The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 26 February 2008, 01:25 PM   #1
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
My Sea Dweller Review

Hi everyone. This is a review I wrote last year, upon acquiring my Sea Dweller. It was posted by me on another forum, and I see that there is a section here now for Rolex reviews, so I thought I'd post the review and pix here too. Hope you enjoy.

Chris

************************************************** ********


Introduction.

I recently obtained a Sea Dweller (model number 16600). As the name implies and as most of you will know, this is the deep sea diver of the Rolex line. It uses Rolex movement 3135, and is COSC certified. I was looking for a rugged tool watch in this line. I like a date feature in a watch, and found that I did not like the Cyclops. I know many are fans of that feature, but--and this is a personal opinion--I found the Cyclops overwhelmed the crystal and was distracting to me. So, I chose the Sea Dweller; it is rugged, heavily built, meant to last, is beautiful in a low-key fashion and has the features I want in a tool watch.


Overall.


Rolex has been a name most of has have know since we were quite young. I recall the excellent advertisments that Rolex ran in the National Geogprahic magazines of the 1970's, portaying their watches as the quintessential tool for explorers and adventurers far and wide. It was a watch that looked rugged, the first I'd seen with protective shoulders around the crown, indicative of the risks of adventure that the wearer accepted by taking on such an iconic watch. It certainly wasn't the plain flat disc that my father and uncles wore. Since I'm a firm believer that a tool watch is to be used, not locked away, I have been wearing the Sea Dweller at work and at home, and have not been suprised to find it is a beautiful, accurate and rugged timepiece that is a pleasure to use.

Case.



The Oyster case is 40 mm stainless steel, being carved from a single solid block of 904L stainless. There have been discussions as to the purposes of this, most diving watches being made from 316L stainless. What is the point? Rolex warrants that the nickel content is higher, and as such, prevents corrosion.



There is debate as to whether this is necessary or even serves a purpose with normal corrosion levels of metals in seawater at sea level. Be that as it may, the case is 904L stainless. My AD advises that the case of the Sea Dweller and Submariner are the same size, though I saw the post in this forum that reckons that the Sea Dweller case is fractionally smaller than the Sub.

As such, the Sea Dweller is no Panarai. It has a reasonably sized case and dial. The case has brushed and polished aspects, the sides (crown on the 3 'o'clock side and helium escape valve on the 9 'o'clock side) are highly polished.


Movement.

The Sea Dweller uses the Rolex 3135 movement, which is COSC and which in my experience is keeping +/- 3 seconds a day. This is a tried and true movement, also used on the Sub Date models.

Dial.



The dial is black enamel, a deep, bottomless pitch-black with no guilloche or texturing. There is an understated elegance in this dial, the only shine or shimmer I've noticed in the dial itself is in the area around the date at 3 'o'clock, where the dial surface dips to meet the date wheel and the crease in the enamel draws the light and you get a sense of texture. The indices are circular white gold filled with luminescent material.






The hands are also white gold, detailed with luminesence, including the iconic Mercedes-symbol hour hand. The white gold therefore relfects light in a low key but definate manner. When I turn my wrist in the light with this piece, light all but ripples across the indices, reminding me of looking at jewellery displays in museums; subdued, but with presence and bearing.

Bezel.

The bezel is a coin-edge affair which is larger than the Submariner and Submariner Date models. It turns well and firmly with 120 clicks per rotation. I love the slight angle Rolex has on their bezel, combined with the fashion in which the number indices are set into the bezel surface. Each of the indents in the coin edge is sufficiently polished that when facing the bottom of the bezel at the 6 'o'clock, when you rotate your hand left and right, you'll see the ambient light glide along the polished groves of the bezel edge.

Crown.

The Submariners and the Sea Dweller use the Triplock screwdown crown, with O-ring gaskets on the shaft of the crown to prevent water ingress. The crown of course bears the livery of the Rolex Coronet.

Crystal.


This is a 3 mm thick sapphire crystal. I cannot say if there is anti-reflective coating on the underside of the crystal, there certainly is not on the outside. The crystal sits flat and about 2 mm proud of the surface of the bezel. As an authentication, Rolex laser-engraves a coronet symbol around the 6 'o'clock on the crystal.

Bracelet.

The Sea Dweller has the 93160 bracelet, as compared to the 93250 found on the Submariner. My AD held up both the Sea Dweller and the Sub for me to look at, and I could see the Sea Dweller had the thicker, beefier links and more substantial point of connection to the case. Interestingly on my watch, the case horns (exterior) do not have holes or screws evident. As concerns the clasp, I have read complaints about the cheapness of the clasp in a watch at this price point, and I must agree that I'd rather see something like the twin-bar clasp on the Omega SMP or Speed Pro lines. There is a wetsuit extention on this bracelet, with a raised "O" on the metal to indicate the presspoint to actuate the extention release. The extention is returned to its original position by clasping it to a substantial steel pivot bar in the clasp mechanism. The exterior of the clasp bears the Rolex Coronet, and interior clasp has the the word "Rolex" and a stylised scrolling design.

Presentation Box.

A substantial affair, which has an outer paper holder with no ends. The main box slides out of this, to reveal a light green hard paper box with the Rolex Coronet. This opens to reveal the inner soft leatherette box with green top and a three-dimensional ocean wave motif. Inside, your packaged Sea Dweller has a protective foam covering, and clear thick protective plastic that peels from the sides, face and back. There is also plastic protective wrap on the clasp elements. The green adhesive holographic brand stuck the caseback eventually wears off to reveal the only engraving on stock Rolex diving watch casebacks: "ROLEX OYSTER Original Gas Escape Valve" and two Rolex Coronets, the engraving is backfilled in black. I would like to see some sort of sea creature or medallion on the back to give it more character, but no dice. The case is, of course, screw down. The box also contains a manual for the Submariner, for "Your Rolex Oyster", a hard paper 2006/2007 wallet calendar with classic Rolex green and Coronet, a soft green wallet-like affair with a Rolex knurled-metal watch tool (Rolex ref.2100), additional wetsuit extention link, and dive table card. Rolex no longer includes the little key-chain anchor that used to accompany the Sea Dweller.

Conclusion.



This is a substantial watch, heavy at 147 grams, making it the heaviest stock Oyster Professional (beating the Yacht Master by 1 gram) if I'm not mistaken. It has polish and presence, but is not overly flashy. Since this is one of the most copied watches on the planet, people will not remark on it right away they way they might when they see a much larger-cased watch. Since I wear this watch for myself, and not to be noticed, this is just fine.

I wanted the most rugged, "been-there-done-that" Rolex I could afford, and the Sea Dweller is rich in history and performance. For my liking, it is also less common than the Submariner, and even its name, Sea Dweller, seems to imply that this watch would be quite content lurking in the depths for extended periods of time. Since I do not dive commercially, I will likely not use the helium escape valve feature.

I find it comfortable, but it wears a bit heavy and you do not often forget you're wearing it. If you're interested inthis watch, I'd strongly suggest a visit to an AD to try it and the Subs on. The Subs wear lighter, but they have the Cyclope or, in the case of the 14060M Submariner Professional, there is no date and the movement is not COSC, though I'm told its as accurate as COSC, so, all a matter of choice.

I hope you've enjoyed, the opinions, errors and ommissions are purely my own.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg crown.jpg (17.8 KB, 4231 views)
File Type: jpg caseback3.jpg (26.4 KB, 4214 views)
File Type: jpg dialside.jpg (49.5 KB, 4233 views)
File Type: jpg floating.jpg (15.3 KB, 4211 views)
File Type: jpg lasercoronet.jpg (23.4 KB, 4200 views)
File Type: jpg timedexp.jpg (20.9 KB, 4194 views)
File Type: jpg UVtimed.jpg (43.6 KB, 4200 views)
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2008, 01:57 PM   #2
Tombstone
"TRF" Member
 
Tombstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
Great review, I like the photographs as well. The SD is the all time "TANK" Rolex. You just can not beat the SD for a die hard every day use watch.
__________________
Always working...by choice
Tombstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2008, 02:58 PM   #3
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,309
Great job! Excellent review.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC)
Letsgodiving is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 February 2008, 03:32 PM   #4
tandrup
"TRF" Member
 
tandrup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 921
Good review - thanks for sharing.
__________________
Regards,
Lars
14060M, 16570 White, 116200 Tuxedo Dial
Georg Jensen 2347
tandrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 02:20 AM   #5
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
Thanks!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 02:59 AM   #6
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Excellent review, nice pics!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 03:10 AM   #7
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Great review!
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 06:01 AM   #8
Texsubmariner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
Great review for a great watch.
__________________
Sea Dweller M series
SS GMT IIc M series
Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial
Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series
Texsubmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 07:28 AM   #9
Subdialler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: DSSD & SD
Posts: 113
Love the review, fantastic. I'll never be without mine!
Subdialler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 07:43 AM   #10
Perdu
"TRF" Member
 
Perdu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
Thanks for the review. Love the watch.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500

Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter
Perdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 08:36 AM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Chris, this is one of the BEST reviews I have EVER read! Really well-written and detailed!

Thanks for sharing!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 08:37 AM   #12
Robb
2024 Pledge Member
 
Robb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,928
Great review!!!! I enjoyed it!
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 February 2008, 01:51 PM   #13
mdtddd2007
2024 Pledge Member
 
mdtddd2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,628
Great review!
mdtddd2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 February 2008, 01:53 PM   #14
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Great review & photos !
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2008, 02:10 PM   #15
Cephas
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Chicago
Posts: 61
Great review and cool pictures. I especially liked how you can see the second hand movement as an arc in the lume shots. Exposure about 20 sec? Bravo!
Cephas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2008, 01:55 PM   #16
sharif
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South East USA
Posts: 671
Thank you sharing your well written review of the SD. This timepiece is definatey on my future "buy" list. Thanks again for sharing.
sharif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2008, 01:11 PM   #17
mickeydainish
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: LaLa Land
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,757
Wow.... gr8 review. I like the style you wrote it in. Great watch and some food for thought..... :-)
mickeydainish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2008, 03:15 PM   #18
Terry Newton
"TRF" Member
 
Terry Newton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
Excellent review. I almost bought this watch but went with an SS Date Submariner.

Your pictures are excellent. It looks like some a done in water. Yes?

You have me convinced it's an awesome watch.

Terry Newton
Terry Newton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2008, 05:25 PM   #19
timackerman
"TRF" Member
 
timackerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
Great review.

Thanks
__________________
Daytona 116520
timackerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2008, 03:15 PM   #20
erwin
-
 
erwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Erwin
Location: Hollywood, Ca
Watch: SD
Posts: 1,032
Now, I am overwhelmed and proud to own one!
__________________
Your watch silently speaks about your character!
sd/datejust/tudor/a couple of vintage omegas/tissotMB Meisterstuck Bordeaux pen/MB Noblesse Oblige/Starwalker/MB Classique Fountain pen/MB no 149
erwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2008, 07:47 AM   #21
Tony-GB
"TRF" Member
 
Tony-GB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
Icon14

What an amazing review. Extremely concise & the photos are superb. The fourth pic of the SD silhouette gave me goosebumps!

Thanks for posting
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?"

http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/

www.cheetah.org
Tony-GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 May 2008, 12:27 PM   #22
jbomb42
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: jerry
Location: Philippines
Posts: 81
hi guys! just want to ask (im super new here) im planning to buy a watch, but im only looking at spending atmost $7000. any sugestions guys.

in addition, this will be my first ever watch purchase... im 24yrs old and i want to spend for myself for the first watch... and i think watches/timepieces collecting is a nice invest/hobby.


thanks in advance
jbomb42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2008, 08:09 AM   #23
Brian R Campbell
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Calgary, Canada
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 3
Excellent review. Your AD, however, is correct in stating that the SD and the Sub share the same case diameter size. One thing to consider is that the SD appears slightly smaller to the eye due to the fact that the dial is slightly smaller to accomodate a correspondingly thicker bezel. This is evidently noticeable when the two watches are compared next to each other.
Brian R Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2008, 08:25 PM   #24
oztimelord
"TRF" Member
 
oztimelord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Rene
Location: Australia
Watch: PN 6241 Daytona
Posts: 466
Fully agree with your review

Great review, agree 100%

Just got an F series two weeks ago and love it (the last one with the anchor) . This is my first move back to Rolex and what a great way to re-start the collection.

Regards
Rene
oztimelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2008, 06:27 AM   #25
Narwhal
2024 Pledge Member
 
Narwhal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Sea
Posts: 73
Wow - great review - now I gotta figure out what to sell to get a SD!
Narwhal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2008, 01:38 AM   #26
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Newton View Post
Excellent review. I almost bought this watch but went with an SS Date Submariner.

Your pictures are excellent. It looks like some a done in water. Yes?

You have me convinced it's an awesome watch.

Terry Newton
Nope, I placed the watch on a piece of semi-opaque Plexiglas and shone light through from the bottom up towards the camera.

Thanks for the kind comments,

Chris
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 July 2008, 09:04 PM   #27
bolex!
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: deano
Location: london
Watch: mil sub
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbomb42 View Post
hi guys! just want to ask (im super new here) im planning to buy a watch, but im only looking at spending atmost $7000. any sugestions guys.

in addition, this will be my first ever watch purchase... im 24yrs old and i want to spend for myself for the first watch... and i think watches/timepieces collecting is a nice invest/hobby.


thanks in advance
get a last of the series seadweller they are bomb proof and will be a great investment especially as they are due to be discontinued!
bolex! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 July 2008, 01:53 PM   #28
gbo83
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: GB
Location: Canada
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 38
do u guys think that the discontinued sd will be a collector's someday? prices ranging to 10k+? my friend is interested in buying one for this reason
gbo83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2008, 11:58 PM   #29
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
Hard to say. However, it is being discontinued in favour of "the new measure", so they will likely become more collectable than less.
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 July 2008, 01:40 AM   #30
boyet
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Boyet
Location: Philippines
Watch: Sub ND
Posts: 268
I acquired mine pre owned, D serial. But amazingly there is the absence of " ROLEX OYSTER Original Gas Escape Valve" engraving on the caseback . Is there somebody out there with the same case as mine. I bought my SD from a friend. I already sought advise from an authorized dealer and was told that there were units that came out without the engraving. Is this true?
boyet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.