The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 February 2018, 10:05 AM   #1
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Icon7 Is Stainless Steel the new PM ??? >>>>>

With the current Rolex market and all the controlled
SS professional model shortages will there be an end
to this madness? One would have to admit 904L shines
quite brilliantly in the spotlight and thus the popularity of
stainless steel professional Rolex models ...
A possible eminent price hike here in the US coupled with
the crazy demand on the most popular models intentionally
constrained in supply , the price gap on these models and certain
PM models is closing in ....

Taking in consideration the supply/demand and premium
Prices on the secondary market for highly coveted SS models
one would have to really determine which will be a
better bargain long term ...?

Just putting it out there, the SS madness doesn’t seem to
settle down ...

$9K plus SS Sub Date
$10K BLNR’s
$11/12K Hulks
$13K plus SD43 Anniversary
$18K Daytona C’s

Wow!!!!! Madness I tell you .... Yet Stainless Steel seems
to rule and be highly coveted more so than PM or TT....
or so it may seem...

So I know SS flies under the radar so many say but
it’s still a Rolex and 904L is quite brilliant!!!

What say you , considering the current market madness
and Rolex stainless steel shines quite nicely SS or PM ?
Which is better long term ?
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg DCC2630B-A220-4A38-8900-D873833120BF.jpeg (247.5 KB, 1827 views)
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 10:10 AM   #2
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,523
What’s funny is that some TT models which obviously cost more to make and are at higher MSRP sell from ADs after discount for less than SS models from grey market!

It’s supply and demand that’s driving this craze!! Which tells me the pendulum has to set. Demand will change. It’s a fact that taste changes, interest changes and demand changes with it. That’s when the craze will settle down!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 10:16 AM   #3
ferrissteve11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,115
I'm no Oracle, but I think the current pricing is a bubble of sorts that will burst sooner as opposed to later. Will Rolex watches be more expensive today than they were a few years ago ?? yes....but I don't think it will be a long term or permanent situation. Like a lot of others have speculated: see what Basel brings in terms of new models, pricing, etc.
Though like all things Rolex availability and pricing related...its all just a guess as only Rolex knows and they're NOT talking.
ferrissteve11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 10:17 AM   #4
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
No, but nice try.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 10:31 AM   #5
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
No, but nice try.


Just putting it out there Neil...
One might argue that there’s no need for a pm
if they can only get their hands on one of these
Hot models ....

Someday I hope to find out and scratch the pm itch ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 10:32 AM   #6
rebel_1
"TRF" Member
 
rebel_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post


Just putting it out there Neil...
One might argue that there’s no need for a pm
if they can only get their hands on one of these
Hot models ....

Someday I hope to find out and scratch that itch ...
I’m in the opposite camp. No need for SS!!
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
rebel_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 11:11 AM   #7
pigman08
"TRF" Member
 
pigman08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Watch: 16610,16710,214270
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel_1 View Post
No need for SS!!
Or Rolex, for that matter, but I sure do want 'em!!
pigman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 11:15 AM   #8
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
I started a thread about this topic also... it has an interesting article about value for money.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=585687


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 11:55 AM   #9
77T
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
The SS watches could overtake TT watches. But never the PM models.

As for metallurgy- um...no, SS is not the new PM.

But if rumors get started about new .500 Platinums coming out at Basel 2018, don’t say you heard it from me...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 11:57 AM   #10
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,599
SS is more useable/wearable in most situations. The popularity of such will continue.

__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 11:57 AM   #11
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
I think SS will always rule with collectors. We see Rolex as tool watches and SS fits with this aesthetic and therefore becomes more collectible, desirable and even authentic in the wis mindset. The market shows this time after time with SS being a better investment than precious metal.

I agree that Rolex SS is so beautiful that it competes favourably with precious metal.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:00 PM   #12
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
I see a different explanation. Historically, many people have wanted the most affordable Rolex they could buy, and those were SS models. Now that white metals are en vogue, as are sports models (as opposed to dress models), SS sports watches are in high demand.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:03 PM   #13
lucevan le stelle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: garden state
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
SS is more useable/wearable in most situations. The popularity of such will continue.

This. SS is the equivalent of death and taxes in the watch-buying community, you can't escape it or replace the demand for it.
lucevan le stelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:08 PM   #14
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
If one could choose I would ONLY buy PM. If money was no factor.

Nothing beats the feeling of strapping a PM piece to the wrist no matter what anyone says.

As harsh as it sounds SS is the most popular because of 1 simple thing. Price point! Otherwise everyone would buy WG.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:11 PM   #15
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhawli View Post
I started a thread about this topic also... it has an interesting article about value for money.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=585687


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I tried to search the threads but my wording was off ...
on point...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:30 PM   #16
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpl View Post
As harsh as it sounds SS is the most popular because of 1 simple thing. Price point! Otherwise everyone would buy WG.

Plenty of words come to mind, but “harsh” isn’t one of them.

Just wow !


__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:34 PM   #17
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
I see a different explanation. Historically, many people have wanted the most affordable Rolex they could buy, and those were SS models. Now that white metals are en vogue, as are sports models (as opposed to dress models), SS sports watches are in high demand.
What makes you think yellow gold is dead? This forum is a minute population of the watch world, and I guarantee you Rolex still sells millions of yellow gold watches. I happen to own a few myself.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:38 PM   #18
Benjamin Choi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpl View Post
If one could choose I would ONLY buy PM. If money was no factor.

Nothing beats the feeling of strapping a PM piece to the wrist no matter what anyone says.

As harsh as it sounds SS is the most popular because of 1 simple thing. Price point! Otherwise everyone would buy WG.
bingo, give this man a beer
Benjamin Choi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 12:57 PM   #19
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,711
PM isn't valued as it once was in many upscale households.
.Many search out SS Rolex models regardless of price. Personal style and their values may never have any interest in owning a PM Rolex watch to many that can easily afford to. I know many very wealthy associates that fit into this category.

It's not like you can order any model in every metal and color combo so that is also a factor. Is the SS Daytona more in demand because of cost?
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:02 PM   #20
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver View Post
I think SS will always rule with collectors. We see Rolex as tool watches and SS fits with this aesthetic and therefore becomes more collectible, desirable and even authentic in the wis mindset. The market shows this time after time with SS being a better investment than precious metal.

I agree that Rolex SS is so beautiful that it competes favourably with precious metal.
Agreed David, very few collectible pm Rolex ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:07 PM   #21
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
Many search out SS Rolex models regardless of price. It's not like you can order any model in every metal and color combo. Is the SS Daytona more in demand because of cost?
It’s gorgeous , versatile and highly desirable...
nothing to do with it being a pm or not ...
SS Daytona’s have been for a long time
the most sought after ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:14 PM   #22
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
Is Stainless Steel the new PM?
If ADs increase the practice of insisting on a PM purchase before bestowing the privilege of an SS acquisition, you may have a point.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:17 PM   #23
rebel_1
"TRF" Member
 
rebel_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
Seems every thread of this type comes down to the haters for some reason. I’ll just say this, and flame me if you want, there is no comparison. A PM Rolex is WAY better than the SS version. If you haven’t had the opportunity, or the ability, to own one, I understand the hatred. If you have, then I respect your opinion. But if you haven’t and you’re going to go crazy with the price of SS vs PM, save your agrument because it’s a losing one.

Either way, it’s just a watch.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
rebel_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:21 PM   #24
Justindo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
I could easily afford PM Rolexes, but I only have SS ones. To me, PMs are for dress watches, not sport watches.
Justindo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:22 PM   #25
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacksonStone View Post
If ADs increase the practice of insisting on a PM purchase before bestowing the privilege of an SS acquisition, you may have a point.
It’s already been happening. I hope not for too long.
It used to be buying a pm was a privilege, now buying
a SS professional watch is a privilege is you can make
the list ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:31 PM   #26
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,599
What an informative thread !

Only unsophisticated broke-ass low-life’s wear SS Rolex because they are cheap. Surely this lower class of individual does nothing but stare in amazement at the PM Rolex of the more fortunate among us.

Got it !


__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:33 PM   #27
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel_1 View Post
Seems every thread of this type comes down to the haters for some reason. I’ll just say this, and flame me if you want, there is no comparison. A PM Rolex is WAY better than the SS version. If you haven’t had the opportunity, or the ability, to own one, I understand the hatred. If you have, then I respect your opinion. But if you haven’t and you’re going to go crazy with the price of SS vs PM, save your agrument because it’s a losing one.

Either way, it’s just a watch.
No pm hate here brother... I think the SS price madness
has gone too far ... That’s why I even posed the question...
There are several pm Rolex I’d love to own if $$$ was not a factor ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:36 PM   #28
JacksonStone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel_1 View Post
Seems every thread of this type comes down to the haters for some reason. I’ll just say this, and flame me if you want, there is no comparison. A PM Rolex is WAY better than the SS version. If you haven’t had the opportunity, or the ability, to own one, I understand the hatred. If you have, then I respect your opinion. But if you haven’t and you’re going to go crazy with the price of SS vs PM, save your agrument because it’s a losing one.

Either way, it’s just a watch.
I'm not seeing hate in this thread either for PM or SS. What I am seeing is a fair degree of haughtiness from some admirers of PM, who tellingly feel the need to proclaim the superiority of their preference, while condescendingly dismissing the preferences some people have for SS as hatred born of the inability to afford PM. It's hard to imagine a more self-serving rationale.
JacksonStone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:38 PM   #29
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
What an informative thread !

Only unsophisticated broke-ass low-life’s wear SS Rolex because they are cheap. Surely this lower class of individual does nothing but stare in amazement at the PM Rolex of the more fortunate among us.

Got it !


I guess there must be quite a lot of broke a$$ people
wearing Daytona C’s, SD 43 50th, Hulks ... etc!!!
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2018, 01:41 PM   #30
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
I guess there must be quite a lot of broke a$$ people
wearing Daytona C’s, SD 43 50th, Hulks ... etc!!!





This thread wins “Most Arrogant” thus far in 2018 !


__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.