ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 July 2018, 08:17 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 2
|
Loving the vintage explorer!!!
|
9 July 2018, 08:23 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: JohnLT
Location: Boston
Watch: time fly
Posts: 618
|
I have a 8.5" wrist and prefer 39/40mm. I do own a 42 and 41mm Tudors that are ok, But the Sub and Exp 1 are the perfect size IMO.
|
9 July 2018, 08:24 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Filipe
Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah
Watch: Never too many
Posts: 1,898
|
40mm is tops.
|
9 July 2018, 08:26 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: britain
Posts: 712
|
|
9 July 2018, 08:28 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: britain
Posts: 712
|
|
9 July 2018, 08:32 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
40 to 44mm for me but what really matters is the shape of the case and the lugs. That can make a watch look bigger or smaller, i.e the Sub and SD43.
|
9 July 2018, 10:05 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
|
Yes!! Im a big guy 6-3” fit. I have very flat 8” wrists. So I can pull off anything. With that said I like to stay around 45mm but I also wear a pelagos and it looks great. I know its all personal pref. But for me anything smaller than the pelagos looks silly on me. Pretty much like im wearing a ladies watch. Ive even had her comment on it when trying watches on. LoL
I thank goodness never pulled the pin on a super avenger when I was younger. All I do now is see guys wearing these 80mm sized invicta and I DO NOT want to be associated with that crowd lol. I know thats a bold statement but honestly every single person I see wearing a giant invicta is acting like a giant D..... |
9 July 2018, 11:10 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: jeff
Location: California
Watch: S.D. 43, Sub LVc
Posts: 65
|
I have a 7.5" wrist and have slowly gone smaller. I still have my big chunky watches from my younger days, 47-52mm, now I am happy with 40 to 43mm. This is why I have the SD43 and the Hulk now.
|
9 July 2018, 11:38 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 1,606
|
I like a range and depends on the watch. Happy to wear a dress watch from 36mm up to sport watches topping out at 43mm.
|
9 July 2018, 01:40 PM | #70 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Z
Location: Bay Area
Watch: 126610
Posts: 314
|
I've been back and forth a bit on size. I'm 5'9 with small 6" wrists. Owned a 36mm Explorer and while it looked great in wrist shots, I thought it looked pretty small in person (dial was really tiny). Now own a 39mm Explorer, just barely fits my wrist but doesn't look that big in person. With that said, I'm now thinking of going back to a 36mm again. I guess the grass is always greener for me...
|
9 July 2018, 06:57 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Jay rey
Location: CA, bay area
Watch: el presidente
Posts: 263
|
36 seems tiny now
__________________
------------------------ YG - DAYDATE-PRESIDENT TT - DATEJUST-JUBILEE SS - DATEJUST-JUBILEE |
9 July 2018, 10:18 PM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: NeoAnderson
Location: Tax Free Shopping
Posts: 725
|
36mm daydate
40mm sd4k 7"-7.25" wrist Great pairing |
9 July 2018, 10:29 PM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
|
32 cellini to 47 Pam, all good for me. Design, history and appearance of the watch is more important to me.
|
9 July 2018, 10:40 PM | #74 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,476
|
34mm is my favourite size.
|
9 July 2018, 10:55 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
|
__________________
Nick _________________________________________ 14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver |
9 July 2018, 11:42 PM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 327
|
Yep!!
I used to find 43-45 mm sweet spot. Now I much prefer 40-42 mm and don't own anything larger than that. |
10 July 2018, 12:14 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Unknown
Posts: 289
|
I dipped my feet in a bit when the oversized and overbuilt fad was in its peak.
Now I wouldn't own a watch over 40 mm. |
10 July 2018, 12:27 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: ROLEX SD-RED-43
Posts: 16
|
For me the 40mm doesn't work. Too small. 41mm minimum and 43mm like my red SD 43
is my sweet spot....The perfect size. Which why I think Tudor 41mm GMT got it right. |
10 July 2018, 01:23 AM | #79 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,244
|
Yes, same for me. Lately I prefer watches in the 36mm - 40mm range.
|
10 July 2018, 01:44 AM | #80 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA, Netherland
Watch: Rolex 116710
Posts: 104
|
I wear according to how big or small my wrist is, i wear what gives my wrist a better look I think thats one of the reason we buy watches.
|
10 July 2018, 01:44 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,510
|
In my early 20’s, 44mm. As I have gotten older, my taste has leaned smaller. Dress pieces are about 36mm and sport 40mm. My Speedy Pro is the odd one out at 42mm. It’s thin profile makes it very wearable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 July 2018, 01:54 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 781
|
I have both big and small watches and all in all 36mm is what I prefer as an every day beater and always have preferred. That does not mean I do not mix it up sometimes with some 40+mm watches, but all in all my 36mm watches gets the most wrist time.
__________________
...And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years... |
10 July 2018, 01:55 AM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
43mm is my sweet spot, I know I’m in the minority here, but I like large watches. Not the typical Rolex customer though, more like Navitimer, Panerai and IWC
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
10 July 2018, 02:23 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midwest, U.S.A.
Watch: 116520 & 3570.50
Posts: 255
|
Not so much taste change but educating myself. Rolex is a Classic. Classics don't change. I have 9 1/2 inch wrist. Everything wears like a ladies watch. But I know a real Rolex (Daytona) isn't big. It's got a Classic size. You can say I'm rationalizing, but it seemed like it grew onto my wrist. The Speedmaster Pro just didn't. I take that to mean, Rolex designers probably studied the envelope of practicality, and wearability. They probably figured this stuff out years ago.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.