ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 November 2019, 12:18 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: William
Location: Houston Texas
Watch: Rolex Datejust II
Posts: 761
|
Getting the Omega Itch
Just as the post says I’m getting the Omega itch and I’m stuck on these., I have an Omega Seamaster AT GMT but really like the looks of the Planet Ocean series
Going to be a few more months as I’m hoping to get a good Christmas price of some sort so waiting towards the Holidays Here are my choices so looking for the good and bad on both, I have been super pleased with my AT GMT Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean ( steel ) https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/w...442101002?ab=1 Then I have this one in Titanium https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/w...442199001?ab=1 And finally this one https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/w...442201001?ab=1
__________________
Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L Rolex DJII 116334, Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79230R Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GMT 231.13.43.22.02.004 Ulysse Nardin Marine Torpilleur 1183.310/40 MAS Irukandji Vostok Komandirskie B&R BR0392-D-G-BR/SCA Vostok Komandirskie (Tank) South Bend Model 1 #716632 Vostok Amphibia (Sub) |
9 November 2019, 01:03 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 33
|
Like the titanium
|
9 November 2019, 01:17 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: RJ
Location: Hawaii
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,222
|
Just my personal opinions.
I like the look of the titanium. It's a little harder to read, but that just means I get to stare at the watch longer to tell the time. While I like the black dial, I like the titanium because it seems more unique. The oreo bezel PO--I really like the look of it, but IMHO it sort of defeats the purpose to have a GMT function on a dive watch. The bezel can't be used safely as a dive timer because it's bi-directional. For pure aesthetics though, it is definitely striking. And admittedly, between my dive watch and GMT watch, I do find I use the GMT function a lot more (I don't dive with my dive watch, so it's moot). If you travel, the GMT would definitely be useful. BTW, Tim Mosso did a review on it a while back. |
9 November 2019, 02:55 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Valley of the Sun
Watch: 126331 126610 3861
Posts: 3,235
|
The black and white ceramic bezel on the 215.30.44.22.01.001 is a killer!
So tempted...need to go lie down until it goes away. Good luck! Keep us posted... |
9 November 2019, 04:48 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 601
|
How about this one?
https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-o...52232442103001 The LE box contains the bracelet too
__________________
|
9 November 2019, 05:26 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,262
|
Not the third one because it doesn’t have the rubber insert in the first quarter of the ceramic bezel which is an awesome feat.
First or second. It all comes down to weight and feel so try them on and see if you prefer the heft of solid steel or the flyweight titanium. Titanium can feel a bit cheap and plasticky for a metal but looks pretty different. Tough choice but a side by side comparison with one in each hand should settle the matter. The PO Chrono looks even better still! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 November 2019, 06:53 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Texas
Watch: @Escapementt
Posts: 9,842
|
I like the titanium....the pop of orange really brings it together.
|
9 November 2019, 09:11 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,221
|
Every time I see a Planet Ocean with an orange bezel and markers on someone's wrist it strikes me that I need one. The configuration I would buy for myself is the first link in your post (steel with orange bezel/markers). Omega makes a strap for that watch that's black with orange trim, too.
|
9 November 2019, 10:51 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
Overall, I’d go with the titanium one, since titanium. And the orange. It’s a bizarre watch in a good way. If you try the steel one it’s hefty. When you pick up the ti watch the heft doesn’t match the size of the watch. It’s not as light as a gs snowflake but then that isn’t rated to 600m. I like it since it’s different- ti, clear caseback, rubber in insert, and rare. Ive been prowling the internet for reviews- the steel PO gets lots of coverage, but not the ti. And they all get even less compared to a sub. Hodinkee, watchtime, etc- it’s like they have to review a sub or Rolex diver every 6 months. The 2 drawbacks are thickness and cost- $2300 price premium for the ti version and lousy resale value.
If it’s steel, I’d go with the blue one. The gmt is out since I like a bit of color. I’ve heard from the local ad that the PO chronos are not selling. So if you like that you might be able to get a better deal. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 November 2019, 10:54 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,325
|
I like all of them. I think it will come down to personal choice. You can get a good discount now on any of these watches if you shop around. I would look pre-owned and save even more.
|
9 November 2019, 11:18 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: William
Location: Houston Texas
Watch: Rolex Datejust II
Posts: 761
|
Thanks for the info gents, the Mrs said she likes the TI one because it has a lighter face than my other watches but as pointed out the Ti commands a much higher price and on the resale side it’s most likely not recoverable
The Oreo one is very different but I honestly keep coming back to the first one and I have located that one and it’s never been worn with all tags from a reputable source Not going to get into a rush on getting as they all offer a unique look so I guess I will have to really think about it, I’m sure the quality is excellent on all three
__________________
Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L Rolex DJII 116334, Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79230R Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GMT 231.13.43.22.02.004 Ulysse Nardin Marine Torpilleur 1183.310/40 MAS Irukandji Vostok Komandirskie B&R BR0392-D-G-BR/SCA Vostok Komandirskie (Tank) South Bend Model 1 #716632 Vostok Amphibia (Sub) |
10 November 2019, 06:26 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Honolulu, HI
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 308
|
They're all gorgeous! You can't go wrong with any of them...the Pyeongchang LE included! Maybe I should upgrade my 213.30.42.40.01.001 to one of these.
|
10 November 2019, 06:57 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: Gatchaman
Posts: 1,872
|
The titanium is such a great watch. That’s my choice.
|
10 November 2019, 12:20 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: William
Location: Houston Texas
Watch: Rolex Datejust II
Posts: 761
|
I am thinking I will visit the local boutique here in Houston to try several on and compare side by side, I do like a heavy watch but I’m also liking the lighter colored dial on the TI version
__________________
Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L Rolex DJII 116334, Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79230R Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GMT 231.13.43.22.02.004 Ulysse Nardin Marine Torpilleur 1183.310/40 MAS Irukandji Vostok Komandirskie B&R BR0392-D-G-BR/SCA Vostok Komandirskie (Tank) South Bend Model 1 #716632 Vostok Amphibia (Sub) |
11 November 2019, 07:01 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: William
Location: Houston Texas
Watch: Rolex Datejust II
Posts: 761
|
Been looking and looking all day and a member here pointed me to a PO steel version that’s never been worn from a reputable seller and all I can say is it’s at a great price but the Mrs likes the titanium version better but it’s quite a lot more than the unworn one from this seller, resale has not been an issue so far as I have never sold any watch but I don’t want to be upside down either by over paying so what do you guys think or does it honestly come down to what my pocket can afford.
The titanium one can be had from gray for 30% lower than the AD and comes brand new with the full Omega 5 year factory warranty and so does the unworn steel version but as I said the titanium is a fair amount more so if I go that route I have to justify the additional cost in my mind but as my Mrs pointed out most of my current time pieces have a dark dial face ( blue or black ) and she said the PO with the partial orange ring and grey dial really stands out so I have to make a hard choice guess
__________________
Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L Rolex DJII 116334, Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79230R Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GMT 231.13.43.22.02.004 Ulysse Nardin Marine Torpilleur 1183.310/40 MAS Irukandji Vostok Komandirskie B&R BR0392-D-G-BR/SCA Vostok Komandirskie (Tank) South Bend Model 1 #716632 Vostok Amphibia (Sub) |
11 November 2019, 07:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Virginia
Watch: This one.
Posts: 1,745
|
I have had the pleasure of owning both the steel and titanium models. I enjoyed the steel for some time, but the weight and size got a little heavy at times. The titanium is in a whole different ballpark, especially on the rubber strap.
|
11 November 2019, 10:42 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 67
|
I’ve had this 43.5 PO for almost 2 years & have really enjoyed it a lot!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
11 November 2019, 10:45 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: William
Location: Houston Texas
Watch: Rolex Datejust II
Posts: 761
|
That’s what has my attention and that’s the weight, the heaviest watch I wear is a Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L, not sure of the weight but it’s pretty beefy but I don’t mind it, I’m guessing with the rubber strap if feels like wearing nothing ?
__________________
Citizens Eco-Drive BL1258-53L Rolex DJII 116334, Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79230R Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra GMT 231.13.43.22.02.004 Ulysse Nardin Marine Torpilleur 1183.310/40 MAS Irukandji Vostok Komandirskie B&R BR0392-D-G-BR/SCA Vostok Komandirskie (Tank) South Bend Model 1 #716632 Vostok Amphibia (Sub) |
11 November 2019, 01:02 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,188
|
I have the 42mm titanium with the 8500 movement. I find it very comfortable on the bracelet. It’s an awesome watch. My point is, I would go for the titanium model as your wife says. A picture because I like to show it off.....
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present) 116710 GMT Master II BLNR Seiko Prospex LX SNR031 Pelagos 42mm Explorer II 226570 |
15 November 2019, 01:01 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Denmark
Posts: 24
|
I Think the more classic you go, the longer it will stay in the collection
|
2 December 2019, 10:42 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: ROBERT SHAWGER
Location: WHARTON, NJ
Watch: ROLEX SOON
Posts: 283
|
All very nice choices. I just picked this one up. My first omega. Bought it to possibly flip it but on the fence cause u really like it.
|
3 December 2019, 09:00 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Tim
Location: USA
Watch: Too many
Posts: 220
|
I have the ti chrono on rubber. Extremely comfortable and my daily "beater". Just stick with any of the 215.X Gen 3 versions if on a bracelet for the micro adjustments. I have a mint 2019 blue dial coming in this week. Complete and will be priced right.
|
23 December 2019, 07:27 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex DD
Posts: 306
|
Leaning towards a Titanium PO. I've been eyeballing the Planet Ocean for a while.
|
23 December 2019, 10:55 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 57
|
|
24 December 2019, 02:33 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex DD
Posts: 306
|
|
24 December 2019, 03:18 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: England
Posts: 413
|
|
24 December 2019, 04:19 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 132
|
Which one did you end up getting?
|
24 December 2019, 01:09 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,221
|
|
24 December 2019, 04:08 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 236
|
I've tried on the third option (black and white bezel) and found that it seemed VERY thick even compared to the other PO models. I thought it even looked a bit awkward because of it's thickness.
My favorite is the second link in titanium.
__________________
Find me on Instagram: MN_Watch_Fanatic Patek: 5168G (Blue) Rolex: 126710BLRO, 116515LN, 124060 |
28 December 2019, 02:12 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 132
|
[/B]
I also tried on the Oreo bezel GMT and I noticed it was way to thick for me. It was thicker then my Titanium PO and it wasn't comfortable for my liking so I passed on it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.