models) Rather than have their watches discounted they are reducing supplies. The soft watch market is really driven by the never ending flow of people out of watches into connected devices not by what the economy does at this point unlike the 2008 downturn.
Calatrava r is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:05 AM   #105
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLMARINER View Post
The correct point of view is that some luxury goods are affected by the economy, not all.

Would a Rolex Datejust 41 with an MSRP of $9,500 currently from greys at $9,000 be offered at MSRP plus a 15% discount? Yes.

Would a Rolex BLRO with an MSRP of $9,050 currently from greys at $18,000 be offered below that or down to MSRP? No.

While most Rolex models would see discounts if the economy slips, the demand for certain Rolex references will remain high because the supply will remain low and there are plenty of rich people who don't blink at a $18,000 ask.
The economy hasn’t dipped yet. If it does, the BLRO certainly won’t be going for 18k and the rich folks will be able to purchase it at an AD for MSRP or a grey for Much less than 18k.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:06 AM   #106
ROLMARINER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calatrava r View Post
I think the current demand for Rolex steel sports is driven by an artificial shortage of supply by Rolex to respond to the very soft watch market we are in. (Patek is doing the same thing on all their models) Rather than have their watches discounted they are reducing supplies. The soft watch market is really driven by the never ending flow of people out of watches into connected devices not by what the economy does at this point unlike the 2008 downturn.
This. Required reading.
ROLMARINER is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:07 AM   #107
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALF61 View Post
OK, hold on to your Rolex, it has multiplied as well, only not as much.
Fortunately, I think you and I both purchase Rolex for the love, not the investment.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:18 AM   #108
ROLMARINER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBAY View Post
The economy hasn’t dipped yet. If it does, the BLRO certainly won’t be going for 18k and the rich folks will be able to purchase it at an AD for MSRP or a grey for Much less than 18k.
Nope.

You keep painting with a very broad brush, as if all Rolex owners are the same when we're not. Some of us are 70 and retired with substantial savings, some of us are 55 and trendy multi-millionaires, some of us are 40 and pinched by college savings, some of us are 30 and saving for a house, and some of us are 25 and just starting our careers.

Perhaps you identify with some of the less-well-off groups and view the world through that lens. What I can tell you is that the market could dip 50% tomorrow and it wouldn't make me think twice about dropping $18K on a Rolex I really wanted. And I'm not alone. Rolex has sold 20,000,000 watches in the past 20 years and I'm guessing another 10,000,000 were bought through the pre-owned market. That's a lot of Rolexes out there and a lot of owners who would gobble up the paltry 3,000 BLRO's being produced each year.

In a recession, Rolex will cut BLRO production and the wealthy $18K crowd won't be affected by any market dip. I can't say it any clearer than that.
ROLMARINER is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:20 AM   #109
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBAY View Post
Fortunately, I think you and I both purchase Rolex for the love, not the investment.

ALF61 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:25 AM   #110
dubins930
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
dubins930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 794
This is some of the most asinine nonsense I’ve ever seen on this forum... good lord people

“Rolex madness”
dubins930 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:27 AM   #111
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALF61 View Post
Those who “invested” in stocks too. Under that set of circumstances Rolex will probably hold up their value just as good as Gold.
Just so I'm clear, you're not actually claiming that, generally speaking, Rolexes make better investment vehicles than stocks, are you?
JacksonStone is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:31 AM   #112
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLMARINER View Post
Nope.

You keep painting with a very broad brush, as if all Rolex owners are the same when we're not. Some of us are 70 and retired with substantial savings, some of us are 55 and trendy multi-millionaires, some of us are 40 and pinched by college savings, some of us are 30 and saving for a house, and some of us are 25 and just starting our careers.

Perhaps you identify with some of the less-well-off groups and view the world through that lens. What I can tell you is that the market could dip 50% tomorrow and it wouldn't make me think twice about dropping $18K on a Rolex I really wanted. And I'm not alone. Rolex has sold 20,000,000 watches in the past 20 years and I'm guessing another 10,000,000 were bought through the pre-owned market. That's a lot of Rolexes out there and a lot of owners who would gobble up the paltry 3,000 BLRO's being produced each year.

In a recession, Rolex will cut BLRO production and the wealthy $18K crowd won't be affected by any market dip. I can't say it any clearer than that.
I appreciate your concern regarding my financial, however, I’m quite comfortable. I just look at the economy from a realistic POV and understand there are ebbs and flows that also impact Rolex. Rolex isn’t going anywhere (thankfully!) but they aren’t immune to the ebbs and flows. Rolex is currently at an unprecedented demand and nobody has seen it this way before.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:34 AM   #113
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubins930 View Post
This is some of the most asinine nonsense I’ve ever seen on this forum... good lord people

“Rolex madness”
Please elaborate, would love to hear your POV. I think the comments are fascinating and really enjoy seeing the different takes. I have tons of respect for people on this forum even if our opinions differ.
SFBAY is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:46 AM   #114
ROLMARINER
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBAY View Post
I appreciate your concern regarding my financial, however, I’m quite comfortable. I just look at the economy from a realistic POV and understand there are ebbs and flows that also impact Rolex. Rolex isn’t going anywhere (thankfully!) but they aren’t immune to the ebbs and flows. Rolex is currently at an unprecedented demand and nobody has seen it this way before.
Apple produces 63,000,000 iPhone X’s per year.

Rolex produces 3,000 BLRO’s per year. Maybe 5,000. Twist my arm maybe 9,000.

There aren’t enough. Any way you want to state it, there aren’t enough. And there are substantially more than a couple thousand interested buyers, probably more like a couple of million.

Some references are indeed immune to ebbs and flows.
ROLMARINER is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:50 AM   #115
ALF61
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Middle America
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
Just so I'm clear, you're not actually claiming that, generally speaking, Rolexes make better investment vehicles than stocks, are you?
Definitely not, but the premise for a big fall in Rolex watches prices at least in this forum is tied to a stock market crash. IMO that would be the least of our worries and under such circumstances where the stock values might halve like in 2008 if there is a crash, then I think Rolex hot watches will retain their value than stocks. That is what people do in times of uncertainty is move their money to more tangible assets like gold and, well, maybe Rolex je je !!
ALF61 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 04:57 AM   #116
Speedbird-1
"TRF" Member
 
Speedbird-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,061
Just read all this.
..........................I need a drink!
Speedbird-1 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 05:08 AM   #117
dubins930
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
dubins930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Aaron
Location: WA
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBAY View Post
Please elaborate, would love to hear your POV. I think the comments are fascinating and really enjoy seeing the different takes. I have tons of respect for people on this forum even if our opinions differ.
People make up numbers about production, make up some Rolex scheme that places the current watch they own as the only thing not affected in economic downturn. People think the price of grey market watches are sustainable for decades to come because they paid x amount... guess who paid Msrp at the AD... they guy who just took you for 9k. Someone even put a list of brands that “we should worry about” during hard economic times... but not Rolex because of some mystery product reduction strategy that he made up. I feel like I’m taking crazy pills! Rolex madness
dubins930 is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 05:14 AM   #118
BakerView
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: "BG"
Location: PacNW
Watch: that I'm Jonesin 4
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt Virgil Hilts View Post
Just read all this.
..........................I need a drink!

The market is unpredictable.
Rolex is predictable....their value will go up and their inventory will be a tight secret.

Is the tide in? Time to hoist the sail.....
__________________
116610LN, 326934BL, 116610LV, Tudor BB41, IWC tzc,
Aerospace EVO, Tudor BB41, 116622, Fortis-705.21.11, Luminox original diver


The watch you give up today for the next grail may one day become your grail:
Rolex:116520, 16570, 216570, 116710LN, 16610LV, 16700, 116600
Panerai:PAM176, PAM1024, PAM88
Breitling:6.75, Aerospace x2, Chrono 44 GMT, Blackbird/utc, Bentley GT
IWC:3717.
BakerView is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 05:14 AM   #119
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubins930 View Post
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills! Rolex madness
Welcome to the Rolex bubble. It's not just a market; it's a place to live.
JacksonStone is offline  
Old 8 December 2018, 05:31 AM   #120
Dlong
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Nj
Watch: Black sub Date
Posts: 456
Today the market officially hit correction territory. Down 10% off the high of 26,800. We’ll see how long this lasts or will it go lower.
Dlong is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.